From: Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Cc: Con Kolivas <kernel@kolivas.org>,
linux list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
ck list <ck@vds.kolivas.org>
Subject: Re: [test] sched: SD-latest versus Mike's latest
Date: Thu, 05 Apr 2007 14:24:37 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1175775877.7144.4.camel@Homer.simpson.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20070405121234.GA30314@elte.hu>
On Thu, 2007-04-05 at 14:12 +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> * Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de> wrote:
>
> > > re-testing the weak points of the vanilla scheduler + Mike's:
> > >
> > > - thud.c: this workload has almost unnoticeable effect
> > > - fiftyp.c: noticeable, but alot better than previously!
> >
> > Hmm. Here fiftyp.c is utterly harmless. If you have a second, can
> > you send me a top snapshot? If you're running many of them, it can
> > take a bit for the throttle to catch them all.
>
> ah, indeed - i ran 10 of them and letting them run for a bit smoothes
> things out.
Ok, I didn't try 10 of them. It can still get a bit ragged here, so I
may have to latch the throttle for a bit to make sure they have to
maintain improved behavior to get unleashed. 5 of them get instantly
nailed, and stay nailed.
-Mike
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-04-05 12:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 92+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-03-28 16:37 [PATCH] sched: staircase deadline misc fixes Con Kolivas
2007-03-28 17:34 ` [ck] " Prakash Punnoor
2007-04-01 6:40 ` Prakash Punnoor
[not found] ` <b14e81f00704010724i3155a16en91074ab789416f3d@mail.gmail.com>
2007-04-01 20:03 ` Prakash Punnoor
2007-03-28 18:48 ` Ingo Molnar
2007-03-28 23:44 ` Con Kolivas
2007-03-29 5:50 ` Mike Galbraith
2007-03-29 6:29 ` Mike Galbraith
2007-03-29 6:54 ` Mike Galbraith
2007-03-29 8:18 ` Mike Galbraith
2007-03-29 12:55 ` [ck] " michael chang
2007-04-03 2:35 ` Con Kolivas
2007-04-03 2:37 ` Con Kolivas
2007-04-03 5:31 ` Mike Galbraith
2007-04-03 6:00 ` Mike Galbraith
2007-04-03 6:01 ` Ingo Molnar
2007-04-03 6:11 ` Mike Galbraith
2007-04-05 11:02 ` Mike Galbraith
2007-04-05 11:09 ` Ingo Molnar
2007-04-05 11:12 ` Mike Galbraith
2007-04-05 11:15 ` Ingo Molnar
2007-04-05 13:18 ` Johannes Stezenbach
2007-04-05 15:28 ` Mike Galbraith
2007-04-05 11:54 ` [test] sched: SD-latest versus Mike's latest Ingo Molnar
2007-04-05 12:10 ` Mike Galbraith
2007-04-05 12:12 ` Ingo Molnar
2007-04-05 12:24 ` Mike Galbraith [this message]
2007-04-05 16:08 ` Con Kolivas
2007-04-05 19:05 ` Ingo Molnar
2007-04-05 20:29 ` Mike Galbraith
2007-04-06 1:03 ` Ten percent test Con Kolivas
2007-04-06 9:07 ` Mike Galbraith
2007-04-06 9:28 ` Con Kolivas
2007-04-06 10:03 ` Ingo Molnar
2007-04-06 10:40 ` Mike Galbraith
2007-04-07 6:50 ` Con Kolivas
2007-04-07 16:12 ` Gene Heskett
2007-04-07 18:08 ` Ingo Molnar
2007-04-07 18:23 ` Gene Heskett
2007-04-07 18:52 ` Ingo Molnar
2007-04-07 20:30 ` Gene Heskett
2007-04-08 10:41 ` Ingo Molnar
2007-04-08 10:58 ` Ingo Molnar
2007-04-08 17:04 ` Gene Heskett
2007-04-09 4:03 ` Mike Galbraith
2007-04-09 4:08 ` Gene Heskett
2007-04-09 5:59 ` Mike Galbraith
2007-04-09 13:01 ` Gene Heskett
2007-04-08 11:33 ` Gene Heskett
2007-04-08 11:40 ` Mike Galbraith
2007-04-08 12:02 ` Mike Galbraith
2007-04-08 17:57 ` Gene Heskett
2007-04-09 4:19 ` Mike Galbraith
2007-04-09 5:23 ` Gene Heskett
2007-04-09 6:09 ` Mike Galbraith
2007-04-08 17:56 ` Gene Heskett
2007-04-09 4:17 ` Mike Galbraith
2007-04-09 5:16 ` Gene Heskett
2007-04-09 6:06 ` Mike Galbraith
2007-04-09 8:24 ` Mike Galbraith
2007-04-08 18:51 ` Rene Herman
2007-04-09 4:23 ` Mike Galbraith
2007-04-09 12:14 ` Rene Herman
2007-04-09 13:27 ` Andreas Mohr
2007-04-09 19:54 ` Rene Herman
2007-04-09 14:15 ` Ingo Molnar
2007-04-09 17:05 ` Rene Herman
2007-04-09 17:48 ` Ingo Molnar
2007-04-09 19:09 ` Rene Herman
2007-04-09 19:56 ` Gene Heskett
2007-04-09 17:10 ` Mike Galbraith
2007-04-09 13:53 ` Ingo Molnar
2007-04-09 15:37 ` Rene Herman
2007-04-07 19:14 ` Mike Galbraith
2007-04-07 20:31 ` Gene Heskett
2007-04-09 17:51 ` William Lee Irwin III
2007-04-09 18:03 ` Ingo Molnar
2007-04-09 18:44 ` William Lee Irwin III
2007-04-07 16:32 ` Mike Galbraith
2007-04-08 13:08 ` Ed Tomlinson
2007-04-09 5:38 ` Mike Galbraith
2007-04-09 11:26 ` Ed Tomlinson
2007-04-09 16:50 ` Mike Galbraith
2007-04-22 10:48 ` [ck] " Martin Steigerwald
2007-04-22 11:15 ` Con Kolivas
2007-04-10 2:39 ` Mike Galbraith
2007-04-10 11:23 ` Ed Tomlinson
2007-04-10 12:04 ` Mike Galbraith
2007-04-06 10:48 ` Mike Galbraith
2007-04-03 10:57 ` [PATCH] sched: staircase deadline misc fixes Mike Galbraith
2007-03-29 6:36 ` Con Kolivas
2007-04-23 8:58 ` Andrew Morton
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1175775877.7144.4.camel@Homer.simpson.net \
--to=efault@gmx.de \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=ck@vds.kolivas.org \
--cc=kernel@kolivas.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.