From: Tejun Heo <htejun@gmail.com>
To: jeff@garzik.org, alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk, ric@emc.com,
edmudama@gmail.com, linux-ide@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Tejun Heo <htejun@gmail.com>
Subject: [PATCH 2/5] libata: improve probe failure handling
Date: Fri, 2 Feb 2007 16:22:30 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <11704009503756-git-send-email-htejun@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <11704009502014-git-send-email-htejun@gmail.com>
* Move forcing device to PIO0 on device disable into
ata_dev_disable(). This makes both old and new EHs act the same
way.
* Speed down only PIO mode on probe failure. All commands used during
probing are PIO commands. There's no point in speeding down DMA.
* Retry at least once after -ENODEV. Some devices report garbled
IDENTIFY data after certain events. This shouldn't cause device
detach and re-attach.
* Rearrange EH failure path for simplicity.
Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <htejun@gmail.com>
---
drivers/ata/libata-core.c | 39 +++++++++++++++++++--------------------
drivers/ata/libata-eh.c | 35 ++++++++++++++++++-----------------
2 files changed, 37 insertions(+), 37 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/ata/libata-core.c b/drivers/ata/libata-core.c
index 417394b..cbd4bf1 100644
--- a/drivers/ata/libata-core.c
+++ b/drivers/ata/libata-core.c
@@ -596,6 +596,8 @@ void ata_dev_disable(struct ata_device *dev)
{
if (ata_dev_enabled(dev) && ata_msg_drv(dev->ap)) {
ata_dev_printk(dev, KERN_WARNING, "disabled\n");
+ ata_down_xfermask_limit(dev, ATA_DNXFER_FORCE_PIO0 |
+ ATA_DNXFER_QUIET);
dev->class++;
}
}
@@ -1745,9 +1747,8 @@ int ata_bus_probe(struct ata_port *ap)
{
unsigned int classes[ATA_MAX_DEVICES];
int tries[ATA_MAX_DEVICES];
- int i, rc, down_xfermask;
+ int i, rc;
struct ata_device *dev;
- int dnxfer_sel;
ata_port_probe(ap);
@@ -1755,8 +1756,6 @@ int ata_bus_probe(struct ata_port *ap)
tries[i] = ATA_PROBE_MAX_TRIES;
retry:
- down_xfermask = 0;
-
/* reset and determine device classes */
ap->ops->phy_reset(ap);
@@ -1804,10 +1803,8 @@ int ata_bus_probe(struct ata_port *ap)
/* configure transfer mode */
rc = ata_set_mode(ap, &dev);
- if (rc) {
- down_xfermask = 1;
+ if (rc)
goto fail;
- }
for (i = 0; i < ATA_MAX_DEVICES; i++)
if (ata_dev_enabled(&ap->device[i]))
@@ -1819,27 +1816,29 @@ int ata_bus_probe(struct ata_port *ap)
return -ENODEV;
fail:
+ tries[dev->devno]--;
+
switch (rc) {
case -EINVAL:
- case -ENODEV:
+ /* eeek, something went very wrong, give up */
tries[dev->devno] = 0;
break;
+
+ case -ENODEV:
+ /* give it just one more chance */
+ tries[dev->devno] = min(tries[dev->devno], 1);
case -EIO:
- sata_down_spd_limit(ap);
- /* fall through */
- default:
- tries[dev->devno]--;
- dnxfer_sel = ATA_DNXFER_ANY;
- if (tries[dev->devno] == 1)
- dnxfer_sel = ATA_DNXFER_FORCE_PIO0;
- if (down_xfermask && ata_down_xfermask_limit(dev, dnxfer_sel))
- tries[dev->devno] = 0;
+ if (tries[dev->devno] == 1) {
+ /* This is the last chance, better to slow
+ * down than lose it.
