From: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
To: "BERTRAND Joël" <joel.bertrand@systella.fr>
Cc: Bill Davidsen <davidsen@tmr.com>,
linux-raid@vger.kernel.org, sparclinux@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [BUG] Raid5 trouble
Date: Fri, 19 Oct 2007 08:51:43 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1192809103.30976.11.camel@dwillia2-linux.ch.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <471864F8.9010209@systella.fr>
On Fri, 2007-10-19 at 01:04 -0700, BERTRAND Joël wrote:
> I never see any oops with this patch. But I cannot create a
> RAID1 array
> with a local RAID5 volume and a foreign RAID5 array exported by iSCSI.
> iSCSI seems to works fine, but RAID1 creation randomly aborts due to a
> unknown SCSI task on target side.
For now I am going to forward this patch to Neil for inclusion in
-stable and 2.6.24-rc. I will add a "Tested-by: Joël Bertrand
<joel.bertrand@systella.fr>" unless you have an objection.
> I have stressed iSCSI target with some simultaneous I/O
> without any
> trouble (nullio, fileio and blockio), thus I suspect another bug in
> raid
> code (or an arch specific bug). The last two days, I have made some
> tests to isolate and reproduce this bug:
> 1/ iSCSI target and initiator seem work when I export with iSCSI a
> raid5
> array;
> 2/ raid1 and raid5 seem work with local disks;
> 3/ iSCSI target is disconnected only when I create a raid1 volume over
> iSCSI (blockio _and_ fileio) with following message:
>
> Oct 18 10:43:52 poulenc kernel: iscsi_trgt: cmnd_abort(1156) 29 1 0 42
> 57344 0 0
> Oct 18 10:43:52 poulenc kernel: iscsi_trgt: Abort Task (01) issued on
> tid:1 lun:0 by sid:630024457682948 (Unknown Task)
>
> I run for 12 hours some dd's (read and write in nullio)
> between
> initiator and target without any disconnection. Thus iSCSI code seems
> to
> be robust. Both initiator and target are alone on a single gigabit
> ethernet link (without any switch). I'm investigating...
Can you reproduce on 2.6.22?
Also, I do not think this is the cause of your failure, but you have
CONFIG_DMA_ENGINE=y in your config. Setting this to 'n' will compile
out the unneeded checks for offload engines in async_memcpy and
async_xor.
>
> Regards,
> JKB
Regards,
Dan
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
To: "BERTRAND Joël" <joel.bertrand@systella.fr>
Cc: Bill Davidsen <davidsen@tmr.com>,
linux-raid@vger.kernel.org, sparclinux@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [BUG] Raid5 trouble
Date: Fri, 19 Oct 2007 15:51:43 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1192809103.30976.11.camel@dwillia2-linux.ch.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <471864F8.9010209@systella.fr>
On Fri, 2007-10-19 at 01:04 -0700, BERTRAND Joël wrote:
> I never see any oops with this patch. But I cannot create a
> RAID1 array
> with a local RAID5 volume and a foreign RAID5 array exported by iSCSI.
> iSCSI seems to works fine, but RAID1 creation randomly aborts due to a
> unknown SCSI task on target side.
For now I am going to forward this patch to Neil for inclusion in
-stable and 2.6.24-rc. I will add a "Tested-by: Joël Bertrand
<joel.bertrand@systella.fr>" unless you have an objection.
> I have stressed iSCSI target with some simultaneous I/O
> without any
> trouble (nullio, fileio and blockio), thus I suspect another bug in
> raid
> code (or an arch specific bug). The last two days, I have made some
> tests to isolate and reproduce this bug:
> 1/ iSCSI target and initiator seem work when I export with iSCSI a
> raid5
> array;
> 2/ raid1 and raid5 seem work with local disks;
> 3/ iSCSI target is disconnected only when I create a raid1 volume over
> iSCSI (blockio _and_ fileio) with following message:
>
> Oct 18 10:43:52 poulenc kernel: iscsi_trgt: cmnd_abort(1156) 29 1 0 42
> 57344 0 0
> Oct 18 10:43:52 poulenc kernel: iscsi_trgt: Abort Task (01) issued on
> tid:1 lun:0 by sid:630024457682948 (Unknown Task)
>
> I run for 12 hours some dd's (read and write in nullio)
> between
> initiator and target without any disconnection. Thus iSCSI code seems
> to
> be robust. Both initiator and target are alone on a single gigabit
> ethernet link (without any switch). I'm investigating...
Can you reproduce on 2.6.22?
Also, I do not think this is the cause of your failure, but you have
CONFIG_DMA_ENGINE=y in your config. Setting this to 'n' will compile
out the unneeded checks for offload engines in async_memcpy and
async_xor.
