All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
To: Nick Piggin <nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@polymtl.ca>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: 2.6.23-rc4-mm1 compile error for ppc 32
Date: Sat, 08 Sep 2007 18:42:10 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1189269730.5972.163.camel@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200709081136.46605.nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au>


> > If so, the finger points at this:
> >
> > static __inline__ void __clear_bit_unlock(int nr, volatile unsigned long
> > *addr) {
> > 	__asm__ __volatile__(LWSYNC_ON_SMP ::: "memory");
> > 	__clear_bit(nr, addr);
> > }
> >
> > which was added by Nick's powerpc-lock-bitops.patch.  I am suspecting that
> > this isn't pp32 code?
> 
> Hmm, when LWSYNC_ON_SMP is a noop, it seems like it should probably
> be an empty string instead of nothing? ("") That should make behaviour
> more consistent I think.

The wormhole is arch/ppc's hack to get to include/asm-powerpc...

As for having LWSYNC_ON_SMP be "" ... that might be the best way but I'd
rather not take chances right now and go for the quick fix of making
__clear_bit_unlock() do

	LWSYNC_ON_SMP ""

instead.

Ben.



  reply	other threads:[~2007-09-08 16:40 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2007-09-06 18:40 2.6.23-rc4-mm1 compile error for ppc 32 Mathieu Desnoyers
2007-09-06 23:00 ` Andrew Morton
2007-09-08  1:36   ` Nick Piggin
2007-09-08 16:42     ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt [this message]
2007-09-13 22:17       ` Andrew Morton
2007-09-15 13:32         ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2007-09-15 15:00           ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2007-09-17 20:31             ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2007-09-17 20:44               ` Balbir Singh

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1189269730.5972.163.camel@localhost.localdomain \
    --to=benh@kernel.crashing.org \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mathieu.desnoyers@polymtl.ca \
    --cc=nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.