* Does latest xen-unstable build failed?
@ 2007-09-26 15:53 You, Yongkang
2007-09-26 16:02 ` Ian Campbell
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: You, Yongkang @ 2007-09-26 15:53 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Keir Fraser; +Cc: xen-devel
Hi Keir,
I got build failure in both IA32 and IA32e platform. The changeset is
#15961
The failure log is like:
cp build-linux-2.6.18-xen_x86_64/arch/x86_64/boot/vmlinuz
/home/nightly/builds_xen_unstable/xen-3.0-hg-xen_unstable-15961-20070926
/dist/install/boot/vmlinuz-2.6.18-xen
cp: cannot stat
`build-linux-2.6.18-xen_x86_64/arch/x86_64/boot/vmlinuz': No such file
or directory
make[2]: *** [build] Error 1
make[2]: Leaving directory
`/home/nightly/builds_xen_unstable/xen-3.0-hg-xen_unstable-15961-2007092
6'
make[1]: *** [linux-2.6-xen-install] Error 2
Best Regards,
Yongkang You
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: Does latest xen-unstable build failed?
2007-09-26 15:53 Does latest xen-unstable build failed? You, Yongkang
@ 2007-09-26 16:02 ` Ian Campbell
2007-09-26 16:09 ` You, Yongkang
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Ian Campbell @ 2007-09-26 16:02 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: You, Yongkang; +Cc: xen-devel, Keir Fraser
On Wed, 2007-09-26 at 23:53 +0800, You, Yongkang wrote:
> Hi Keir,
>
> I got build failure in both IA32 and IA32e platform. The changeset is
> #15961
> The failure log is like:
>
> cp build-linux-2.6.18-xen_x86_64/arch/x86_64/boot/vmlinuz
> /home/nightly/builds_xen_unstable/xen-3.0-hg-xen_unstable-15961-20070926
> /dist/install/boot/vmlinuz-2.6.18-xen
> cp: cannot stat
> `build-linux-2.6.18-xen_x86_64/arch/x86_64/boot/vmlinuz': No such file
> or directory
> make[2]: *** [build] Error 1
> make[2]: Leaving directory
> `/home/nightly/builds_xen_unstable/xen-3.0-hg-xen_unstable-15961-2007092
> 6'
> make[1]: *** [linux-2.6-xen-install] Error 2
>
I think you need to update your linux-2.6.18-xen.hg subtree. This is not
done automatically to avoid blowing away developer changes but you can
add XEN_LINUX_UPDATE=y to your make command line, or just do the pull
manually.
The actual reason behind the failure is that xen-unstable.hg
15909:202153d094d8 and linux-2.6.18-xen.hg 211:c1f5d027adf7 are mutually
dependant.
Ian.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* RE: Does latest xen-unstable build failed?
2007-09-26 16:02 ` Ian Campbell
@ 2007-09-26 16:09 ` You, Yongkang
2007-09-26 16:14 ` Ian Campbell
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: You, Yongkang @ 2007-09-26 16:09 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Ian Campbell; +Cc: xen-devel, Keir Fraser
Hi Ian,
Thanks for the reply.
I do manually pull linux-2.6.18-xen.hg tree. But it is already the
latest one for xen-unstable.
http://xenbits.xensource.com/linux-2.6.18-xen.hg
hg tip
changeset: 208:d2bd9af846b5
tag: tip
user: Christian Limpach <Christian.Limpach@xensource.com>
date: Tue Sep 11 16:38:13 2007 +0100
summary: Add the CDROM_GET_CAPABILITY ioctl to blkfront.
Maybe forget to pull from staging tree?
Best Regards,
Yongkang You
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Ian Campbell [mailto:Ian.Campbell@XenSource.com]
>Sent: Thursday, September 27, 2007 12:02 AM
>To: You, Yongkang
>Cc: Keir Fraser; xen-devel
>Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] Does latest xen-unstable build failed?
>
>On Wed, 2007-09-26 at 23:53 +0800, You, Yongkang wrote:
>> Hi Keir,
>>
>> I got build failure in both IA32 and IA32e platform. The changeset is
>> #15961
>> The failure log is like:
>>
>> cp build-linux-2.6.18-xen_x86_64/arch/x86_64/boot/vmlinuz
>>
>/home/nightly/builds_xen_unstable/xen-3.0-hg-xen_unstable-15961
>-20070926
>> /dist/install/boot/vmlinuz-2.6.18-xen
>> cp: cannot stat
>> `build-linux-2.6.18-xen_x86_64/arch/x86_64/boot/vmlinuz': No
>such file
>> or directory
>> make[2]: *** [build] Error 1
>> make[2]: Leaving directory
>>
>`/home/nightly/builds_xen_unstable/xen-3.0-hg-xen_unstable-1596
>1-2007092
>> 6'
>> make[1]: *** [linux-2.6-xen-install] Error 2
>>
>
>I think you need to update your linux-2.6.18-xen.hg subtree.
>This is not
>done automatically to avoid blowing away developer changes but you can
>add XEN_LINUX_UPDATE=y to your make command line, or just do the pull
>manually.
>
>The actual reason behind the failure is that xen-unstable.hg
>15909:202153d094d8 and linux-2.6.18-xen.hg 211:c1f5d027adf7
>are mutually
>dependant.
>
>Ian.
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* RE: Does latest xen-unstable build failed?
2007-09-26 16:09 ` You, Yongkang
@ 2007-09-26 16:14 ` Ian Campbell
0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Ian Campbell @ 2007-09-26 16:14 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: You, Yongkang; +Cc: xen-devel, Keir Fraser
On Thu, 2007-09-27 at 00:09 +0800, You, Yongkang wrote:
> Hi Ian,
>
> Thanks for the reply.
> I do manually pull linux-2.6.18-xen.hg tree. But it is already the
> latest one for xen-unstable.
> http://xenbits.xensource.com/linux-2.6.18-xen.hg
>
> hg tip
> changeset: 208:d2bd9af846b5
> tag: tip
> user: Christian Limpach <Christian.Limpach@xensource.com>
> date: Tue Sep 11 16:38:13 2007 +0100
> summary: Add the CDROM_GET_CAPABILITY ioctl to blkfront.
>
> Maybe forget to pull from staging tree?
Yes, it looks like the xen-unstable staging tree has been flowing
through but the linux-2.6.18-xen one hasn't. I think the automated
systems do this right so I suspect that someone manually pushed through
xen-unstable and forgot the Linux tree.
I'd pull from the Linux staging tree for now if I were you, regression
tests should pass quite soon at which point both staging trees should
sync out to the main ones.
Ian.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2007-09-26 16:14 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2007-09-26 15:53 Does latest xen-unstable build failed? You, Yongkang
2007-09-26 16:02 ` Ian Campbell
2007-09-26 16:09 ` You, Yongkang
2007-09-26 16:14 ` Ian Campbell
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.