From: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
To: Christoph Lameter <clameter@sgi.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
Thomas Graf <tgraf@suug.ch>, David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Daniel Phillips <phillips@google.com>,
Pekka Enberg <penberg@cs.helsinki.fi>,
Matt Mackall <mpm@selenic.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/5] mm: slub allocation fairness
Date: Mon, 14 May 2007 18:14:45 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1179159285.2942.20.camel@lappy> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0705140847330.10442@schroedinger.engr.sgi.com>
On Mon, 2007-05-14 at 08:49 -0700, Christoph Lameter wrote:
> On Mon, 14 May 2007, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
>
> > Index: linux-2.6-git/include/linux/slub_def.h
> > ===================================================================
> > --- linux-2.6-git.orig/include/linux/slub_def.h
> > +++ linux-2.6-git/include/linux/slub_def.h
> > @@ -52,6 +52,7 @@ struct kmem_cache {
> > struct kmem_cache_node *node[MAX_NUMNODES];
> > #endif
> > struct page *cpu_slab[NR_CPUS];
> > + int rank;
> > };
>
> Ranks as part of the kmem_cache structure? I thought this is a temporary
> thing?
No it needs to store the current state to verity subsequent allocations
their gfp flags against.
> > * Lock order:
> > @@ -961,6 +962,8 @@ static struct page *allocate_slab(struct
> > if (!page)
> > return NULL;
> >
> > + s->rank = page->index;
> > +
>
> Argh.... Setting a cache structure field from a page struct field? What
> about concurrency?
Oh, right; allocate_slab is not serialized itself.
> > @@ -1371,8 +1376,12 @@ static void *__slab_alloc(struct kmem_ca
> > gfp_t gfpflags, int node, void *addr, struct page *page)
> > {
> > void **object;
> > - int cpu = smp_processor_id();
> > + int cpu;
> > +
> > + if (page == FORCE_PAGE)
> > + goto force_new;
> >
> > + cpu = smp_processor_id();
> > if (!page)
> > goto new_slab;
> >
> > @@ -1405,6 +1414,7 @@ have_slab:
> > goto load_freelist;
> > }
> >
> > +force_new:
> > page = new_slab(s, gfpflags, node);
> > if (page) {
> > cpu = smp_processor_id();
> > @@ -1465,15 +1475,22 @@ static void __always_inline *slab_alloc(
> > struct page *page;
> > void **object;
> > unsigned long flags;
> > + int rank = slab_alloc_rank(gfpflags);
> >
> > local_irq_save(flags);
> > + if (slab_insufficient_rank(s, rank)) {
> > + page = FORCE_PAGE;
> > + goto force_alloc;
> > + }
> > +
> > page = s->cpu_slab[smp_processor_id()];
> > if (unlikely(!page || !page->lockless_freelist ||
> > - (node != -1 && page_to_nid(page) != node)))
> > + (node != -1 && page_to_nid(page) != node))) {
> >
> > +force_alloc:
> > object = __slab_alloc(s, gfpflags, node, addr, page);
> >
> > - else {
> > + } else {
> > object = page->lockless_freelist;
> > page->lockless_freelist = object[page->offset];
> > }
>
> This is the hot path. No modifications please.
Yes it is, but sorry, I have to. I really need to validate each slab
alloc its GFP flags. Thats what the whole thing is about, I thought you
understood that.
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
To: Christoph Lameter <clameter@sgi.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
Thomas Graf <tgraf@suug.ch>, David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Daniel Phillips <phillips@google.com>,
Pekka Enberg <penberg@cs.helsinki.fi>,
Matt Mackall <mpm@selenic.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/5] mm: slub allocation fairness
Date: Mon, 14 May 2007 18:14:45 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1179159285.2942.20.camel@lappy> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0705140847330.10442@schroedinger.engr.sgi.com>
On Mon, 2007-05-14 at 08:49 -0700, Christoph Lameter wrote:
> On Mon, 14 May 2007, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
>
> > Index: linux-2.6-git/include/linux/slub_def.h
> > ===================================================================
> > --- linux-2.6-git.orig/include/linux/slub_def.h
> > +++ linux-2.6-git/include/linux/slub_def.h
> > @@ -52,6 +52,7 @@ struct kmem_cache {
> > struct kmem_cache_node *node[MAX_NUMNODES];
> > #endif
> > struct page *cpu_slab[NR_CPUS];
> > + int rank;
> > };
>
> Ranks as part of the kmem_cache structure? I thought this is a temporary
> thing?
No it needs to store the current state to verity subsequent allocations
their gfp flags against.
> > * Lock order:
> > @@ -961,6 +962,8 @@ static struct page *allocate_slab(struct
> > if (!page)
> > return NULL;
> >
> > + s->rank = page->index;
> > +
>
> Argh.... Setting a cache structure field from a page struct field? What
> about concurrency?
Oh, right; allocate_slab is not serialized itself.
