* [LARTC] catching DNAT'ed packet
@ 2006-12-15 17:44
2006-12-19 10:01 `
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: @ 2006-12-15 17:44 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: lartc
Hi.
I have a Server's network with some servers in it, all with
192.168.1.0/25 ips. There is also a router in that network with ip
192.168.1.1. This router also connected to a client's network
10.10.0.0/16 with ip 10.10.100.1.
All services on each server are given their virtual address from one of
two virtual networks 192.168.1.128/28 and 192.168.1.144/28.
192.168.1.128/28 is for freely available services, and 192.168.1.144/28
is for services available only to authenticated ips.
There is a DNAT working on the router to map virtual ip/port to
realip/realport. That all works fine.
For axample:
users connecting to 192.168.1.129:80 are brought to 192.168.1.2:80
users connecting to 192.168.1.145:80 are brought to 192.168.1.2:81
I have to put all traffic I need for accounting to "-j ULOG
--ulog-nlgroup 10". And, packets should have ips seen to users. For
axample:
10.10.102.50 -> 192.168.1.145:80
192.168.1.145:80 -> 10.10.102.50
and
10.10.102.50 -> 192.168.1.129:80
192.168.1.129:80 -> 10.10.102.50
BUT, instead I have:
10.10.102.50 -> 192.168.1.145:80
192.168.1.2:81 -> 10.10.102.50
and
10.10.102.50 -> 192.168.1.129:80
192.168.1.2:80 -> 10.10.102.50
So, I can ulog the packet's in "state seen by users" only in
client->server direction, and I was unable to do that in server-clients
direction!
Here are iptables rules (I don't want to ulog packets to/from the router
itself):
iptables -t mangle -A PREROUTING -i br0 -j IPCAD_out
iptables -t mangle -A POSTROUTING -o br0 -j IPCAD_in
iptables -t mangle -A IPCAD_out -d 10.10.100.1 -j RETURN
iptables -t mangle -A IPCAD_out -d 192.168.1.1 -j RETURN
iptables -t mangle -A IPCAD_out -j ULOG --ulog-nlgroup 10
iptables -t mangle -A IPCAD_in -s 10.10.100.1 -j RETURN
iptables -t mangle -A IPCAD_in -s 192.168.1.1 -j RETURN
iptables -t mangle -A IPCAD_in -j ULOG --ulog-nlgroup 10
Is it possible to catch un-DNAT'ed packet???
--
Покотиленко Костик <casper@meteor.dp.ua>
_______________________________________________
LARTC mailing list
LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lartc
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* Re: [LARTC] catching DNAT'ed packet
2006-12-15 17:44 [LARTC] catching DNAT'ed packet
@ 2006-12-19 10:01 `
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: @ 2006-12-19 10:01 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: lartc
Maybe my question was too complex, I would try to make it simple...
Is it possible to catch un-DNAT'ed packet with -j ULOG target?
В Птн, 15/12/2006 в 19:44 +0200, Покотиленко Костик пишет:
> Hi.
>
> I have a Server's network with some servers in it, all with
> 192.168.1.0/25 ips. There is also a router in that network with ip
> 192.168.1.1. This router also connected to a client's network
> 10.10.0.0/16 with ip 10.10.100.1.
>
> All services on each server are given their virtual address from one of
> two virtual networks 192.168.1.128/28 and 192.168.1.144/28.
> 192.168.1.128/28 is for freely available services, and 192.168.1.144/28
> is for services available only to authenticated ips.
>
> There is a DNAT working on the router to map virtual ip/port to
> realip/realport. That all works fine.
>
> For axample:
> users connecting to 192.168.1.129:80 are brought to 192.168.1.2:80
> users connecting to 192.168.1.145:80 are brought to 192.168.1.2:81
>
> I have to put all traffic I need for accounting to "-j ULOG
> --ulog-nlgroup 10". And, packets should have ips seen to users. For
> axample:
>
> 10.10.102.50 -> 192.168.1.145:80
> 192.168.1.145:80 -> 10.10.102.50
> and
> 10.10.102.50 -> 192.168.1.129:80
> 192.168.1.129:80 -> 10.10.102.50
>
> BUT, instead I have:
>
> 10.10.102.50 -> 192.168.1.145:80
> 192.168.1.2:81 -> 10.10.102.50
> and
> 10.10.102.50 -> 192.168.1.129:80
> 192.168.1.2:80 -> 10.10.102.50
>
> So, I can ulog the packet's in "state seen by users" only in
> client->server direction, and I was unable to do that in server-clients
> direction!
>
> Here are iptables rules (I don't want to ulog packets to/from the router
> itself):
>
> iptables -t mangle -A PREROUTING -i br0 -j IPCAD_out
> iptables -t mangle -A POSTROUTING -o br0 -j IPCAD_in
>
> iptables -t mangle -A IPCAD_out -d 10.10.100.1 -j RETURN
> iptables -t mangle -A IPCAD_out -d 192.168.1.1 -j RETURN
> iptables -t mangle -A IPCAD_out -j ULOG --ulog-nlgroup 10
>
> iptables -t mangle -A IPCAD_in -s 10.10.100.1 -j RETURN
> iptables -t mangle -A IPCAD_in -s 192.168.1.1 -j RETURN
> iptables -t mangle -A IPCAD_in -j ULOG --ulog-nlgroup 10
>
> Is it possible to catch un-DNAT'ed packet???
>
--
Покотиленко Костик <casper@meteor.dp.ua>
_______________________________________________
LARTC mailing list
LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lartc
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2006-12-19 10:01 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2006-12-15 17:44 [LARTC] catching DNAT'ed packet
2006-12-19 10:01 `
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.