Re: [PATCH] Fixes spurious system load spikes in /proc/loadavgrt

[Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>]

On Fri, 2007-08-17 at 09:24 -0700, Daniel Walker wrote:
> > > It would be nice if you explained better what the code defect was, and
> > > how you fixed it .. One could extract that from the code, but it's nice
> > > if it's backed up with a text description.. Also you should CC lkml next
> > > time.
> > 
> > It would be nice if you'd stop being uber schoolmasterly. Luis
> > explanation of the defect is entirely clear and the resulting fix is
> > obvious. .. You could really look at the patch and figure out your self,
> > that it needs no text description at all. Also you should comment on the
> > nice patch itself next time.
> 
> If all you've said was true I wouldn't have commented on it. There was
> no text description of the code defect, and yes as I said I can get it
> from the code but it's _nice_ when it's backed up with a text
> description ..

You really start to annoy me. There was a detailed bug description and
the code defect is easy to see. If you neither have the interest nor the
time to look at the actual _trivial_ _self explaining_ patch, then
please look for some other playground to live out your wisenheimer airs
and graces.

> If your just going to start flames Thomas take it off list.

Flames are only flames when they happen in public.

	tglx