All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Lee Schermerhorn <Lee.Schermerhorn@hp.com>
To: Christoph Lameter <clameter@sgi.com>
Cc: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>,
	Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>,
	davem@davemloft.net, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	netdev@oss.sgi.com, linux-mm@kvack.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] add dev_to_node()
Date: Fri, 10 Nov 2006 13:28:25 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1163183306.15159.6.camel@localhost> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0611101015060.25338@schroedinger.engr.sgi.com>

On Fri, 2006-11-10 at 10:16 -0800, Christoph Lameter wrote:
> On Wed, 8 Nov 2006, KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki wrote:
> 
> > I wonder there are no code for creating NODE_DATA() for device-only-node.
> 
> On IA64 we remap nodes with no memory / cpus to the nearest node with 
> memory. I think that is sufficient.

I don't think this happens anymore.  Back in the ~2.6.5 days, when we
would configure our numa platforms with 100% of memory interleaved [in
hardware at  cache line granularity], the cpus would move to the
interleaved "pseudo-node" and the memoryless nodes would be removed.
numactl --hardware would show something like this:

# uname -r
2.6.5-7.244-default
# numactl --hardware
available: 1 nodes (0-0)
node 0 size: 65443 MB
node 0 free: 64506 MB

I started seeing different behavior about the time SPARSEMEM went in.
Now, with a 2.6.16 base kernel [same platform, hardware interleaved
memory], I see:

# uname -r# numactl --hardware
available: 5 nodes (0-4)
node 0 size: 0 MB
node 0 free: 0 MB
node 1 size: 0 MB
node 1 free: 0 MB
node 2 size: 0 MB
node 2 free: 0 MB
node 3 size: 0 MB
node 3 free: 0 MB
node 4 size: 65439 MB
node 4 free: 64492 MB
node distances:
node   0   1   2   3   4
  0:  10  17  17  17  14
  1:  17  10  17  17  14
  2:  17  17  10  17  14
  3:  17  17  17  10  14
  4:  14  14  14  14  10
2.6.16.21-0.8-default

[Aside:  The firmware/SLIT says that the interleaved memory is closer to
all nodes that other nodes' memory.  This has interesting implications
for the "overflow" zone lists...]

Lee


WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Lee Schermerhorn <Lee.Schermerhorn@hp.com>
To: Christoph Lameter <clameter@sgi.com>
Cc: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>,
	Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>,
	davem@davemloft.net, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	netdev@oss.sgi.com, linux-mm@kvack.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] add dev_to_node()
Date: Fri, 10 Nov 2006 13:28:25 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1163183306.15159.6.camel@localhost> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0611101015060.25338@schroedinger.engr.sgi.com>

On Fri, 2006-11-10 at 10:16 -0800, Christoph Lameter wrote:
> On Wed, 8 Nov 2006, KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki wrote:
> 
> > I wonder there are no code for creating NODE_DATA() for device-only-node.
> 
> On IA64 we remap nodes with no memory / cpus to the nearest node with 
> memory. I think that is sufficient.

I don't think this happens anymore.  Back in the ~2.6.5 days, when we
would configure our numa platforms with 100% of memory interleaved [in
hardware at  cache line granularity], the cpus would move to the
interleaved "pseudo-node" and the memoryless nodes would be removed.
numactl --hardware would show something like this:

# uname -r
2.6.5-7.244-default
# numactl --hardware
available: 1 nodes (0-0)
node 0 size: 65443 MB
node 0 free: 64506 MB

I started seeing different behavior about the time SPARSEMEM went in.
Now, with a 2.6.16 base kernel [same platform, hardware interleaved
memory], I see:

# uname -r# numactl --hardware
available: 5 nodes (0-4)
node 0 size: 0 MB
node 0 free: 0 MB
node 1 size: 0 MB
node 1 free: 0 MB
node 2 size: 0 MB
node 2 free: 0 MB
node 3 size: 0 MB
node 3 free: 0 MB
node 4 size: 65439 MB
node 4 free: 64492 MB
node distances:
node   0   1   2   3   4
  0:  10  17  17  17  14
  1:  17  10  17  17  14
  2:  17  17  10  17  14
  3:  17  17  17  10  14
  4:  14  14  14  14  10
2.6.16.21-0.8-default

[Aside:  The firmware/SLIT says that the interleaved memory is closer to
all nodes that other nodes' memory.  This has interesting implications
for the "overflow" zone lists...]

Lee

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

  reply	other threads:[~2006-11-10 18:28 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 35+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2006-10-30 14:15 [PATCH 2/3] add dev_to_node() Christoph Hellwig
2006-10-30 14:15 ` Christoph Hellwig
2006-10-30 22:33 ` David Miller
2006-10-30 22:33   ` David Miller, Christoph Hellwig
2006-11-01  0:10   ` Christoph Lameter
2006-11-01  0:10     ` Christoph Lameter
2006-11-01  0:53     ` David Miller
2006-11-01  0:53       ` David Miller, Christoph Lameter
2006-11-01  1:58       ` Christoph Lameter
2006-11-01  1:58         ` Christoph Lameter
2006-11-04 22:56   ` Christoph Hellwig
2006-11-04 22:56     ` Christoph Hellwig
2006-11-04 23:06     ` Dave Jones
2006-11-04 23:06       ` Dave Jones
2006-11-04 23:09       ` Christoph Hellwig
2006-11-04 23:09         ` Christoph Hellwig
2006-11-04 23:53       ` Christoph Hellwig
2006-11-04 23:53         ` Christoph Hellwig
2006-11-05  8:22         ` David Miller
2006-11-05  8:22           ` David Miller, Christoph Hellwig
2006-11-06 23:39           ` Christoph Hellwig
2006-11-06 23:39             ` Christoph Hellwig
2006-11-07  6:25         ` Ravikiran G Thirumalai
2006-11-07  6:25           ` Ravikiran G Thirumalai
2006-11-07 10:15           ` Christoph Hellwig
2006-11-07 10:15             ` Christoph Hellwig
2006-11-08  2:40     ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2006-11-08  2:40       ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2006-11-10 18:16       ` Christoph Lameter
2006-11-10 18:16         ` Christoph Lameter
2006-11-10 18:28         ` Lee Schermerhorn [this message]
2006-11-10 18:28           ` Lee Schermerhorn
2006-11-11  0:08           ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2006-11-11  0:08             ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2006-10-30 14:15 Christoph Hellwig

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1163183306.15159.6.camel@localhost \
    --to=lee.schermerhorn@hp.com \
    --cc=clameter@sgi.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=hch@lst.de \
    --cc=kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=netdev@oss.sgi.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.