> > @@ -1371,8 +1376,12 @@ static void *__slab_alloc(struct kmem_ca
> > gfp_t gfpflags, int node, void *addr, struct page *page)
> > {
> > void **object;
> > - int cpu = smp_processor_id();
> > + int cpu;
> > +
> > + if (page == FORCE_PAGE)
> > + goto force_new;
> >
> > + cpu = smp_processor_id();
> > if (!page)
> > goto new_slab;
> >
> > @@ -1405,6 +1414,7 @@ have_slab:
> > goto load_freelist;
> > }
> >
> > +force_new:
> > page = new_slab(s, gfpflags, node);
> > if (page) {
> > cpu = smp_processor_id();
> > @@ -1465,15 +1475,22 @@ static void __always_inline *slab_alloc(
> > struct page *page;
> > void **object;
> > unsigned long flags;
> > + int rank = slab_alloc_rank(gfpflags);
> >
> > local_irq_save(flags);
> > + if (slab_insufficient_rank(s, rank)) {
> > + page = FORCE_PAGE;
> > + goto force_alloc;
> > + }
> > +
> > page = s->cpu_slab[smp_processor_id()];
> > if (unlikely(!page || !page->lockless_freelist ||
> > - (node != -1 && page_to_nid(page) != node)))
> > + (node != -1 && page_to_nid(page) != node))) {
> >
> > +force_alloc:
> > object = __slab_alloc(s, gfpflags, node, addr, page);
> >
> > - else {
> > + } else {
> > object = page->lockless_freelist;
> > page->lockless_freelist = object[page->offset];
> > }
>
> This is the hot path. No modifications please.
Yes it is, but sorry, I have to. I really need to validate each slab
alloc its GFP flags. Thats what the whole thing is about, I thought you
understood that.
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-05-14 16:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 138+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-05-14 13:19 [PATCH 0/5] make slab gfp fair Peter Zijlstra
2007-05-14 13:19 ` Peter Zijlstra
2007-05-14 13:19 ` [PATCH 1/5] mm: page allocation rank Peter Zijlstra
2007-05-14 13:19 ` Peter Zijlstra
2007-05-14 13:19 ` [PATCH 2/5] mm: slab allocation fairness Peter Zijlstra
2007-05-14 13:19 ` Peter Zijlstra
2007-05-14 15:51 ` Christoph Lameter
2007-05-14 15:51 ` Christoph Lameter
2007-05-14 13:19 ` [PATCH 3/5] mm: slub " Peter Zijlstra
2007-05-14 13:19 ` Peter Zijlstra
2007-05-14 15:49 ` Christoph Lameter
2007-05-14 15:49 ` Christoph Lameter
2007-05-14 16:14 ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2007-05-14 16:14 ` Peter Zijlstra
2007-05-14 16:35 ` Christoph Lameter
2007-05-14 16:35 ` Christoph Lameter
2007-05-14 13:19 ` [PATCH 4/5] mm: slob " Peter Zijlstra
2007-05-14 13:19 ` Peter Zijlstra
2007-05-14 13:19 ` [PATCH 5/5] mm: allow mempool to fall back to memalloc reserves Peter Zijlstra
2007-05-14 13:19 ` Peter Zijlstra
2007-05-14 15:53 ` [PATCH 0/5] make slab gfp fair Christoph Lameter
2007-05-14 15:53 ` Christoph Lameter
2007-05-14 16:10 ` Peter Zijlstra
2007-05-14 16:10 ` Peter Zijlstra
2007-05-14 16:37 ` Christoph Lameter
2007-05-14 16:37 ` Christoph Lameter
2007-05-14 16:12 ` Matt Mackall
2007-05-14 16:12 ` Matt Mackall
2007-05-14 16:29 ` Christoph Lameter
2007-05-14 16:29 ` Christoph Lameter
2007-05-14 17:40 ` Peter Zijlstra
2007-05-14 17:40 ` Peter Zijlstra
2007-05-14 17:57 ` Christoph Lameter
2007-05-14 17:57 ` Christoph Lameter
2007-05-14 19:28 ` Peter Zijlstra
2007-05-14 19:28 ` Peter Zijlstra
2007-05-14 19:56 ` Christoph Lameter
2007-05-14 19:56 ` Christoph Lameter
2007-05-14 20:03 ` Peter Zijlstra
2007-05-14 20:03 ` Peter Zijlstra
2007-05-14 20:06 ` Christoph Lameter
2007-05-14 20:06 ` Christoph Lameter
2007-05-14 20:12 ` Peter Zijlstra
2007-05-14 20:12 ` Peter Zijlstra
2007-05-14 20:25 ` Christoph Lameter
2007-05-14 20:25 ` Christoph Lameter
2007-05-15 17:27 ` Peter Zijlstra
