All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: Daniel Walker <dwalker@mvista.com>
Cc: Jiri Kosina <jkosina@suse.cz>,
	Frank Munzert <frankm@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	mingo@elte.hu, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: BUG: lock held when returning to user space
Date: Thu, 13 Mar 2008 18:39:06 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1205429946.8514.255.camel@twins> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1205423029.10894.75.camel@localhost.localdomain>

On Thu, 2008-03-13 at 08:43 -0700, Daniel Walker wrote:
> On Wed, 2008-03-12 at 22:40 +0100, Jiri Kosina wrote:
> 
> > No, as it is a real bug if you use mutexes in this way. What happens if 
> > process that has called open() on your device (and has not closed it yet) 
> > calls fork()? 
> > Another breakage scenario -- what if the filedescriptor is sent through 
> > unix socket to another process? etc.
> 
> There's a number of places where a semaphore is used across system
> calls. 
> 
> for instance the usb skeleton, 
> 	drivers/usb/usb-skeleton.c
> 
> Several of the watchdog drivers,
> 	drivers/watchdog/s3c2410_wdt.c
> 
> These need to be removed, but the usage is clearly not compatible with
> the mutex API ..
> 
> If you convert them to atomic counts then you loose the sleeping aspect
> of the semaphore, which you'd have to add back somehow.
> 
> The only API that seems straight forward is using complete's .. Then you
> get an atomic count and all the sleeping function calls you might want..
> (include/linux/completion.h) The problem with complete's is that you
> can't start them out at "1" or "completed" unless you actually run
> complete() once during initialization (that's kind of ugly) ..

A simple waitqueue would work.


  reply	other threads:[~2008-03-13 17:41 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-03-12 15:45 BUG: lock held when returning to user space Frank Munzert
2008-03-12 16:29 ` Vegard Nossum
2008-03-12 21:40 ` Jiri Kosina
2008-03-13 15:43   ` Daniel Walker
2008-03-13 17:39     ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2008-03-13 17:56       ` Daniel Walker
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2008-03-13 16:49 J.C. Pizarro
2007-10-27 14:19 Gabriel C
2007-10-27 15:12 ` Jiri Kosina
2007-10-27 15:28   ` Peter Zijlstra
2007-10-27 15:46     ` Andrew Morton
2007-10-28 11:12       ` Jiri Kosina
2007-10-29 12:20         ` Alessandro Zummo
2007-10-27 16:35     ` Linus Torvalds
2007-10-27 22:47     ` Jiri Kosina
2007-10-27 15:47   ` Arjan van de Ven
2007-10-27 16:09     ` Peter Zijlstra
2007-10-27 17:05       ` Arjan van de Ven

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1205429946.8514.255.camel@twins \
    --to=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=dwalker@mvista.com \
    --cc=frankm@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=jkosina@suse.cz \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.