All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Heiko Stuebner <heiko@sntech.de>
To: Diederik de Haas <diederik@cknow-tech.com>,
	Joachim Eastwood <joachim.eastwood@gmail.com>
Cc: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>,
	Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@kernel.org>,
	Conor Dooley <conor+dt@kernel.org>,
	devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/12] arm64: dts: rockchip: Add NanoPi M6 board
Date: Tue, 07 Jul 2026 21:11:10 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <118899013.nniJfEyVGO@phil> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAPSPb=tZ1FenNfEM5P+DWcksKvpQjyQQjAWTRdyxb7=YYxY_rw@mail.gmail.com>

Am Freitag, 3. Juli 2026, 22:23:32 Mitteleuropäische Sommerzeit schrieb Joachim Eastwood:
> Hi Diederik,
> 
> On Fri, 3 Jul 2026 at 13:30, Diederik de Haas <diederik@cknow-tech.com> wrote:
> >
> > On Fri Jul 3, 2026 at 12:07 AM CEST, Joachim Eastwood via B4 Relay wrote:
> > > This patch series add support for the NanoPi M6. This board is very
> > > similar to the NanoPi R6C and R6S boards which are already supported.
> > >
> > > Main differences:
> > > * M.2 M-key slot with PCIe (Also present on R6C)
> > > * M.2 E-key slot with PCIe and USB (from hub)
> > > * 1 additional USB 2.0 port from an on-board USB hub
> > > * RT5616 audio CODEC
> >
> > This seems to be the M6 (2405 aka 'V1')?
> Yes, correct. This patch set is for the original M6 board. V1 if you like.
> 
> > Because there is now also a M6V2 (2603), which uses an ES8389 CODEC:
> > https://www.friendlyelec.com/index.php?route=product/product&path=69&product_id=319
> I did notice there was a new version, but I hadn't given it much thought.
> 
> > Is it useful to already take the 2 M6 variants into account with this patch set?
> Yes, I think you are right.
> 
> How about this setup:
> rk3588s-nanopi-m6.dtsi
> rk3588s-nanopi-m6v1.dts
> rk3588s-nanopi-m6v2.dts
> This mimics the setup for the R6 series boards with rk3588s-nanopi-r6.dtsi
> and rk3588s-nanopi-r6[cs].dts.

yes, that would be the nicest way I think.

Thanks for taking this into account
Heiko



_______________________________________________
Linux-rockchip mailing list
Linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-rockchip

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Heiko Stuebner <heiko@sntech.de>
To: Diederik de Haas <diederik@cknow-tech.com>,
	Joachim Eastwood <joachim.eastwood@gmail.com>
Cc: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>,
	Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@kernel.org>,
	Conor Dooley <conor+dt@kernel.org>,
	devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/12] arm64: dts: rockchip: Add NanoPi M6 board
Date: Tue, 07 Jul 2026 21:11:10 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <118899013.nniJfEyVGO@phil> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAPSPb=tZ1FenNfEM5P+DWcksKvpQjyQQjAWTRdyxb7=YYxY_rw@mail.gmail.com>

Am Freitag, 3. Juli 2026, 22:23:32 Mitteleuropäische Sommerzeit schrieb Joachim Eastwood:
> Hi Diederik,
> 
> On Fri, 3 Jul 2026 at 13:30, Diederik de Haas <diederik@cknow-tech.com> wrote:
> >
> > On Fri Jul 3, 2026 at 12:07 AM CEST, Joachim Eastwood via B4 Relay wrote:
> > > This patch series add support for the NanoPi M6. This board is very
> > > similar to the NanoPi R6C and R6S boards which are already supported.
> > >
> > > Main differences:
> > > * M.2 M-key slot with PCIe (Also present on R6C)
> > > * M.2 E-key slot with PCIe and USB (from hub)
> > > * 1 additional USB 2.0 port from an on-board USB hub
> > > * RT5616 audio CODEC
> >
> > This seems to be the M6 (2405 aka 'V1')?
> Yes, correct. This patch set is for the original M6 board. V1 if you like.
> 
> > Because there is now also a M6V2 (2603), which uses an ES8389 CODEC:
> > https://www.friendlyelec.com/index.php?route=product/product&path=69&product_id=319
> I did notice there was a new version, but I hadn't given it much thought.
> 
> > Is it useful to already take the 2 M6 variants into account with this patch set?
> Yes, I think you are right.
> 
> How about this setup:
> rk3588s-nanopi-m6.dtsi
> rk3588s-nanopi-m6v1.dts
> rk3588s-nanopi-m6v2.dts
> This mimics the setup for the R6 series boards with rk3588s-nanopi-r6.dtsi
> and rk3588s-nanopi-r6[cs].dts.

yes, that would be the nicest way I think.

