From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
To: sachinp@in.ibm.com
Cc: Olof Johansson <olof@lixom.net>,
linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org, Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>,
kexec@lists.infradead.org, Milton Miller II <miltonm@us.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [Patch ] Kexec/Kdump support - POWER6
Date: Sat, 26 May 2007 08:43:07 +1000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1180132987.19517.9.camel@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4656A488.2020507@in.ibm.com>
>
> /* TODO: Use bulk call */
> - for (i = 0; i < hpte_count; i++)
> - plpar_pte_remove_raw(0, i, 0, &dummy1, &dummy2);
> + for (i = 0; i < hpte_count; i++) {
> + /* dont remove HPTEs with VRMA mappings */
> + lpar_rc = plpar_pte_remove_raw(H_ANDCOND, i, VRMA_HPTE_B_1TB,
> + &dummy1, &dummy2);
If you're going to use the B (1T segment) bit instead of the bolted bit,
at least define a proper constant in line with the existing naming of
the hash table constants in mmu-hash64.h. I would suggest doing the same
with the VRMA_MASK/VALUE thing and calling it HPTE_V_VRMA_MASK or
something similar.
> + if (lpar_rc == H_NOT_FOUND) {
> + lpar_rc = plpar_pte_read_raw(0, i, &dword0, &dummy1);
> + if (!lpar_rc &&
> + (((dword0 >> 24) & VRMA_MASK) != VRMA_MASK))
> + /* Can be hpte for 1TB Seg. So remove it */
> + plpar_pte_remove_raw(0, i, 0, &dummy1, &dummy2);
> + }
> + }
> }
In addition, I would recommend following Michael's advice and using
using the bulk remove Hcall whenever possible.
Cheers,
Ben.
_______________________________________________
kexec mailing list
kexec@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/kexec
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
To: sachinp@in.ibm.com
Cc: Olof Johansson <olof@lixom.net>,
linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org, Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>,
kexec@lists.infradead.org, Milton Miller II <miltonm@us.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [Patch ] Kexec/Kdump support - POWER6
Date: Sat, 26 May 2007 08:43:07 +1000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1180132987.19517.9.camel@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4656A488.2020507@in.ibm.com>
>
> /* TODO: Use bulk call */
> - for (i = 0; i < hpte_count; i++)
> - plpar_pte_remove_raw(0, i, 0, &dummy1, &dummy2);
> + for (i = 0; i < hpte_count; i++) {
> + /* dont remove HPTEs with VRMA mappings */
> + lpar_rc = plpar_pte_remove_raw(H_ANDCOND, i, VRMA_HPTE_B_1TB,
> + &dummy1, &dummy2);
If you're going to use the B (1T segment) bit instead of the bolted bit,
at least define a proper constant in line with the existing naming of
the hash table constants in mmu-hash64.h. I would suggest doing the same
with the VRMA_MASK/VALUE thing and calling it HPTE_V_VRMA_MASK or
something similar.
> + if (lpar_rc == H_NOT_FOUND) {
> + lpar_rc = plpar_pte_read_raw(0, i, &dword0, &dummy1);
> + if (!lpar_rc &&
> + (((dword0 >> 24) & VRMA_MASK) != VRMA_MASK))
> + /* Can be hpte for 1TB Seg. So remove it */
> + plpar_pte_remove_raw(0, i, 0, &dummy1, &dummy2);
> + }
> + }
> }
In addition, I would recommend following Michael's advice and using
using the bulk remove Hcall whenever possible.
Cheers,
Ben.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-05-25 22:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-05-22 12:22 [Patch 0/2] Kexec/Kdump support POWER6 Sachin P. Sant
2007-05-22 12:24 ` [Patch 1/2] " Sachin P. Sant
2007-05-22 12:26 ` [Patch 2/2] " Sachin P. Sant
2007-05-22 15:34 ` Olof Johansson
2007-05-23 5:13 ` Sachin P. Sant
2007-05-23 5:14 ` Sachin P. Sant
2007-05-23 9:37 ` [Patch 2/2] Kexec/Kdump support - POWER6 Sachin P. Sant
2007-05-23 10:55 ` Paul Mackerras
2007-05-24 12:17 ` Mohan Kumar M
2007-05-24 12:17 ` Mohan Kumar M
2007-05-24 14:21 ` Olof Johansson
2007-05-24 14:21 ` Olof Johansson
2007-05-25 8:55 ` [Patch ] " Sachin P. Sant
2007-05-25 8:55 ` Sachin P. Sant
2007-05-25 22:43 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt [this message]
2007-05-25 22:43 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2007-05-28 11:40 ` Sachin P. Sant
2007-05-28 11:40 ` Sachin P. Sant
2007-05-28 21:31 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2007-05-28 21:31 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2007-05-29 6:18 ` Sachin P. Sant
2007-05-29 6:18 ` Sachin P. Sant
2007-05-29 6:58 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2007-05-29 6:58 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2007-05-29 10:14 ` Michael Ellerman
2007-05-29 10:14 ` Michael Ellerman
2007-05-29 11:06 ` Stephen Rothwell
2007-05-29 11:06 ` Stephen Rothwell
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1180132987.19517.9.camel@localhost.localdomain \
--to=benh@kernel.crashing.org \
--cc=kexec@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org \
--cc=miltonm@us.ibm.com \
--cc=olof@lixom.net \
--cc=paulus@samba.org \
--cc=sachinp@in.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.