All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: jamal <hadi@cyberus.ca>
To: Zhu Yi <yi.zhu@intel.com>
Cc: "Waskiewicz Jr, Peter P" <peter.p.waskiewicz.jr@intel.com>,
	Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net>,
	Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@linux-foundation.org>,
	Patrick McHardy <kaber@trash.net>,
	netdev@vger.kernel.org, jgarzik@pobox.com,
	cramerj <cramerj@intel.com>,
	"Kok, Auke-jan H" <auke-jan.h.kok@intel.com>,
	"Leech, Christopher" <christopher.leech@intel.com>,
	davem@davemloft.net
Subject: RE: [PATCH] IPROUTE: Modify tc for new PRIO multiqueue behavior
Date: Thu, 10 May 2007 22:23:35 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1178850215.4074.6.camel@localhost> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1178848682.3045.82.camel@debian.sh.intel.com>

On Fri, 2007-11-05 at 09:58 +0800, Zhu Yi wrote:

> 
> Good, we agree on this. 

Good start.

> Now let's solve the problem.
> 

Lets take it slowly, because i think i wasnt getting anywhere with
Peter. See if you make sense of what i am saying maybe we can make
progress.

> When the low priority ring buffer is full in the hardware, will you
> suppose the driver call netif_stop_queue() or not? 

Yes, I will. 
With a note: This is precisely what i have been saying all along
in my posting. I explained my reasoning; if you missed the why I think i
should write it up.
So in order to make progress - i am going to not respond to the rest of
the email; tell me if you dont understand me and i will do a write up
hopefully tommorow or over the weekend.
Or tell me you understand me and disagree because of ....

cheers,
jamal


  reply	other threads:[~2007-05-11  2:23 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 40+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2007-04-25  1:39 [PATCH] IPROUTE: Modify tc for new PRIO multiqueue behavior Peter P Waskiewicz Jr
2007-04-25  4:05 ` Stephen Hemminger
2007-04-25 11:36   ` jamal
2007-04-25 17:45     ` Waskiewicz Jr, Peter P
2007-04-26 13:27       ` jamal
2007-04-26 15:57         ` Patrick McHardy
2007-04-26 16:30           ` Waskiewicz Jr, Peter P
2007-04-26 16:44             ` Patrick McHardy
2007-04-26 16:50               ` Waskiewicz Jr, Peter P
2007-04-27 15:09             ` jamal
2007-04-27 15:45               ` Waskiewicz Jr, Peter P
2007-04-30 12:56                 ` jamal
2007-05-01 18:27                   ` Waskiewicz Jr, Peter P
2007-05-01 22:11                     ` jamal
2007-05-01 23:04                       ` Waskiewicz Jr, Peter P
2007-05-02 12:43                         ` jamal
2007-05-03 21:03                           ` Waskiewicz Jr, Peter P
2007-05-03 23:54                             ` jamal
2007-05-04 15:48                               ` Waskiewicz Jr, Peter P
2007-05-04 20:01                             ` Stephen Hemminger
2007-05-04 20:06                               ` David Miller
2007-05-04 20:43                               ` Waskiewicz Jr, Peter P
2007-05-04 21:00                                 ` David Miller
2007-05-04 21:22                                 ` Johannes Berg
2007-05-08  9:33                                   ` Zhu Yi
2007-05-08  9:45                                     ` Johannes Berg
2007-05-08 13:28                                       ` jamal
2007-05-08 15:35                                         ` Waskiewicz Jr, Peter P
2007-05-08 23:28                                           ` jamal
2007-05-10  3:02                                             ` Zhu Yi
2007-05-10 12:35                                               ` jamal
2007-05-11  1:58                                                 ` Zhu Yi
2007-05-11  2:23                                                   ` jamal [this message]
2007-05-10 18:22                                             ` Waskiewicz Jr, Peter P
2007-05-10 20:00                                               ` jamal
2007-05-09 14:16                                         ` Johannes Berg
2007-04-27 14:58           ` jamal
2007-04-27 15:43             ` Jeff Garzik
2007-04-27 15:46               ` Waskiewicz Jr, Peter P
2007-04-26 18:49       ` Jan Engelhardt

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1178850215.4074.6.camel@localhost \
    --to=hadi@cyberus.ca \
    --cc=auke-jan.h.kok@intel.com \
    --cc=christopher.leech@intel.com \
    --cc=cramerj@intel.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=jgarzik@pobox.com \
    --cc=johannes@sipsolutions.net \
    --cc=kaber@trash.net \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=peter.p.waskiewicz.jr@intel.com \
    --cc=shemminger@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=yi.zhu@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.