Re: new repo layout?

[Hollis Blanchard <hollisb@us.ibm.com>]

On Mon, 2007-06-04 at 13:02 -0600, Alex Williamson wrote:
> On Mon, 2007-06-04 at 12:46 -0500, Hollis Blanchard wrote:
> > On Mon, 2007-06-04 at 11:25 -0600, Alex Williamson wrote:
> > > 
> > > > Another option would be to move the ia64 and ppc trees into separate
> > > > subdirectories of /ext/. I'm open to other alternatives.
> > > 
> > >    So far, this sounds like the best option.  This way it would work
> > > just like the staging tree builds and would hopefully be less likely
> > > to get broken.  We might also gain some flexibility in being able to
> > > create new repos in the subdirectory.  Thanks,
> > 
> > If you're suggesting moving all PPC repositories, including the Linux
> > tree, into http://xenbits.xensource.com/ext/powerpc/ , then that's fine
> > with me.
> 
>   Yep, I think this is the way to go.  So we'll have:
> 
> http://xenbits.xensource.com/ext/powerpc/
> http://xenbits.xensource.com/ext/ia64/
> 
> Each will have a linux-2.6.18-xen.hg repo in it that will be maintained
> by the arch maintainers and used for pulls into upstream.  The default
> arch Xen branch needs to be moved into the directory as well.  I also
> think it might be good to standardize on names.  I'd like the
> xen-ia64-unstable.hg repo to be renamed to xen-unstable.hg.  This way
> we'll end up with common names like:
> 
> /xen-unstable.hg
> /linux-2.6.18-xen.hg
> /staging/xen-unstable.hg
> /staging/linux-2.6.18-xen.hg
> /ext/ia64/xen-unstable.hg
> /ext/ia64/linux-2.6.18-xen.hg
> 
> Sound good?  Thanks,

Sounds good to me.

-- 
Hollis Blanchard
IBM Linux Technology Center