Thanks for taking this into account
Heiko




  parent reply	other threads:[~2026-07-07 19:11 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 56+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-07-02 22:07 [PATCH 00/12] arm64: dts: rockchip: Add NanoPi M6 board Joachim Eastwood via B4 Relay
2026-07-02 22:07 ` Joachim Eastwood
2026-07-02 22:07 ` Joachim Eastwood via B4 Relay
2026-07-02 22:07 ` [PATCH 01/12] dt-bindings: arm: rockchip: add FriendlyElec NanoPi M6 Joachim Eastwood via B4 Relay
2026-07-02 22:07   ` Joachim Eastwood
2026-07-02 22:07   ` Joachim Eastwood via B4 Relay
2026-07-03 10:57   ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2026-07-03 10:57     ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2026-07-02 22:07 ` [PATCH 02/12] arm64: dts: rockchip: refactor rk3588s-nanopi* to support M6 Joachim Eastwood via B4 Relay
2026-07-02 22:07   ` Joachim Eastwood
2026-07-02 22:07   ` Joachim Eastwood via B4 Relay
2026-07-02 22:07 ` [PATCH 03/12] arm64: dts: rockchip: move NanoPi R6 code into common dtsi Joachim Eastwood via B4 Relay
2026-07-02 22:07   ` Joachim Eastwood
2026-07-02 22:07   ` Joachim Eastwood via B4 Relay
2026-07-02 22:07 ` [PATCH 04/12] arm64: dts: rockchip: rk3588s-nanopi: add missing sdmmc cd pinctrl Joachim Eastwood via B4 Relay
2026-07-02 22:07   ` Joachim Eastwood
2026-07-02 22:07   ` Joachim Eastwood via B4 Relay
2026-07-02 22:07 ` [PATCH 05/12] arm64: dts: rockchip: rk3588s-nanopi: remove pull up on rtc int pin Joachim Eastwood via B4 Relay
2026-07-02 22:07   ` Joachim Eastwood
2026-07-02 22:07   ` Joachim Eastwood via B4 Relay
2026-07-02 22:07 ` [PATCH 06/12] arm64: dts: rockchip: rk3588s-nanopi: add missing pcie rst pinctrl Joachim Eastwood via B4 Relay
2026-07-02 22:07   ` Joachim Eastwood via B4 Relay
2026-07-02 22:07   ` Joachim Eastwood
2026-07-02 22:07 ` [PATCH 07/12] arm64: dts: rockchip: rk3588s-nanopi: pcie2x1l2: add clkreq Joachim Eastwood via B4 Relay
2026-07-02 22:07   ` Joachim Eastwood via B4 Relay
2026-07-02 22:07   ` Joachim Eastwood
2026-07-02 22:07 ` [PATCH 08/12] arm64: dts: rockchip: rk3588s-nanopi: remove always-on from vdd_npu_s0 reg Joachim Eastwood via B4 Relay
2026-07-02 22:07   ` Joachim Eastwood via B4 Relay
2026-07-02 22:07   ` Joachim Eastwood
2026-07-02 22:07 ` [PATCH 09/12] arm64: dts: rockchip: rk3588s-nanopi: remove useless vcc_3v3_pcie20 Joachim Eastwood via B4 Relay
2026-07-02 22:07   ` Joachim Eastwood
2026-07-02 22:07   ` Joachim Eastwood via B4 Relay
2026-07-03 10:58   ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2026-07-03 10:58     ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2026-07-02 22:07 ` [PATCH 10/12] arm64: dts: rockchip: rk3588s-nanopi: add gmac1 add phy-supply Joachim Eastwood via B4 Relay
2026-07-02 22:07   ` Joachim Eastwood
2026-07-02 22:07   ` Joachim Eastwood via B4 Relay
2026-07-02 22:07 ` [PATCH 11/12] arm64: dts: rockchip: rk3588s-nanopi: remove bogus vcc5v0_usb regulator Joachim Eastwood via B4 Relay
2026-07-02 22:07   ` Joachim Eastwood
2026-07-02 22:07   ` Joachim Eastwood via B4 Relay
2026-07-02 22:07 ` [PATCH 12/12] arm64: dts: rockchip: add support for NanoPi M6 board Joachim Eastwood via B4 Relay
2026-07-02 22:07   ` Joachim Eastwood via B4 Relay
2026-07-02 22:07   ` Joachim Eastwood
2026-07-03 11:34   ` Diederik de Haas
2026-07-03 11:34     ` Diederik de Haas
2026-07-03 17:14     ` Joachim Eastwood
2026-07-03 17:14       ` Joachim Eastwood
2026-07-03 17:37       ` Diederik de Haas
2026-07-03 11:30 ` [PATCH 00/12] arm64: dts: rockchip: Add " Diederik de Haas
2026-07-03 11:30   ` Diederik de Haas
2026-07-03 20:23   ` Joachim Eastwood
2026-07-03 20:23     ` Joachim Eastwood
2026-07-04  9:54     ` Diederik de Haas
2026-07-04  9:54       ` Diederik de Haas
2026-07-07 19:11     ` Heiko Stuebner [this message]
2026-07-07 19:11       ` Heiko Stuebner

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=118899013.nniJfEyVGO@phil \
    --to=heiko@sntech.de \
    --cc=conor+dt@kernel.org \
    --cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=diederik@cknow-tech.com \
    --cc=joachim.eastwood@gmail.com \
    --cc=krzk+dt@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=robh@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.