From: Lee Schermerhorn <Lee.Schermerhorn@hp.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Yasunori Goto <y-goto@jp.fujitsu.com>,
Andy Whitcroft <apw@shadowen.org>,
Paul Mundt <lethal@linux-sh.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH -mm] mm: Fix memory hotplug + sparsemem build.
Date: Fri, 14 Sep 2007 10:09:27 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1189778967.5315.11.camel@localhost> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20070913194130.1611fd78.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
On Thu, 2007-09-13 at 19:41 -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Fri, 14 Sep 2007 11:02:43 +0900 Yasunori Goto <y-goto@jp.fujitsu.com> wrote:
>
> > > > /* call arch's memory hotadd */
> > > >
> > >
> > > OK, we're getting into a mess here. This patch fixes
> > > update-n_high_memory-node-state-for-memory-hotadd.patch, but which patch
> > > does update-n_high_memory-node-state-for-memory-hotadd.patch fix?
> > >
> > > At present I just whacked
> > > update-n_high_memory-node-state-for-memory-hotadd.patch at the end of
> > > everything, but that was lazy of me and it ends up making a mess.
> >
> > It is enough. No more patch is necessary for these issues.
> > I already fixed about Andy-san's comment. :-)
>
> Now I'm more confused. I have two separeate questions:
>
> a) Is the justr-added update-n_high_memory-node-state-for-memory-hotadd-fix.patch
> still needed?
>
> b) Which patch in 2.6.22-rc4-mm1 does
> update-n_high_memory-node-state-for-memory-hotadd.patch fix? In other
> words, into which patch should I fold
> update-n_high_memory-node-state-for-memory-hotadd.patch prior to sending
> to Linus?
Andrew:
I originally sent in the "update-n_high_memory..." patch against
23-rc3-mm1 on 27aug to fix a problem that I introduced when I moved the
populating of N_HIGH_MEMORY state to free_area_init_nodes(). This would
miss setting the "has memory" node state for hot added memory. I never
saw any response, but then it ended up in 23-rc4-mm1.
This Tuesday, Paul Mundt sent in a patch to fix a build problem with
MEMORY_HOTPLUG_SPARSE introduced by my patch. He replaced zone->node
with zone_to_nid(zone) in the node_set_state() arguments.
The latest patch, from Yasunori-san, I believe, starts kswapd for nodes
to which memory has been hot-added. As I understand it, his is needed
because the memoryless nodes patch results in no kswapd for memoryless
nodes.
Does that help?
Lee
>
> (I (usually) get to work this out for myself. Sometimes it is painful).
>
> Generally, if people tell me which patch-in-mm their patch is fixing,
> it really helps. Adrian does this all the time.
>
> Thanks.
>
> --
> To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
> the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
> see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
> Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Lee Schermerhorn <Lee.Schermerhorn@hp.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Yasunori Goto <y-goto@jp.fujitsu.com>,
Andy Whitcroft <apw@shadowen.org>,
Paul Mundt <lethal@linux-sh.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH -mm] mm: Fix memory hotplug + sparsemem build.
Date: Fri, 14 Sep 2007 10:09:27 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1189778967.5315.11.camel@localhost> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20070913194130.1611fd78.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
On Thu, 2007-09-13 at 19:41 -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Fri, 14 Sep 2007 11:02:43 +0900 Yasunori Goto <y-goto@jp.fujitsu.com> wrote:
>
> > > > /* call arch's memory hotadd */
> > > >
> > >
> > > OK, we're getting into a mess here. This patch fixes
> > > update-n_high_memory-node-state-for-memory-hotadd.patch, but which patch
> > > does update-n_high_memory-node-state-for-memory-hotadd.patch fix?
> > >
> > > At present I just whacked
> > > update-n_high_memory-node-state-for-memory-hotadd.patch at the end of
> > > everything, but that was lazy of me and it ends up making a mess.
> >
> > It is enough. No more patch is necessary for these issues.
> > I already fixed about Andy-san's comment. :-)
>
> Now I'm more confused. I have two separeate questions:
>
> a) Is the justr-added update-n_high_memory-node-state-for-memory-hotadd-fix.patch
> still needed?
>
> b) Which patch in 2.6.22-rc4-mm1 does
> update-n_high_memory-node-state-for-memory-hotadd.patch fix? In other
> words, into which patch should I fold
> update-n_high_memory-node-state-for-memory-hotadd.patch prior to sending
> to Linus?
Andrew:
I originally sent in the "update-n_high_memory..." patch against
23-rc3-mm1 on 27aug to fix a problem that I introduced when I moved the
populating of N_HIGH_MEMORY state to free_area_init_nodes(). This would
miss setting the "has memory" node state for hot added memory. I never
saw any response, but then it ended up in 23-rc4-mm1.
This Tuesday, Paul Mundt sent in a patch to fix a build problem with
MEMORY_HOTPLUG_SPARSE introduced by my patch. He replaced zone->node
with zone_to_nid(zone) in the node_set_state() arguments.
The latest patch, from Yasunori-san, I believe, starts kswapd for nodes
to which memory has been hot-added. As I understand it, his is needed
because the memoryless nodes patch results in no kswapd for memoryless
nodes.
Does that help?
Lee
>
> (I (usually) get to work this out for myself. Sometimes it is painful).
>
> Generally, if people tell me which patch-in-mm their patch is fixing,
> it really helps. Adrian does this all the time.
>
> Thanks.
>
> --
> To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
> the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
> see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
> Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-09-14 14:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-09-11 7:25 [PATCH -mm] mm: Fix memory hotplug + sparsemem build Paul Mundt
2007-09-11 7:25 ` Paul Mundt
2007-09-11 8:18 ` Yasunori Goto
2007-09-11 8:18 ` Yasunori Goto
2007-09-11 8:25 ` Paul Mundt
2007-09-11 8:25 ` Paul Mundt
2007-09-11 9:15 ` Andy Whitcroft
2007-09-11 9:15 ` Andy Whitcroft
2007-09-11 9:37 ` Yasunori Goto
2007-09-11 9:37 ` Yasunori Goto
2007-09-14 1:44 ` Andrew Morton
2007-09-14 1:44 ` Andrew Morton
2007-09-14 2:02 ` Yasunori Goto
2007-09-14 2:02 ` Yasunori Goto
2007-09-14 2:41 ` Andrew Morton
2007-09-14 2:41 ` Andrew Morton
2007-09-14 5:14 ` Yasunori Goto
2007-09-14 5:14 ` Yasunori Goto
2007-09-14 14:09 ` Lee Schermerhorn [this message]
2007-09-14 14:09 ` Lee Schermerhorn
2007-09-14 20:51 ` Andrew Morton
2007-09-14 20:51 ` Andrew Morton
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1189778967.5315.11.camel@localhost \
--to=lee.schermerhorn@hp.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=apw@shadowen.org \
--cc=lethal@linux-sh.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=y-goto@jp.fujitsu.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.