All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Philippe Gerum <rpm@xenomai.org>
To: Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@domain.hid>
Cc: xenomai-core <xenomai@xenomai.org>
Subject: Re: [Xenomai-core] [BUG] target width of shifts on 64 bits
Date: Wed, 18 Apr 2007 22:07:16 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1176926837.5010.90.camel@domain.hid> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <46265FC8.1070207@domain.hid>

On Wed, 2007-04-18 at 20:13 +0200, Jan Kiszka wrote:
> Hi Philippe,
> 
> here is an explanation of the scalable scheduler issue I face on x86_64
> under different gcc compilers:
> 
>         unsigned long x = 0;
>         int n = 32;
> 
>         x |= 1 << n;
> 
> The last instruction translates to:
> 
> 	mov    0xfffffffffffffffc(%rbp),%ecx
> 	mov    $0x1,%eax
> 	shl    %cl,%eax
> 	cltq
> 	or     %rax,0xfffffffffffffff0(%rbp)
> 

Blast. Good spot.

> That means we only shift with 32-bit precision although the target type
> is 64 bit. We find such code for setting the queue usage bits in
> addmlq(), but probably elsewhere too. This variant lets gcc generate the
> desired code:
> 
> 	x |= (unsigned long)1 << n;
> 
> Compiler issue, x86_64-specific oddity, or generic 64-bit problem we may
> have across the ipipe and Xenomai code (ppc64, ia64?)?
> 

A brief look at the I-pipe code base shows that most shift expressions
have righthand sides limited to small values (at least always < 32), and
when they don't, the lefthand side is properly cast to long long values,
so this should be ok.

BUT, it's a general 64bit port issue for Xenomai, which is not specific
to the multi-level queue implementation. We have the same issue going on
with at least:

- the posix registry
- the message pipe support from the nucleus
- the vrtx id generator

Gentlemen, it's time for bug hunting.

> After patching nucleus/queue.h appropriately, my oopses disappear, but
> RT threads still do not run (no CSW to the threads latency creates).
> Jan
> 
> 
> PS: If you are interested, I could post a modified qemu patch that
> enables gdb kernel debugging under x86_64.
> 

Yes please. I would have a look to the remaining issue I have here
exclusively over qemu, which seems unrelated to the multi-level queue
issue though.

-- 
Philippe.




  reply	other threads:[~2007-04-18 20:07 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2007-04-18 18:13 [Xenomai-core] [BUG] target width of shifts on 64 bits Jan Kiszka
2007-04-18 20:07 ` Philippe Gerum [this message]
2007-04-18 20:27   ` Gilles Chanteperdrix
2007-04-18 21:07     ` Jan Kiszka
2007-04-18 21:30       ` Gilles Chanteperdrix
2007-04-18 22:05         ` Jan Kiszka
2007-04-18 21:07   ` Jan Kiszka
2007-04-23  9:35     ` Jan Kiszka
2007-04-23 10:30       ` Philippe Gerum
2007-04-23 10:37         ` Gilles Chanteperdrix
2007-04-23 10:52           ` Gilles Chanteperdrix
2007-04-23 12:48             ` Jan Kiszka
2007-04-23 13:00               ` Gilles Chanteperdrix
2007-04-23 13:04                 ` Jan Kiszka
2007-04-23 13:08               ` Philippe Gerum

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1176926837.5010.90.camel@domain.hid \
    --to=rpm@xenomai.org \
    --cc=jan.kiszka@domain.hid \
    --cc=xenomai@xenomai.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.