2007-05-15 17:27 ` Peter Zijlstra
2007-05-15 22:02 ` Christoph Lameter
2007-05-15 22:02 ` Christoph Lameter
2007-05-16 6:59 ` Peter Zijlstra
2007-05-16 6:59 ` Peter Zijlstra
2007-05-16 18:43 ` Christoph Lameter
2007-05-16 18:43 ` Christoph Lameter
2007-05-16 19:25 ` Peter Zijlstra
2007-05-16 19:25 ` Peter Zijlstra
2007-05-16 19:53 ` Christoph Lameter
2007-05-16 19:53 ` Christoph Lameter
2007-05-16 20:18 ` Peter Zijlstra
2007-05-16 20:18 ` Peter Zijlstra
2007-05-16 20:27 ` Christoph Lameter
2007-05-16 20:27 ` Christoph Lameter
2007-05-16 20:40 ` Peter Zijlstra
2007-05-16 20:40 ` Peter Zijlstra
2007-05-16 20:44 ` Christoph Lameter
2007-05-16 20:44 ` Christoph Lameter
2007-05-16 20:54 ` Peter Zijlstra
2007-05-16 20:54 ` Peter Zijlstra
2007-05-16 20:59 ` Christoph Lameter
2007-05-16 20:59 ` Christoph Lameter
2007-05-16 21:04 ` Peter Zijlstra
2007-05-16 21:04 ` Peter Zijlstra
2007-05-16 21:13 ` Christoph Lameter
2007-05-16 21:13 ` Christoph Lameter
2007-05-16 21:20 ` Peter Zijlstra
2007-05-16 21:20 ` Peter Zijlstra
2007-05-16 21:42 ` Christoph Lameter
2007-05-16 21:42 ` Christoph Lameter
2007-05-17 7:28 ` Peter Zijlstra
2007-05-17 7:28 ` Peter Zijlstra
2007-05-17 17:30 ` Christoph Lameter
2007-05-17 17:30 ` Christoph Lameter
2007-05-17 17:53 ` Peter Zijlstra
2007-05-17 17:53 ` Peter Zijlstra
2007-05-17 18:01 ` Christoph Lameter
2007-05-17 18:01 ` Christoph Lameter
2007-05-14 19:44 ` Andrew Morton
2007-05-14 19:44 ` Andrew Morton
2007-05-14 20:01 ` Matt Mackall
2007-05-14 20:01 ` Matt Mackall
2007-05-14 20:05 ` Peter Zijlstra
2007-05-14 20:05 ` Peter Zijlstra
2007-05-17 3:02 ` Christoph Lameter
2007-05-17 3:02 ` Christoph Lameter
2007-05-17 7:08 ` Peter Zijlstra
2007-05-17 7:08 ` Peter Zijlstra
2007-05-17 17:29 ` Christoph Lameter
2007-05-17 17:29 ` Christoph Lameter
2007-05-17 17:52 ` Peter Zijlstra
2007-05-17 17:52 ` Peter Zijlstra
2007-05-17 17:59 ` Christoph Lameter
2007-05-17 17:59 ` Christoph Lameter
2007-05-17 17:53 ` Matt Mackall
2007-05-17 17:53 ` Matt Mackall
2007-05-17 18:02 ` Christoph Lameter
2007-05-17 18:02 ` Christoph Lameter
2007-05-17 19:18 ` Peter Zijlstra
2007-05-17 19:18 ` Peter Zijlstra
2007-05-17 19:24 ` Christoph Lameter
2007-05-17 19:24 ` Christoph Lameter
2007-05-17 21:26 ` Peter Zijlstra
2007-05-17 21:26 ` Peter Zijlstra
2007-05-17 21:44 ` Paul Jackson
2007-05-17 21:44 ` Paul Jackson
2007-05-17 22:27 ` Christoph Lameter
2007-05-17 22:27 ` Christoph Lameter
2007-05-18 9:54 ` Peter Zijlstra
2007-05-18 9:54 ` Peter Zijlstra
2007-05-18 17:11 ` Paul Jackson
2007-05-18 17:11 ` Paul Jackson
2007-05-18 17:11 ` Christoph Lameter
2007-05-18 17:11 ` Christoph Lameter
2007-05-20 8:39 ` Peter Zijlstra
2007-05-20 8:39 ` Peter Zijlstra
2007-05-21 16:45 ` Christoph Lameter
2007-05-21 16:45 ` Christoph Lameter
2007-05-21 19:33 ` Peter Zijlstra
2007-05-21 19:33 ` Peter Zijlstra
2007-05-21 19:43 ` Christoph Lameter
2007-05-21 19:43 ` Christoph Lameter
2007-05-21 20:08 ` Peter Zijlstra
2007-05-21 20:08 ` Peter Zijlstra
2007-05-21 20:32 ` Christoph Lameter
2007-05-21 20:32 ` Christoph Lameter
2007-05-21 20:54 ` Peter Zijlstra
2007-05-21 20:54 ` Peter Zijlstra
2007-05-21 21:04 ` Christoph Lameter
2007-05-21 21:04 ` Christoph Lameter
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1179159285.2942.20.camel@lappy \
--to=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=clameter@sgi.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mpm@selenic.com \
--cc=penberg@cs.helsinki.fi \
--cc=phillips@google.com \
--cc=tgraf@suug.ch \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.