+ */
+ sata_down_spd_limit(ap);
+ ata_down_xfermask_limit(dev, ATA_DNXFER_PIO);
+ }
}
- if (!tries[dev->devno]) {
- ata_down_xfermask_limit(dev, ATA_DNXFER_FORCE_PIO0);
+ if (!tries[dev->devno])
ata_dev_disable(dev);
- }
goto retry;
}
diff --git a/drivers/ata/libata-eh.c b/drivers/ata/libata-eh.c
index 7b61562..1abfdba 100644
--- a/drivers/ata/libata-eh.c
+++ b/drivers/ata/libata-eh.c
@@ -1964,8 +1964,7 @@ static int ata_eh_recover(struct ata_port *ap, ata_prereset_fn_t prereset,
{
struct ata_eh_context *ehc = &ap->eh_context;
struct ata_device *dev;
- int down_xfermask, i, rc;
- int dnxfer_sel;
+ int i, rc;
DPRINTK("ENTER\n");
@@ -1994,7 +1993,6 @@ static int ata_eh_recover(struct ata_port *ap, ata_prereset_fn_t prereset,
}
retry:
- down_xfermask = 0;
rc = 0;
/* if UNLOADING, finish immediately */
@@ -2039,10 +2037,8 @@ static int ata_eh_recover(struct ata_port *ap, ata_prereset_fn_t prereset,
/* configure transfer mode if necessary */
if (ehc->i.flags & ATA_EHI_SETMODE) {
rc = ata_set_mode(ap, &dev);
- if (rc) {
- down_xfermask = 1;
+ if (rc)
goto dev_fail;
- }
ehc->i.flags &= ~ATA_EHI_SETMODE;
}
@@ -2054,22 +2050,27 @@ static int ata_eh_recover(struct ata_port *ap, ata_prereset_fn_t prereset,
goto out;
dev_fail:
+ ehc->tries[dev->devno]--;
+
switch (rc) {
- case -ENODEV:
- /* device missing, schedule probing */
- ehc->i.probe_mask |= (1 << dev->devno);
case -EINVAL:
+ /* eeek, something went very wrong, give up */
ehc->tries[dev->devno] = 0;
break;
+
+ case -ENODEV:
+ /* device missing or wrong IDENTIFY data, schedule probing */
+ ehc->i.probe_mask |= (1 << dev->devno);
+ /* give it just one more chance */
+ ehc->tries[dev->devno] = min(ehc->tries[dev->devno], 1);
case -EIO:
- sata_down_spd_limit(ap);
- default:
- ehc->tries[dev->devno]--;
- dnxfer_sel = ATA_DNXFER_ANY;
- if (ehc->tries[dev->devno] == 1)
- dnxfer_sel = ATA_DNXFER_FORCE_PIO0;
- if (down_xfermask && ata_down_xfermask_limit(dev, dnxfer_sel))
- ehc->tries[dev->devno] = 0;
+ if (ehc->tries[dev->devno] == 1) {
+ /* This is the last chance, better to slow
+ * down than lose it.
+ */
+ sata_down_spd_limit(ap);
+ ata_down_xfermask_limit(dev, ATA_DNXFER_PIO);
+ }
}
if (ata_dev_enabled(dev) && !ehc->tries[dev->devno]) {
--
1.4.4.4
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-02-02 7:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-02-02 7:22 asdf Tejun Heo
2007-02-02 7:22 ` [PATCH 1/5] libata: improve ata_down_xfermask_limit() Tejun Heo
2007-02-20 15:46 ` Jeff Garzik
2007-02-02 7:22 ` Tejun Heo [this message]
2007-02-02 7:22 ` [PATCH 5/5] ahci: consider SDB FIS containing spurious NCQ completions HSM violation Tejun Heo
2007-02-20 15:46 ` Jeff Garzik
2007-02-21 7:34 ` [PATCH 5/5] ahci: consider SDB FIS containing spurious NCQ completions HSM violation (regenerated) Tejun Heo
2007-02-23 10:37 ` Jeff Garzik
2007-02-02 7:22 ` [PATCH 3/5] libata: put some intelligence into EH speed down sequence Tejun Heo
2007-02-02 7:22 ` [PATCH 4/5] libata: kill ATA_DNXFER_ANY Tejun Heo
2007-02-02 7:24 ` Subject is [PATCH,RESEND] libata: put some intelligence into speed down sequence Tejun Heo
2007-02-02 16:59 ` asdf Ric Wheeler
2007-02-03 4:07 ` asdf Tejun Heo
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2007-02-02 7:09 [PATCHSET] ata_piix: improve combined mode handling Tejun Heo
2007-02-02 7:09 ` [PATCH 2/5] libata: improve probe failure handling Tejun Heo
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=11704009503756-git-send-email-htejun@gmail.com \
--to=htejun@gmail.com \
--cc=alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk \
--cc=edmudama@gmail.com \
--cc=jeff@garzik.org \
--cc=linux-ide@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=ric@emc.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.