All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
To: linuxppc-dev list <linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org>
Subject: fixup_bigphys_addr and ioremap64 question
Date: Mon, 06 Nov 2006 14:17:25 +1100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1162783045.28571.283.camel@localhost.localdomain> (raw)

While merging io.h between 32 and 64 bits arch/powerpc, I stumbled upon
this little gem :-)

So we have these:

 - If CONFIG_PHYS_64BIT is not set, nothing special. phys_addr_t is
defined to be 32 bits.

 - If it is set however, we have phys_addr_t defined to be 64 bits in
asm-ppc/mmu.h. 

So why do we have both ioremap and ioremap64 knowing that the former is
defined to take a phys_addr_t argument ?

Currently, we have both, with the only difference being that ioremap
calls ioremap64 but also passes the argument through a
fixup_bigphys_addr() function first.

It took me a while to find it ... it's not defined in generic code but
in platform code (ugh !). In fact, the only version of it we have in
arch/powerpc is in the 85xx support and does:

phys_addr_t fixup_bigphys_addr(phys_addr_t addr, phys_addr_t size)
{
	return addr;
};

So here's my question: Is it, as I think, some old mecanism that was
useful when ioremap didn't take a phys_addr_t argument and resources
didn't have 64 bits fields and thus we had a way to "remap" IOs from a
32 bits space into a 64 bits space in a platform specific way ?

Now, the big question is: do we still need that ?

If, as I expect, the answer is no, then I'll just remove it. I'll also
remove ioremap64 from arch/powerpc since ioremap can take a 64 bits
value directly.

Now, if the answer is yes, then I'll turn it into a ppc_md. call since
it its current form, it's just broken.

Ben.

             reply	other threads:[~2006-11-06  3:17 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2006-11-06  3:17 Benjamin Herrenschmidt [this message]
2006-11-06  3:44 ` fixup_bigphys_addr and ioremap64 question Josh Boyer
2006-11-06  4:09   ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2006-11-06  4:16     ` Josh Boyer
2006-11-06  4:46       ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2006-11-06 16:45       ` Matt Porter
2006-11-06 19:27         ` Kumar Gala

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1162783045.28571.283.camel@localhost.localdomain \
    --to=benh@kernel.crashing.org \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.