All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Matt Porter <mporter@embeddedalley.com>
To: Josh Boyer <jwboyer@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: linuxppc-dev list <linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org>
Subject: Re: fixup_bigphys_addr and ioremap64 question
Date: Mon, 6 Nov 2006 10:45:42 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20061106164542.GA30762@gate.crashing.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1162786580.19697.9.camel@crusty.rchland.ibm.com>

On Sun, Nov 05, 2006 at 10:16:20PM -0600, Josh Boyer wrote:
> On Mon, 2006-11-06 at 15:09 +1100, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> > > > So why do we have both ioremap and ioremap64 knowing that the former is
> > > > defined to take a phys_addr_t argument ?
> > > > 
> > > > Currently, we have both, with the only difference being that ioremap
> > > > calls ioremap64 but also passes the argument through a
> > > > fixup_bigphys_addr() function first.
> > > > 
> > > > It took me a while to find it ... it's not defined in generic code but
> > > > in platform code (ugh !). In fact, the only version of it we have in
> > > > arch/powerpc is in the 85xx support and does:
> > > 
> > > It's in arch/ppc/syslib/44x_common.c and it's used to trap the least
> > > significant 32 bits of an address and set the right ERPN for io space on
> > > 44x.  Something like that might be needed when 44x merges to
> > > arch/powerpc.
> > 
> > Well, my point is that since nowadays we have 64 bits struct resource
> > and 64 bits phys_addr_t passed to ioremap, do we still need that ? In
> > fact, in my upcoming patch merging io.h for 32 and 64 bits in
> > asm-powerpc, I've simply removed that hook and ioremap64 :-) I can add
> > it back still, but so far, I yet have to be convinced there is still a
> > good reason for that hook.
> 
> Hm.. that might be ok.  I'm hoping to get back to working on something
> soon so I'll be able to tell more later.  Maybe Matt knows for sure.

Yes, that's the right way to go.  The history on this is that when
the 64-bit resource change came relatively recently, ioremap64 and
friends weren't killed off in arch/ppc.  ioremap64 only existed because
a long time ago several people blocked the idea of 64-bit resources
(on 32-bit platforms) and we needed a way around it plus all the
fixup garbage. Going forward, we now can handle everything through
ioremap() with no fixup stuff. There's a related issue with mmap and
64-bits but that's a separate issue yet that should now be addressed.

> It'll probably break out-of-tree drivers though once the merge happens
> for 4xx.  Could we leave ioremap64 around for a bit with a deprecation
> warning?

The kernel APIs break all the time. Every out of tree driver has to
have that built into their expectation when moving to a new kernel
so I don't see a good reason for making a special case here.

-Matt

  parent reply	other threads:[~2006-11-06 16:45 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2006-11-06  3:17 fixup_bigphys_addr and ioremap64 question Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2006-11-06  3:44 ` Josh Boyer
2006-11-06  4:09   ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2006-11-06  4:16     ` Josh Boyer
2006-11-06  4:46       ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2006-11-06 16:45       ` Matt Porter [this message]
2006-11-06 19:27         ` Kumar Gala

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20061106164542.GA30762@gate.crashing.org \
    --to=mporter@embeddedalley.com \
    --cc=jwboyer@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.