All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* SLES installation on dual controller subsystem
@ 2008-02-04 23:58 Pradipmaya Maharana
  2008-02-05  2:07 ` malahal
  2008-02-05  2:10 ` Chandra Seetharaman
  0 siblings, 2 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Pradipmaya Maharana @ 2008-02-04 23:58 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: device-mapper development

Hi All,

I am trying to install SLES 10.1 on my dual controller subsystem. The
subsystem is ALUA aware and hence shows me 2 LUNs for one while trying
to install SLES on it.

If my LUN's preferred controller is 1 then everything goes fine, but
if the preferred controller of the LUN I am installing OS on is 2,
then installation goes fine but the boot fails.

It throws some errors like root (hd1,1) could not found. When I modify
this to too(hd0,1) it boots fine.

What am I missing here?

Regards,
Pradipmaya.

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

* Re: SLES installation on dual controller subsystem
  2008-02-04 23:58 SLES installation on dual controller subsystem Pradipmaya Maharana
@ 2008-02-05  2:07 ` malahal
  2008-02-05  2:10 ` Chandra Seetharaman
  1 sibling, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: malahal @ 2008-02-05  2:07 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: dm-devel

Pradipmaya Maharana [pradipmaya@gmail.com] wrote:
> Hi All,
> 
> I am trying to install SLES 10.1 on my dual controller subsystem. The
> subsystem is ALUA aware and hence shows me 2 LUNs for one while trying
> to install SLES on it.
> 
> If my LUN's preferred controller is 1 then everything goes fine, but
> if the preferred controller of the LUN I am installing OS on is 2,
> then installation goes fine but the boot fails.
> 
> It throws some errors like root (hd1,1) could not found. When I modify
> this to too(hd0,1) it boots fine.

Looks like a GRUB issue to me. Go into grub's interactive/editing mode
while booting and try "root (hd<TAB>), it will tell you what partitions
it sees. My guess is that GRUB can't find your other path and that is
why it can't see (hd1,1). (hd0,1) works because it saw that path.

If that is indeed right, it is a BIOS feature/problem.

-Malahal.

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

* Re: SLES installation on dual controller subsystem
  2008-02-04 23:58 SLES installation on dual controller subsystem Pradipmaya Maharana
  2008-02-05  2:07 ` malahal
@ 2008-02-05  2:10 ` Chandra Seetharaman
  2008-02-05  5:46   ` Pradipmaya Maharana
  1 sibling, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Chandra Seetharaman @ 2008-02-05  2:10 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: device-mapper development

On Mon, 2008-02-04 at 15:58 -0800, Pradipmaya Maharana wrote:
> Hi All,
> 
> I am trying to install SLES 10.1 on my dual controller subsystem. The
> subsystem is ALUA aware and hence shows me 2 LUNs for one while trying
> to install SLES on it.
> 
> If my LUN's preferred controller is 1 then everything goes fine, but
> if the preferred controller of the LUN I am installing OS on is 2,
> then installation goes fine but the boot fails.
> 
> It throws some errors like root (hd1,1) could not found. When I modify
> this to too(hd0,1) it boots fine.
> 
> What am I missing here?

From what you explain, looks like the kernel doesn't boot at all. You
are getting error from your BIOS/firmware.

Your BIOS/firmware may not be multipath aware.
 
> 
> Regards,
> Pradipmaya.
> 
> --
> dm-devel mailing list
> dm-devel@redhat.com
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/dm-devel
-- 

----------------------------------------------------------------------
    Chandra Seetharaman               | Be careful what you choose....
              - sekharan@us.ibm.com   |      .......you may get it.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

* Re: SLES installation on dual controller subsystem
  2008-02-05  2:10 ` Chandra Seetharaman
@ 2008-02-05  5:46   ` Pradipmaya Maharana
  2008-02-05 23:13     ` malahal
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Pradipmaya Maharana @ 2008-02-05  5:46 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: sekharan, device-mapper development

Thanks for your response.
RHEL works fine in same scenario; any explanation why? I mean what
does RHEL do different here?

Thanks and Regards,
Pradipmaya.


On Feb 4, 2008 6:10 PM, Chandra Seetharaman <sekharan@us.ibm.com> wrote:
>
> On Mon, 2008-02-04 at 15:58 -0800, Pradipmaya Maharana wrote:
> > Hi All,
> >
> > I am trying to install SLES 10.1 on my dual controller subsystem. The
> > subsystem is ALUA aware and hence shows me 2 LUNs for one while trying
> > to install SLES on it.
> >
> > If my LUN's preferred controller is 1 then everything goes fine, but
> > if the preferred controller of the LUN I am installing OS on is 2,
> > then installation goes fine but the boot fails.
> >
> > It throws some errors like root (hd1,1) could not found. When I modify
> > this to too(hd0,1) it boots fine.
> >
> > What am I missing here?
>
> >From what you explain, looks like the kernel doesn't boot at all. You
> are getting error from your BIOS/firmware.
>
> Your BIOS/firmware may not be multipath aware.
>
> >
> > Regards,
> > Pradipmaya.
> >
> > --
> > dm-devel mailing list
> > dm-devel@redhat.com
> > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/dm-devel
> --
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>    Chandra Seetharaman               | Be careful what you choose....
>              - sekharan@us.ibm.com   |      .......you may get it.
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>
>
> --
> dm-devel mailing list
> dm-devel@redhat.com
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/dm-devel
>

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

* Re: SLES installation on dual controller subsystem
  2008-02-05  5:46   ` Pradipmaya Maharana
@ 2008-02-05 23:13     ` malahal
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: malahal @ 2008-02-05 23:13 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: dm-devel

Pradipmaya Maharana [pradipmaya@gmail.com] wrote:
> Thanks for your response.
> RHEL works fine in same scenario; any explanation why? I mean what
> does RHEL do different here?

What does RHEL set its root? "root (hd0,1)" or "root (hd1,1)"?

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2008-02-05 23:13 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2008-02-04 23:58 SLES installation on dual controller subsystem Pradipmaya Maharana
2008-02-05  2:07 ` malahal
2008-02-05  2:10 ` Chandra Seetharaman
2008-02-05  5:46   ` Pradipmaya Maharana
2008-02-05 23:13     ` malahal

This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.