From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
To: Andi Kleen <ak@suse.de>
Cc: James.Bottomley@hansenpartnership.com,
virtualization@lists.osdl.org,
"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: The virtuailization patches break Voyager.
Date: Sat, 28 Apr 2007 11:13:21 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1177751601.7646.58.camel@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200704281042.48440.ak@suse.de>
On Sat, 2007-04-28 at 10:42 +0200, Andi Kleen wrote:
> On Saturday 28 April 2007 09:52:30 Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote:
> > Eric W. Biederman wrote:
> > > Next time I'm in a really tormenting mood I will fire up my
> > > my ibm ps2 with it's 16Mhz 386 and 6MB and verify that all is working
> > > well there.
> > >
> >
> > Well, that would be interesting. From a subarch perspective, it would
> > just be the normal default, and in theory it should work fine. But I
> > suspect the fpu emulator is probably broken, and non-WP is likely to
> > have rotted,
>
> AFAIK it's been tested occasionally on some embedded 386 systems
> (e.g. by Thomas Gleixner). Probably not with the recent changes though.
Last test was 2.6.21-rc7, where I fixed the non-WP thing. The
FP-emulator seems to work.
Which kind of breakage is new ?
tglx
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-04-28 9:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-04-28 6:40 The virtuailization patches break Voyager Eric W. Biederman
2007-04-28 6:59 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2007-04-28 7:25 ` Eric W. Biederman
2007-04-28 7:52 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2007-04-28 8:32 ` Eric W. Biederman
2007-04-28 8:52 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2007-04-28 9:34 ` Andi Kleen
2007-04-28 16:05 ` James Bottomley
2007-04-28 17:15 ` Andi Kleen
2007-04-28 8:42 ` Andi Kleen
2007-04-28 9:13 ` Thomas Gleixner [this message]
2007-04-28 9:15 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2007-04-28 9:39 ` Andi Kleen
2007-04-28 9:48 ` Thomas Gleixner
2007-04-28 9:15 ` Eric W. Biederman
2007-04-28 9:37 ` Andi Kleen
2007-04-28 15:24 ` Eric W. Biederman
2007-04-28 16:08 ` James Bottomley
2007-04-28 15:54 ` James Bottomley
2007-04-28 17:15 ` Andi Kleen
2007-04-28 16:40 ` H. Peter Anvin
2007-04-28 17:00 ` Eric W. Biederman
2007-04-28 17:07 ` H. Peter Anvin
2007-04-28 15:47 ` James Bottomley
2007-04-28 16:02 ` Eric W. Biederman
2007-04-28 16:18 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2007-04-28 16:20 ` James Bottomley
2007-04-28 17:23 ` Andi Kleen
2007-04-28 17:22 ` Andi Kleen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1177751601.7646.58.camel@localhost.localdomain \
--to=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=James.Bottomley@hansenpartnership.com \
--cc=ak@suse.de \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=ebiederm@xmission.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=virtualization@lists.osdl.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.