From: Nigel Cunningham <ncunningham@linuxmail.org>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>, "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Use extents for recording what swap is allocated.
Date: Wed, 25 Oct 2006 09:03:33 +1000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1161731013.22729.40.camel@nigel.suspend2.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20061024224731.GA31091@infradead.org>
Hi.
On Tue, 2006-10-24 at 23:47 +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 25, 2006 at 08:06:36AM +1000, Nigel Cunningham wrote:
> > IIRC, I avoided list.h because I only wanted a singly linked list (it
> > never gets traversed backwards). List.h looks to me like all doubly
> > linked lists. Do you know if there are any other singly linked list
> > implementations I could piggy-back?
> >
> > That said, since there's normally not that many extents, I could switch
> > quite easily and it wouldn't normally waste much memory.
>
> If the overhead doesn't matter for you (and I doubt it does) I'd say just
> use list.h. Reusing existing code that doesn't need to be debugged and
> is idiomatically readable to everyone is very helpfull.
Ok.
Regards,
Nigel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-10-24 23:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 33+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-10-23 4:14 [PATCH] Use extents for recording what swap is allocated Nigel Cunningham
2006-10-23 15:32 ` Pavel Machek
2006-10-23 23:04 ` Nigel Cunningham
2006-10-24 8:43 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2006-10-24 20:08 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2006-10-24 21:34 ` Pavel Machek
2006-10-24 21:58 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2006-10-24 22:15 ` Nigel Cunningham
2006-10-24 22:19 ` Pavel Machek
2006-10-24 22:30 ` Nigel Cunningham
2006-10-25 8:11 ` Pavel Machek
2006-10-25 8:28 ` Nigel Cunningham
2006-10-25 8:42 ` Pavel Machek
2006-10-25 9:01 ` Nigel Cunningham
2006-10-25 9:10 ` Pavel Machek
2006-10-25 10:05 ` Nigel Cunningham
2006-10-25 12:46 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2006-10-27 11:37 ` Pavel Machek
2006-10-24 22:13 ` Nigel Cunningham
2006-10-24 22:45 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2006-10-24 23:05 ` Nigel Cunningham
2006-10-31 11:39 ` Nigel Cunningham
2006-10-24 20:42 ` Christoph Hellwig
2006-10-24 20:58 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2006-10-24 22:06 ` Nigel Cunningham
2006-10-24 22:47 ` Christoph Hellwig
2006-10-24 23:03 ` Nigel Cunningham [this message]
2006-10-25 9:17 ` Jens Axboe
2006-10-25 10:07 ` Nigel Cunningham
2006-10-25 10:20 ` Jens Axboe
2006-10-31 11:38 ` Nigel Cunningham
2006-11-01 12:36 ` Pavel Machek
2006-11-01 21:19 ` Nigel Cunningham
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1161731013.22729.40.camel@nigel.suspend2.net \
--to=ncunningham@linuxmail.org \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rjw@sisk.pl \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.