>
> Regards,
> JKB
Regards,
Dan
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-10-19 15:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 72+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-10-16 13:24 [BUG] Raid5 trouble BERTRAND Joël
2007-10-16 13:24 ` BERTRAND Joël
2007-10-17 14:32 ` BERTRAND Joël
2007-10-17 14:32 ` BERTRAND Joël
2007-10-17 14:58 ` Dan Williams
2007-10-17 14:58 ` Dan Williams
2007-10-17 15:40 ` Dan Williams
2007-10-17 15:40 ` Dan Williams
2007-10-17 16:44 ` BERTRAND Joël
2007-10-17 16:44 ` BERTRAND Joël
2007-10-18 0:46 ` Dan Williams
2007-10-18 0:46 ` Dan Williams
2007-10-18 8:29 ` BERTRAND Joël
2007-10-18 8:29 ` BERTRAND Joël
2007-10-19 2:55 ` Bill Davidsen
2007-10-19 2:55 ` Bill Davidsen
2007-10-19 8:04 ` BERTRAND Joël
2007-10-19 8:04 ` BERTRAND Joël
2007-10-19 15:51 ` Dan Williams [this message]
2007-10-19 15:51 ` Dan Williams
2007-10-19 16:03 ` BERTRAND Joël
2007-10-19 16:03 ` BERTRAND Joël
[not found] ` <4718DE66.8000905@tmr.com>
2007-10-19 20:42 ` BERTRAND Joël
2007-10-19 20:42 ` BERTRAND Joël
2007-10-19 20:49 ` [BUG] Raid1/5 over iSCSI trouble BERTRAND Joël
2007-10-19 20:49 ` BERTRAND Joël
2007-10-19 21:02 ` [Iscsitarget-devel] " Ross S. W. Walker
2007-10-19 21:02 ` Ross S. W. Walker
2007-10-19 21:06 ` BERTRAND Joël
2007-10-19 21:06 ` [Iscsitarget-devel] " BERTRAND Joël
2007-10-19 21:10 ` Ross S. W. Walker
2007-10-19 21:10 ` [Iscsitarget-devel] " Ross S. W. Walker
2007-10-20 7:45 ` BERTRAND Joël
2007-10-20 7:45 ` [Iscsitarget-devel] " BERTRAND Joël
2007-10-19 21:11 ` Scott Kaelin
2007-10-19 21:11 ` Scott Kaelin
2007-10-19 21:04 ` BERTRAND Joël
2007-10-19 21:04 ` BERTRAND Joël
2007-10-19 21:08 ` Ross S. W. Walker
2007-10-19 21:08 ` [Iscsitarget-devel] " Ross S. W. Walker
2007-10-19 21:12 ` Dan Williams
2007-10-19 21:12 ` Dan Williams
2007-10-20 8:05 ` BERTRAND Joël
2007-10-20 8:05 ` BERTRAND Joël
2007-10-24 7:12 ` BERTRAND Joël
2007-10-24 7:12 ` BERTRAND Joël
2007-10-24 20:10 ` Bill Davidsen
2007-10-24 20:10 ` Bill Davidsen
2007-10-24 23:49 ` Dan Williams
2007-10-24 23:49 ` Dan Williams
2007-10-25 0:03 ` David Miller
2007-10-25 0:03 ` David Miller
2007-10-27 13:29 ` BERTRAND Joël
2007-10-27 13:29 ` BERTRAND Joël
2007-10-27 18:27 ` Dan Williams
2007-10-27 18:27 ` Dan Williams
2007-10-27 19:35 ` BERTRAND Joël
2007-10-27 19:35 ` BERTRAND Joël
2007-10-27 21:13 ` Ming Zhang
2007-10-27 21:13 ` Ming Zhang
2007-10-29 10:40 ` BERTRAND Joël
2007-10-29 10:40 ` BERTRAND Joël
2007-10-19 21:19 ` Ming Zhang
2007-10-19 21:19 ` [Iscsitarget-devel] " Ming Zhang
2007-10-19 23:50 ` Bill Davidsen
2007-10-19 23:50 ` Bill Davidsen
2007-10-19 23:58 ` Bill Davidsen
2007-10-19 23:58 ` Bill Davidsen
2007-10-20 7:52 ` BERTRAND Joël
2007-10-20 7:52 ` BERTRAND Joël
2007-10-17 16:07 ` [BUG] Raid5 trouble BERTRAND Joël
2007-10-17 16:07 ` BERTRAND Joël
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1192809103.30976.11.camel@dwillia2-linux.ch.intel.com \
--to=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
--cc=davidsen@tmr.com \
--cc=joel.bertrand@systella.fr \
--cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sparclinux@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.