All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Cc: Adrian Bunk <bunk@kernel.org>, Sam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org>,
	Alexey Starikovskiy <aystarik@gmail.com>,
	lenb@kernel.org, astarikovskiy@suse.de,
	linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Arjan van de Ven <arjan@infradead.org>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
Subject: Re: [patch] x86: phase out forced inlining
Date: Mon, 3 Mar 2008 22:42:31 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080303224231.86c22ed0.akpm@linux-foundation.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20080303121335.GA15381@elte.hu>

On Mon, 3 Mar 2008 13:13:35 +0100 Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu> wrote:

> +config OPTIMIZE_INLINING
> +	bool "Allow gcc to uninline functions marked 'inline'"
> +	default y
> +	help
> +	  This option determines if the kernel forces gcc to inline the functions
> +	  developers have marked 'inline'. Doing so takes away freedom from gcc to
> +	  do what it thinks is best, which is desirable for the gcc 3.x series of
> +	  compilers. The gcc 4.x series have a rewritten inlining algorithm and
> +	  disabling this option will generate a smaller kernel there. Hopefully
> +	  this algorithm is so good that allowing gcc4 to make the decision can
> +	  become the default in the future, until then this option is there to
> +	  test gcc for this.

urgh.  This will cause whatever problem
4507a6a59cfc6997e532cd812a8bd244181e6205 fixed five years ago to resurface
for incautious gcc-3.x users.

I'd suggest that this

> +#ifndef CONFIG_OPTIMIZE_INLINING

become something along the lines of

> +#ifndef CONFIG_OPTIMIZE_INLINING && (__GNUC__ > 3)

It would be nice to be able to feed the gcc version into the Kconfig logic,
really..


  parent reply	other threads:[~2008-03-04  6:43 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 42+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-03-01 16:19 [2.6 patch] acpi/battery.c: make 2 functions static Adrian Bunk
2008-03-01 18:26 ` Alexey Starikovskiy
2008-03-01 18:35   ` Adrian Bunk
2008-03-01 18:42     ` Alexey Starikovskiy
2008-03-01 18:45       ` Adrian Bunk
2008-03-03  8:57     ` Ingo Molnar
2008-03-03  9:13       ` Adrian Bunk
2008-03-03  9:17         ` Ingo Molnar
2008-03-03  9:31           ` Sam Ravnborg
2008-03-03  9:48             ` Adrian Bunk
2008-03-03 10:39             ` Ingo Molnar
2008-03-03 11:34               ` Adrian Bunk
2008-03-03 11:45                 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-03-03 12:02                   ` Adrian Bunk
2008-03-03 12:10                     ` Ingo Molnar
2008-03-03 12:29                       ` Adrian Bunk
2008-03-03 12:50                         ` Ingo Molnar
2008-03-03 14:54                           ` Adrian Bunk
2008-03-03 15:01                             ` Adrian Bunk
2008-03-04 13:16                             ` Ingo Molnar
2008-03-04 13:47                               ` Adrian Bunk
2008-03-04 14:22                                 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-03-04 14:36                                   ` Jörn Engel
2008-03-04 14:36                                     ` Jörn Engel
2008-03-04 14:45                                     ` Ingo Molnar
2008-03-04 14:45                                       ` Ingo Molnar
2008-03-03 12:13                   ` [patch] x86: phase out forced inlining Ingo Molnar
2008-03-03 14:56                     ` Sam Ravnborg
2008-03-04 16:46                       ` Ingo Molnar
2008-03-04 18:07                         ` Harvey Harrison
2008-03-04 18:09                           ` H. Peter Anvin
2008-03-04 18:14                             ` Harvey Harrison
2008-03-04 18:18                             ` Harvey Harrison
2008-03-03 15:01                     ` Arjan van de Ven
2008-03-03 15:58                       ` Harvey Harrison
2008-03-04  6:42                     ` Andrew Morton [this message]
2008-03-04  7:32                       ` Ingo Molnar
2008-03-04  8:00                         ` Andrew Morton
2008-03-04  9:50                           ` Andi Kleen
2008-03-04  8:03                       ` Sam Ravnborg
2008-03-04  8:38                         ` Andrew Morton
2008-03-03  9:45           ` [2.6 patch] acpi/battery.c: make 2 functions static Adrian Bunk

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20080303224231.86c22ed0.akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --to=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=arjan@infradead.org \
    --cc=astarikovskiy@suse.de \
    --cc=aystarik@gmail.com \
    --cc=bunk@kernel.org \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=lenb@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=sam@ravnborg.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.