From: Lee Schermerhorn <Lee.Schermerhorn@hp.com>
To: Nishanth Aravamudan <nacc@us.ibm.com>
Cc: linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-mm <linux-mm@kvack.org>, Adam Litke <agl@us.ibm.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Mel Gorman <mel@csn.ul.ie>, Eric Whitney <eric.whitney@hp.com>
Subject: Re: [BUG] 2.6.25-rc4 hang/softlockups after freeing hugepages
Date: Thu, 06 Mar 2008 13:17:52 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1204827473.5294.77.camel@localhost> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20080306175311.GA14567@us.ibm.com>
On Thu, 2008-03-06 at 09:53 -0800, Nishanth Aravamudan wrote:
> On 06.03.2008 [12:23:03 -0500], Lee Schermerhorn wrote:
> > Test platform: HP Proliant DL585 server - 4 socket, dual core AMD with
> > 32GB memory.
> >
> > I first saw this on 25-rc2-mm1 with Mel's zonelist patches, while
> > investigating the interaction of hugepages and cpusets. Thinking that
> > it might be caused by the zonelist patches, I went back to 25-rc2-mm1
> > w/o the patches and saw the same thing. It sometimes takes a while for
> > the softlockups to start appearing, and I wanted to find a fairly
> > minimal duplicator. Meanwhile 25-rc3 and rc4 have come out, so I tried
> > the latest upstream kernel and see the same thing.
>
> So, does 2.6.25-rc2 show the problem? Or was it something introduced in
> that -mm which has since gone upstream?
>
I don't recall that I went back that far. I'll try Ingo's patch [later,
after an obligatory meeting...] and let you know.
<snip>
> > I took a look at the recent hugetlb patches from Adam and Nish, but none
> > seemed to address this symptom. I don't think I'm dealing with surplus
> > pages here.
>
> If /proc/sys/vm/nr_overcommit_hugepages = 0, then no, you're not.
I didn't set that, so it should have been zero.
Lee
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Lee Schermerhorn <Lee.Schermerhorn@hp.com>
To: Nishanth Aravamudan <nacc@us.ibm.com>
Cc: linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-mm <linux-mm@kvack.org>, Adam Litke <agl@us.ibm.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Mel Gorman <mel@csn.ul.ie>, Eric Whitney <eric.whitney@hp.com>
Subject: Re: [BUG] 2.6.25-rc4 hang/softlockups after freeing hugepages
Date: Thu, 06 Mar 2008 13:17:52 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1204827473.5294.77.camel@localhost> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20080306175311.GA14567@us.ibm.com>
On Thu, 2008-03-06 at 09:53 -0800, Nishanth Aravamudan wrote:
> On 06.03.2008 [12:23:03 -0500], Lee Schermerhorn wrote:
> > Test platform: HP Proliant DL585 server - 4 socket, dual core AMD with
> > 32GB memory.
> >
> > I first saw this on 25-rc2-mm1 with Mel's zonelist patches, while
> > investigating the interaction of hugepages and cpusets. Thinking that
> > it might be caused by the zonelist patches, I went back to 25-rc2-mm1
> > w/o the patches and saw the same thing. It sometimes takes a while for
> > the softlockups to start appearing, and I wanted to find a fairly
> > minimal duplicator. Meanwhile 25-rc3 and rc4 have come out, so I tried
> > the latest upstream kernel and see the same thing.
>
> So, does 2.6.25-rc2 show the problem? Or was it something introduced in
> that -mm which has since gone upstream?
>
I don't recall that I went back that far. I'll try Ingo's patch [later,
after an obligatory meeting...] and let you know.
<snip>
> > I took a look at the recent hugetlb patches from Adam and Nish, but none
> > seemed to address this symptom. I don't think I'm dealing with surplus
> > pages here.
>
> If /proc/sys/vm/nr_overcommit_hugepages = 0, then no, you're not.
I didn't set that, so it should have been zero.
Lee
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-03-06 18:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-03-06 17:23 [BUG] 2.6.25-rc4 hang/softlockups after freeing hugepages Lee Schermerhorn
2008-03-06 17:23 ` Lee Schermerhorn
2008-03-06 17:45 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-03-06 17:45 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-03-06 18:19 ` Lee Schermerhorn
2008-03-06 18:19 ` Lee Schermerhorn
2008-03-06 17:53 ` Nishanth Aravamudan
2008-03-06 17:53 ` Nishanth Aravamudan
2008-03-06 18:17 ` Lee Schermerhorn [this message]
2008-03-06 18:17 ` Lee Schermerhorn
2008-03-07 11:48 ` Mel Gorman
2008-03-07 11:48 ` Mel Gorman
2008-03-07 14:36 ` Lee Schermerhorn
2008-03-07 14:36 ` Lee Schermerhorn
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1204827473.5294.77.camel@localhost \
--to=lee.schermerhorn@hp.com \
--cc=agl@us.ibm.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=eric.whitney@hp.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mel@csn.ul.ie \
--cc=nacc@us.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.