From: Harvey Harrison <harvey.harrison@gmail.com>
To: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>, Sam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org>,
Adrian Bunk <bunk@kernel.org>,
Alexey Starikovskiy <aystarik@gmail.com>,
lenb@kernel.org, astarikovskiy@suse.de,
linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Arjan van de Ven <arjan@infradead.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Subject: Re: [patch] x86: phase out forced inlining
Date: Tue, 04 Mar 2008 10:14:13 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1204654453.5698.17.camel@brick> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <47CD9060.9000708@zytor.com>
On Tue, 2008-03-04 at 10:09 -0800, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> Harvey Harrison wrote:
> >
> >> __inline__ : 1380
> >
> > Lots of them in include/asm-*...not sure if there is a reason for this.
> >
>
> Preferred form for code that's exported to userspace (since gcc
> complains with -ansi -pedantic otherwise.)
>
Figured it would be something like that. Would it be reasonable to move
towards eliminating __inline?
Also, since the exported headers already go through unifdef, could we
move to using inline everywhere in the kernel and add a processing step
to make it __inline__ in the exported headers?
Harvey
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-03-04 18:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 42+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-03-01 16:19 [2.6 patch] acpi/battery.c: make 2 functions static Adrian Bunk
2008-03-01 18:26 ` Alexey Starikovskiy
2008-03-01 18:35 ` Adrian Bunk
2008-03-01 18:42 ` Alexey Starikovskiy
2008-03-01 18:45 ` Adrian Bunk
2008-03-03 8:57 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-03-03 9:13 ` Adrian Bunk
2008-03-03 9:17 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-03-03 9:31 ` Sam Ravnborg
2008-03-03 9:48 ` Adrian Bunk
2008-03-03 10:39 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-03-03 11:34 ` Adrian Bunk
2008-03-03 11:45 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-03-03 12:02 ` Adrian Bunk
2008-03-03 12:10 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-03-03 12:29 ` Adrian Bunk
2008-03-03 12:50 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-03-03 14:54 ` Adrian Bunk
2008-03-03 15:01 ` Adrian Bunk
2008-03-04 13:16 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-03-04 13:47 ` Adrian Bunk
2008-03-04 14:22 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-03-04 14:36 ` Jörn Engel
2008-03-04 14:36 ` Jörn Engel
2008-03-04 14:45 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-03-04 14:45 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-03-03 12:13 ` [patch] x86: phase out forced inlining Ingo Molnar
2008-03-03 14:56 ` Sam Ravnborg
2008-03-04 16:46 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-03-04 18:07 ` Harvey Harrison
2008-03-04 18:09 ` H. Peter Anvin
2008-03-04 18:14 ` Harvey Harrison [this message]
2008-03-04 18:18 ` Harvey Harrison
2008-03-03 15:01 ` Arjan van de Ven
2008-03-03 15:58 ` Harvey Harrison
2008-03-04 6:42 ` Andrew Morton
2008-03-04 7:32 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-03-04 8:00 ` Andrew Morton
2008-03-04 9:50 ` Andi Kleen
2008-03-04 8:03 ` Sam Ravnborg
2008-03-04 8:38 ` Andrew Morton
2008-03-03 9:45 ` [2.6 patch] acpi/battery.c: make 2 functions static Adrian Bunk
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1204654453.5698.17.camel@brick \
--to=harvey.harrison@gmail.com \
--cc=arjan@infradead.org \
--cc=astarikovskiy@suse.de \
--cc=aystarik@gmail.com \
--cc=bunk@kernel.org \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=lenb@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=sam@ravnborg.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.