From: Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Gerald Schaefer <gerald.schaefer@de.ibm.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Paul Mundt <lethal@linux-sh.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] hugetlbfs: architecture header cleanup
Date: Wed, 09 Apr 2008 13:35:55 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1207740955.878.5.camel@localhost> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20080407205906.25bd06c6.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
On Mon, 2008-04-07 at 20:59 -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> Seem that git-s390 is currently carrying the old versions of these patches.
>
> I'll drop git-s390. Which will presumably kick off a cascade of droppages
> due to git-s390 versus git-kvm damage control. All of which will need to
> be undropped in some fashion when those trees come to their senses. Ho
> hum.
Yes, git-s390 wasn't updated for a few days. I've dropped all the
hugetlbfs patches since the version we will push upstream depends on the
cleanup which will go in over -mm. I keep the fingers crossed that the
git-s390 now works again.
--
blue skies,
Martin.
"Reality continues to ruin my life." - Calvin.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-04-09 11:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-04-04 16:45 [PATCH 0/3] hugetlbfs: cleanup and new primitives for s390, v3 Gerald Schaefer
2008-04-04 16:49 ` [PATCH 1/3] hugetlbfs: architecture header cleanup Gerald Schaefer
2008-04-08 3:59 ` Andrew Morton
2008-04-09 11:35 ` Martin Schwidefsky [this message]
2008-04-04 16:51 ` [PATCH 2/3] hugetlbfs: add missing TLB flush to hugetlb_cow() Gerald Schaefer
2008-04-04 17:02 ` [PATCH 3/3] hugetlbfs: common code update for s390 Gerald Schaefer
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2008-04-02 14:17 [PATCH 0/3] hugetlbfs: cleanup and new primitives " Gerald Schaefer
2008-04-02 14:26 ` [PATCH 1/3] hugetlbfs: architecture header cleanup Gerald Schaefer
2008-04-02 17:42 ` Dave Hansen
2008-04-02 19:07 ` Heiko Carstens
2008-04-03 21:43 ` Andrew Morton
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1207740955.878.5.camel@localhost \
--to=schwidefsky@de.ibm.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=gerald.schaefer@de.ibm.com \
--cc=lethal@linux-sh.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=paulus@samba.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=tony.luck@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.