From: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
Cc: linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
sfr@canb.auug.org.au, Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] lockdep: annotate i386 apm
Date: Thu, 12 Oct 2006 08:50:50 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1160635850.2006.98.camel@taijtu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20061011233925.c9ba117a.akpm@osdl.org>
On Wed, 2006-10-11 at 23:39 -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Thu, 12 Oct 2006 08:06:20 +0200
> Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl> wrote:
>
> > #define local_irq_restore(flags) \
> > do { \
> > if (raw_irqs_disabled_flags(flags)) { \
> > raw_local_irq_restore(flags); \
> > trace_hardirqs_off(); \
> > } else { \
> > trace_hardirqs_on(); \
> > raw_local_irq_restore(flags); \
> > } \
> > } while (0)
> >
> > So, say interrupts were enabled when entering apm_bios_call*(); you now
> > save that in flags, disable interrupts, and enable them again.
> > Upon reaching local_irq_restore(), we'll hit the else branch with irq's
> > enabled and call trace_hardirqs_on(), which goes EEEK!
>
> I'd assumed lockdep was less stupid than that ;) This? Seems a bit
> overdone..
Seems simple enough, bit on the verbose side, _however_ it depends on
the BIOS call not changing the irq state. I don't know about BIOSs but I
thought the general consensus was to distrust them.
Was my original _that_ hard to read?
> --- a/arch/i386/kernel/apm.c~lockdep-annotate-i386-apm
> +++ a/arch/i386/kernel/apm.c
> @@ -540,12 +540,6 @@ static inline void apm_restore_cpus(cpum
> * Also, we KNOW that for the non error case of apm_bios_call, there
> * is no useful data returned in the low order 8 bits of eax.
> */
> -#define APM_DO_CLI \
> - if (apm_info.allow_ints) \
> - local_irq_enable(); \
> - else \
> - local_irq_disable();
> -
> #ifdef APM_ZERO_SEGS
> # define APM_DECL_SEGS \
> unsigned int saved_fs; unsigned int saved_gs;
> @@ -583,11 +577,12 @@ static u8 apm_bios_call(u32 func, u32 eb
> u32 *eax, u32 *ebx, u32 *ecx, u32 *edx, u32 *esi)
> {
> APM_DECL_SEGS
> - unsigned long flags;
> cpumask_t cpus;
> int cpu;
> struct desc_struct save_desc_40;
> struct desc_struct *gdt;
> + int enable_irqs = 0;
> + int disable_irqs = 0;
>
> cpus = apm_save_cpus();
>
> @@ -596,12 +591,26 @@ static u8 apm_bios_call(u32 func, u32 eb
> save_desc_40 = gdt[0x40 / 8];
> gdt[0x40 / 8] = bad_bios_desc;
>
> - local_save_flags(flags);
> - APM_DO_CLI;
> + if (apm_info.allow_ints) {
> + if (irqs_disabled()) {
> + local_irq_enable();
> + disable_irqs = 1;
> + }
> + } else {
> + if (!irqs_disabled()) {
> + local_irq_disable();
> + enable_irqs = 1;
> + }
> + }
> +
> +
> APM_DO_SAVE_SEGS;
> apm_bios_call_asm(func, ebx_in, ecx_in, eax, ebx, ecx, edx, esi);
> APM_DO_RESTORE_SEGS;
> - local_irq_restore(flags);
> + if (disable_irqs)
> + local_irq_disable();
> + if (enable_irqs)
> + local_irq_enable();
> gdt[0x40 / 8] = save_desc_40;
> put_cpu();
> apm_restore_cpus(cpus);
> @@ -627,11 +636,12 @@ static u8 apm_bios_call_simple(u32 func,
> {
> u8 error;
> APM_DECL_SEGS
> - unsigned long flags;
> cpumask_t cpus;
> int cpu;
> struct desc_struct save_desc_40;
> struct desc_struct *gdt;
> + int enable_irqs = 0;
> + int disable_irqs = 0;
>
> cpus = apm_save_cpus();
>
> @@ -640,12 +650,25 @@ static u8 apm_bios_call_simple(u32 func,
> save_desc_40 = gdt[0x40 / 8];
> gdt[0x40 / 8] = bad_bios_desc;
>
> - local_save_flags(flags);
> - APM_DO_CLI;
> + if (apm_info.allow_ints) {
> + if (irqs_disabled()) {
> + local_irq_enable();
> + disable_irqs = 1;
> + }
> + } else {
> + if (!irqs_disabled()) {
> + local_irq_disable();
> + enable_irqs = 1;
> + }
> + }
> +
> APM_DO_SAVE_SEGS;
> error = apm_bios_call_simple_asm(func, ebx_in, ecx_in, eax);
> APM_DO_RESTORE_SEGS;
> - local_irq_restore(flags);
> + if (disable_irqs)
> + local_irq_disable();
> + if (enable_irqs)
> + local_irq_enable();
> gdt[0x40 / 8] = save_desc_40;
> put_cpu();
> apm_restore_cpus(cpus);
> _
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-10-12 6:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-10-11 13:40 [PATCH] lockdep: annotate i386 apm Peter Zijlstra
2006-10-11 21:18 ` Andrew Morton
2006-10-12 6:06 ` Peter Zijlstra
2006-10-12 6:39 ` Andrew Morton
2006-10-12 6:50 ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2006-10-12 7:29 ` Andrew Morton
2006-10-12 8:13 ` Peter Zijlstra
2006-10-12 8:02 ` Ingo Molnar
2006-10-12 8:26 ` Peter Zijlstra
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1160635850.2006.98.camel@taijtu \
--to=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=sfr@canb.auug.org.au \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.