From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
To: Gerhard Pircher <gerhard_pircher@gmx.net>
Cc: linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org
Subject: Re: Problem with OF interrupt parsing code
Date: Tue, 02 Oct 2007 07:36:32 +1000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1191274592.6310.13.camel@pasglop> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20071001210025.314240@gmx.net>
On Mon, 2007-10-01 at 23:00 +0200, Gerhard Pircher wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I think I found an issue in the OF interrupt parsing code, although I
> have to admit that my device tree source doesn't really follow the
> specification.
>
> First some information about my target setup. I didn't specify an
> interrupt-map and interrupt-map-mask property in the pci node, because
> AFAIK there are three different AmigaOne models with different IRQ
> routing. Secondly the AmigaOne is a desktop system with 4 PCI/AGP slots,
> thus I can't specify device nodes for all possible devices. By looking at
> pci_read_irq_line() in pci_common.c it should be possible for the kernel
> to fall back to the interrupt settings in the PCI config space of every
> device.
That's deprecated and only support for legacy stuff that predates the
current device-tree support & old/crappy firmware.
You should be able to generate the appropriate interrupt-map from your
loader or wrapper to provide the routing for your slots. It should be
easy enough to have 3 static arrays in your wrapper and use the right
one to "set" the property value.
> Unfortunately I couldn't capture the kernel log, because the serial
> console is not yet working, so here comes a description of what I think
> is going on.
> Well, pci_read_irq_line() starts with PCI device 00:00.0 (PCI host bridge)
> and invokes of_irq_map_pci() in prom_parse.c. It find the predefined
> device node in the device tree. Since of_irq_map_one() can't find an
> interrupt property in the device node, it returns to pci_read_irq_line()
> and setups the interrupt mapping based on the settings in the PCI config
> space. So far so good.
> The problem occurs now, if there is no device node defined for another
> PCI device. In this case, of_irq_map_pci() checks for an interrupt pin,
> searches again for the host bridge node and calls of_irq_map_raw() with
> the device node of the host bridge. The function finds the
> #interrupt-cells, #address-cells, interrupt-controller properties, but
> fails to find the interrupt-map property (because it's missing in the
> device tree). Therefore the function then tries to find a new parent,
> which leads to an endless loop (it always selects the PCI2ISA southbridge
> in the device tree).
>
> Can somebody confirm my explanation? It would help, if the kernel could
> fall back to the PCI settings in this case, too.
I'm not sure what you are trying to explain above... It looks like your
tree layout is somewhat broken though I think I see how...
One option would be to make the PCI specific IRQ parsing stop & fail if
the host bridge doesn't provide a map instead of following up an
interrupt-parent link (which is I think what you have in there).
But I don't like that. Just fixup your maps properly and everything
should work just fine.
Ben.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-10-01 21:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-10-01 21:00 Problem with OF interrupt parsing code Gerhard Pircher
2007-10-01 21:11 ` Gerhard Pircher
2007-10-01 21:39 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2007-10-01 22:33 ` Segher Boessenkool
2007-10-01 22:54 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2007-10-01 22:55 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2007-10-01 23:36 ` Segher Boessenkool
2007-10-02 12:38 ` Gerhard Pircher
2007-10-02 22:03 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2007-10-03 7:43 ` Gerhard Pircher
2007-10-01 21:26 ` Scott Wood
2007-10-01 21:37 ` Scott Wood
2007-10-01 21:43 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2007-10-01 21:48 ` Scott Wood
2007-10-01 22:07 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2007-10-02 12:46 ` Gerhard Pircher
2007-10-01 21:36 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2007-10-02 12:40 Gerhard Pircher
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1191274592.6310.13.camel@pasglop \
--to=benh@kernel.crashing.org \
--cc=gerhard_pircher@gmx.net \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.