Re: [PATCH 04/10] mm: slub: add knowledge of reserve pages

[Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 948 bytes --]

On Mon, 2007-08-20 at 12:12 +0300, Pekka J Enberg wrote:
> Hi Peter,
> 
> On Mon, 20 Aug 2007, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > -static struct page *new_slab(struct kmem_cache *s, gfp_t flags, int node)
> > +static struct page *new_slab(struct kmem_cache *s, gfp_t flags, int node, int *reserve)
> >  {
> 
> [snip]
> 
> > +	*reserve = page->reserve;
> 
> Any reason why the callers that are actually interested in this don't do 
> page->reserve on their own?

because new_slab() destroys the content?

struct page {
	...
	union {
		pgoff_t index;		/* Our offset within mapping. */
		void *freelist;		/* SLUB: freelist req. slab lock */
		int reserve;		/* page_alloc: page is a reserve page */
		atomic_t frag_count;	/* skb fragment use count */
	};
	...
};

static struct page *new_slab(struct kmem_cache *s, gfp_t flags, int node, int *reserve)
{
	...
	*reserve = page->reserve;
	...
	page->freelist = start;
	...
}


[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]