From: jamal <hadi@cyberus.ca>
To: Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Peter P Waskiewicz Jr <peter.p.waskiewicz.jr@intel.com>,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
jgarzik@pobox.com, cramerj@intel.com, auke-jan.h.kok@intel.com,
christopher.leech@intel.com, davem@davemloft.net
Subject: Re: [PATCH] IPROUTE: Modify tc for new PRIO multiqueue behavior
Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2007 07:36:43 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1177501003.4082.20.camel@localhost> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <462ED398.5080405@linux-foundation.org>
On Tue, 2007-24-04 at 21:05 -0700, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
> Peter P Waskiewicz Jr wrote:
> Only if this binary compatiable with older kernels.
It is not. But i think that is a lesser problem, the bigger question is:
Why would you need to change a qdisc just so you can support egress
multiqueues?
BTW, is there any reason this is being cced to lkml?
cheers,
jamal
PS:- I havent read the kernel patches (i am congested and about 1000
messages behind on netdev) and my opinions may be influenced by an
approach i have in trying to help someone fixup a wireless driver with
multiqueue support.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-04-25 11:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 40+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-04-25 1:39 [PATCH] IPROUTE: Modify tc for new PRIO multiqueue behavior Peter P Waskiewicz Jr
2007-04-25 4:05 ` Stephen Hemminger
2007-04-25 11:36 ` jamal [this message]
2007-04-25 17:45 ` Waskiewicz Jr, Peter P
2007-04-26 13:27 ` jamal
2007-04-26 15:57 ` Patrick McHardy
2007-04-26 16:30 ` Waskiewicz Jr, Peter P
2007-04-26 16:44 ` Patrick McHardy
2007-04-26 16:50 ` Waskiewicz Jr, Peter P
2007-04-27 15:09 ` jamal
2007-04-27 15:45 ` Waskiewicz Jr, Peter P
2007-04-30 12:56 ` jamal
2007-05-01 18:27 ` Waskiewicz Jr, Peter P
2007-05-01 22:11 ` jamal
2007-05-01 23:04 ` Waskiewicz Jr, Peter P
2007-05-02 12:43 ` jamal
2007-05-03 21:03 ` Waskiewicz Jr, Peter P
2007-05-03 23:54 ` jamal
2007-05-04 15:48 ` Waskiewicz Jr, Peter P
2007-05-04 20:01 ` Stephen Hemminger
2007-05-04 20:06 ` David Miller
2007-05-04 20:43 ` Waskiewicz Jr, Peter P
2007-05-04 21:00 ` David Miller
2007-05-04 21:22 ` Johannes Berg
2007-05-08 9:33 ` Zhu Yi
2007-05-08 9:45 ` Johannes Berg
2007-05-08 13:28 ` jamal
2007-05-08 15:35 ` Waskiewicz Jr, Peter P
2007-05-08 23:28 ` jamal
2007-05-10 3:02 ` Zhu Yi
2007-05-10 12:35 ` jamal
2007-05-11 1:58 ` Zhu Yi
2007-05-11 2:23 ` jamal
2007-05-10 18:22 ` Waskiewicz Jr, Peter P
2007-05-10 20:00 ` jamal
2007-05-09 14:16 ` Johannes Berg
2007-04-27 14:58 ` jamal
2007-04-27 15:43 ` Jeff Garzik
2007-04-27 15:46 ` Waskiewicz Jr, Peter P
2007-04-26 18:49 ` Jan Engelhardt
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1177501003.4082.20.camel@localhost \
--to=hadi@cyberus.ca \
--cc=auke-jan.h.kok@intel.com \
--cc=christopher.leech@intel.com \
--cc=cramerj@intel.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=jgarzik@pobox.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=peter.p.waskiewicz.jr@intel.com \
--cc=shemminger@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.