From: Bryan Wu <bryan.wu@analog.com>
To: Robin Getz <rgetz@blackfin.uclinux.org>
Cc: Bernd Schmidt <bernds_cb1@t-online.de>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>,
"Wu, Bryan" <Bryan.Wu@analog.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Greg Ungerer <gerg@snapgear.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH, RFD]: Unbreak no-mmu mmap
Date: Wed, 20 Jun 2007 10:38:57 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1182307137.31771.1.camel@roc-desktop> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200706191926.20210.rgetz@blackfin.uclinux.org>
On Tue, 2007-06-19 at 19:26 -0400, Robin Getz wrote:
> On Fri 8 Jun 2007 09:53, Bernd Schmidt pondered:
> > Here's a patch to move nommu mmap/munmap ever so slightly closer to mmu
> > behaviour. The motivation for this is to be able to deselect uClibc's
> > UCLIBC_UCLINUX_BROKEN_MUNMAP config option, which speeds up malloc a
> > fair bit. I'm interested in comments whether this is a good direction
> > to go. The patch is against Linus' tree as of a few minutes ago.
>
> I'm assuming that since no one had any large objections, that this is OK, and
> we should send to Andrew to live in -mm for awhile?
>
> -Robin
Yes, IMO it is fine for kernel and uclibc. Is there any comments from
David and Greg?
Thanks
- Bryan
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-06-20 2:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-06-08 13:53 [PATCH, RFD]: Unbreak no-mmu mmap Bernd Schmidt
2007-06-09 19:10 ` Matt Mackall
2007-06-11 21:08 ` Robin Getz
2007-06-11 22:09 ` Mike Frysinger
2007-06-11 23:04 ` Bernd Schmidt
2007-06-11 23:22 ` Mike Frysinger
2007-06-19 23:26 ` Robin Getz
2007-06-20 2:38 ` Bryan Wu [this message]
2007-06-20 3:00 ` Paul Mundt
2007-06-20 3:18 ` Bryan Wu
2007-06-27 5:50 ` Greg Ungerer
2007-06-22 12:59 ` David Howells
2007-06-22 13:35 ` David Howells
2007-06-22 14:29 ` [PATCH] NOMMU: " David Howells
2007-08-01 12:29 ` [PATCH, RFD]: " David Howells
2007-08-03 14:03 ` [PATCH] NOMMU: Separate out VMAs David Howells
2007-08-07 13:12 ` Bernd Schmidt
2007-08-07 13:17 ` David Howells
2007-08-07 13:21 ` David Howells
2007-08-07 13:37 ` Bernd Schmidt
2007-08-07 14:03 ` David Howells
2007-08-17 11:49 ` Bernd Schmidt
2007-08-20 15:12 ` David Howells
2007-08-20 16:02 ` Bernd Schmidt
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1182307137.31771.1.camel@roc-desktop \
--to=bryan.wu@analog.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=bernds_cb1@t-online.de \
--cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
--cc=gerg@snapgear.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rgetz@blackfin.uclinux.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.