From: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
To: Marat Buharov <marat.buharov@gmail.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@oracle.com>,
"linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org" <linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [ext3][kernels >= 2.6.20.7 at least] KDE going comatose when FS is under heavy write load (massive starvation)
Date: Fri, 27 Apr 2007 14:30:58 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1177677058.28223.11.camel@twins> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <698310e10704270459t7663d39dp977cf055b8db9d2a@mail.gmail.com>
On Fri, 2007-04-27 at 15:59 +0400, Marat Buharov wrote:
> On 4/27/07, Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> wrote:
> > Aside: why the heck do applications think that their data is so important
> > that they need to fsync it all the time. I used to run a kernel on my
> > laptop which had "return 0;" at the top of fsync() and fdatasync(). Most
> > pleasurable.
>
> So, if having fake fsync() and fdatasync() is pleasurable for laptop
> and desktop, may be it's time to add option into Kconfig which
> disables normal fsync behaviour in favor of robust desktop?
Nah, just teaching user-space to behave themselves should be sufficient;
there is just no way kicker can justify doing a fdatasync(), I mean,
come on its just showing a friggin menu. I have always wondered why that
thing was so damn slow, like it needs to fetch stuff like that from all
four corners of disk, feh!
Just sliding over a sub-menu can take more than a second; I mean, it
_really_ is just faster to just start things from your favourite shell.
No way is globally disabling fsync() a good thing. I guess Andrew just
is a sucker for punishment :-)
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-04-27 12:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 73+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-04-27 7:59 [ext3][kernels >= 2.6.20.7 at least] KDE going comatose when FS is under heavy write load (massive starvation) Mike Galbraith
2007-04-27 8:33 ` Andrew Morton
2007-04-27 9:23 ` Mike Galbraith
2007-04-27 10:17 ` Mike Galbraith
2007-04-27 11:59 ` Marat Buharov
2007-04-27 12:30 ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2007-04-27 13:50 ` Mark Lord
2007-04-27 12:39 ` Manoj Joseph
2007-04-27 15:30 ` Linus Torvalds
2007-04-27 19:31 ` Andreas Dilger
2007-04-27 19:44 ` Mike Galbraith
2007-04-27 19:50 ` Linus Torvalds
2007-04-27 20:05 ` Hua Zhong
2007-04-27 20:12 ` Miquel van Smoorenburg
2007-04-27 20:12 ` Bill Huey
2007-04-28 5:37 ` Mikulas Patocka
2007-04-28 5:45 ` Mikulas Patocka
2007-04-28 21:57 ` Bill Huey
2007-04-28 22:38 ` Mikulas Patocka
2007-04-27 20:29 ` Gabriel C
2007-04-27 20:45 ` Stephen Clark
2007-04-27 20:54 ` Manoj Joseph
2007-04-28 8:45 ` Matthias Andree
2007-04-27 22:18 ` Andrew Morton
2007-05-03 17:38 ` Alex Tomas
2007-05-03 23:54 ` Andrew Morton
2007-05-04 6:18 ` Alex Tomas
2007-05-04 6:38 ` Andrew Morton
2007-05-04 6:57 ` Alex Tomas
2007-05-04 7:18 ` Andrew Morton
2007-05-04 7:39 ` Alex Tomas
2007-05-04 8:02 ` Andrew Morton
2007-08-16 18:20 ` Alex Tomas
2007-08-16 18:46 ` Andrew Morton
2007-08-17 2:24 ` Alex Tomas
2007-08-17 6:52 ` Andrew Morton
2007-08-17 8:36 ` Alex Tomas
2007-08-17 9:02 ` Andrew Morton
2007-08-17 18:42 ` Alex Tomas
2007-04-28 8:44 ` Matthias Andree
2007-04-28 20:46 ` Mikulas Patocka
2007-04-28 21:12 ` Lee Revell
2007-04-29 20:49 ` Mark Lord
2007-04-29 21:17 ` Mikulas Patocka
2007-04-27 15:18 ` Linus Torvalds
2007-04-27 15:41 ` John Anthony Kazos Jr.
2007-04-27 15:54 ` Linus Torvalds
2007-04-27 16:24 ` Chuck Ebbert
2007-04-27 19:43 ` Marko Macek
2007-04-27 18:31 ` Andrew Morton
2007-04-27 19:09 ` Zan Lynx
2007-04-27 22:07 ` Andrew Morton
2007-04-27 19:27 ` Mike Galbraith
2007-04-28 8:51 ` Matthias Andree
2007-04-28 8:59 ` Andrew Morton
2007-04-28 16:30 ` Linus Torvalds
2007-04-28 16:56 ` Paolo Ornati
2007-04-27 19:28 ` Mike Galbraith
2007-04-27 20:06 ` Jan Engelhardt
2007-04-27 21:22 ` Linus Torvalds
2007-04-28 4:25 ` Mike Galbraith
2007-04-28 6:32 ` Mike Galbraith
2007-04-28 7:01 ` Andrew Morton
2007-04-28 7:12 ` Mike Galbraith
2007-04-28 6:32 ` Mikulas Patocka
2007-04-28 16:05 ` Linus Torvalds
2007-04-28 16:37 ` Ingo Molnar
2007-04-28 17:11 ` Mikulas Patocka
2007-04-30 6:57 ` Jens Axboe
2007-04-28 17:55 ` Mikulas Patocka
2007-04-30 6:56 ` Jens Axboe
2007-05-02 6:53 ` Jens Axboe
2007-05-02 7:36 ` Mike Galbraith
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1177677058.28223.11.camel@twins \
--to=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=efault@gmx.de \
--cc=jens.axboe@oracle.com \
--cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=marat.buharov@gmail.com \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.