From: Jerone Young <jyoung5@us.ibm.com>
To: Hollis Blanchard <hollisb-r/Jw6+rmf7HQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
Cc: kvm-devel-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org,
kvm-ppc-devel-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org
Subject: Re: [kvm-ppc-devel] [PATCH] Add powerpc dcr callbacks to
Date: Wed, 02 Jan 2008 20:54:02 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1199307243.21895.2.camel@thinkpad> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1199306854.15953.16.camel@basalt>
That would be my sketchy idea. Though I was going to wait and see what
the feedback would be doing this :-) It can go either way. Since it's
just callbacks it really doesn't matter. But it does affect the
structure size never the less.
So what are everyone thoughs about arch specific callbacks ?
On Wed, 2008-01-02 at 14:47 -0600, Hollis Blanchard wrote:
> What is the plan here, to ifdef the arch-specific callbacks? If so,
> 'tpr_access' is an obvious candidate...
>
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005.
http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/
_______________________________________________
kvm-ppc-devel mailing list
kvm-ppc-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/kvm-ppc-devel
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Jerone Young <jyoung5-r/Jw6+rmf7HQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
To: Hollis Blanchard <hollisb-r/Jw6+rmf7HQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
Cc: kvm-devel-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org,
kvm-ppc-devel-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org
Subject: Re: [kvm-ppc-devel] [PATCH] Add powerpc dcr callbacks to kvm callback structrure
Date: Wed, 02 Jan 2008 14:54:02 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1199307243.21895.2.camel@thinkpad> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1199306854.15953.16.camel@basalt>
That would be my sketchy idea. Though I was going to wait and see what
the feedback would be doing this :-) It can go either way. Since it's
just callbacks it really doesn't matter. But it does affect the
structure size never the less.
So what are everyone thoughs about arch specific callbacks ?
On Wed, 2008-01-02 at 14:47 -0600, Hollis Blanchard wrote:
> What is the plan here, to ifdef the arch-specific callbacks? If so,
> 'tpr_access' is an obvious candidate...
>
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005.
http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-01-02 20:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-01-02 20:29 [kvm-ppc-devel] [PATCH] Add powerpc dcr callbacks to kvm callback Jerone Young
2008-01-02 20:29 ` [PATCH] Add powerpc dcr callbacks to kvm callback structrure Jerone Young
2008-01-02 20:47 ` [kvm-ppc-devel] [PATCH] Add powerpc dcr callbacks to Hollis Blanchard
2008-01-02 20:47 ` [kvm-ppc-devel] [PATCH] Add powerpc dcr callbacks to kvm callback structrure Hollis Blanchard
2008-01-02 20:54 ` Jerone Young [this message]
2008-01-02 20:54 ` Jerone Young
2008-01-03 15:47 ` [kvm-ppc-devel] [kvm-devel] [PATCH] Add powerpc dcr callbacks Avi Kivity
2008-01-03 15:47 ` [kvm-ppc-devel] [PATCH] Add powerpc dcr callbacks to kvm callback structrure Avi Kivity
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1199307243.21895.2.camel@thinkpad \
--to=jyoung5@us.ibm.com \
--cc=hollisb-r/Jw6+rmf7HQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=kvm-devel-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org \
--cc=kvm-ppc-devel-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.