All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jerone Young <jyoung5@us.ibm.com>
To: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Cc: kvm-ppc-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org
Subject: Re: [kvm-ppc-devel] [PATCH] [v5] Add idle wait support for 44x
Date: Thu, 10 Apr 2008 20:08:51 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1207858131.26428.4.camel@thinkpadL> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200804101544.44457.arnd@arndb.de>

On Thu, 2008-04-10 at 15:44 +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Tuesday 08 April 2008, Jerone Young wrote:
> > +static struct sleep_mode modes[] = {
> > +       { .name = "wait", .entry = &ppc44x_idle },
> > +       { .name = "spin", .entry = NULL },
> > +};
> > +
> > +int __init ppc44x_idle_init(void)
> > +{
> > +       void *func = modes[current_mode].entry;
> > +       ppc_md.power_save = func;
> > +       return 0;
> > +}
> > +
> > +arch_initcall(ppc44x_idle_init);
> > +
> > +static int __init idle_param(char *p)
> > +{ 
> > +       int i;
> > +
> > +       for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(modes); i++) {
> > +               if (!strcmp(modes[i].name, p)) {
> > +                       current_mode = i;
> > +                       break;
> > +               }
> > +       }
> > +
> > +       return 0;
> > +}
> > +
> > +early_param("idle", idle_param);
> 
> ok, sorry to steal the show again, now that everyone seems to be happy
> with the current code, but isn't this equivalent to the simple

Well it could be this simple. But the current code leaves a lot more
room to add different type waits or spins if need be (if they are ever
needed ... though none off the top of my head at the moment)...but it
does allow you to create another wait state for whatever reason a lot
easier.

So I really don't think this needs to change. Unless everyone really
feels that it just has to be.

> 
> static int __init idle_param(char *p)
> {
> 	if (!strcmp(modes[i].name, "spin"))
> 		ppc_md.power_save = NULL;
> }
> early_param("idle", idle_param);
> 
> if you statically initialize the ppc_md.power_save function to ppc44x_idle
> in the platform setup files?

The idea is to not statically initialize ppc_md.power_save to
ppc44x_idle in each platform setup file.

> 
> 	Arnd <><


-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by the 2008 JavaOne(SM) Conference 
Don't miss this year's exciting event. There's still time to save $100. 
Use priority code J8TL2D2. 
http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;198757673;13503038;p?http://java.sun.com/javaone
_______________________________________________
kvm-ppc-devel mailing list
kvm-ppc-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/kvm-ppc-devel

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Jerone Young <jyoung5@us.ibm.com>
To: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Cc: kvm-ppc-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] [v5] Add idle wait support for 44x platforms
Date: Thu, 10 Apr 2008 15:08:51 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1207858131.26428.4.camel@thinkpadL> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200804101544.44457.arnd@arndb.de>

On Thu, 2008-04-10 at 15:44 +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Tuesday 08 April 2008, Jerone Young wrote:
> > +static struct sleep_mode modes[] = {
> > +       { .name = "wait", .entry = &ppc44x_idle },
> > +       { .name = "spin", .entry = NULL },
> > +};
> > +
> > +int __init ppc44x_idle_init(void)
> > +{
> > +       void *func = modes[current_mode].entry;
> > +       ppc_md.power_save = func;
> > +       return 0;
> > +}
> > +
> > +arch_initcall(ppc44x_idle_init);
> > +
> > +static int __init idle_param(char *p)
> > +{ 
> > +       int i;
> > +
> > +       for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(modes); i++) {
> > +               if (!strcmp(modes[i].name, p)) {
> > +                       current_mode = i;
> > +                       break;
> > +               }
> > +       }
> > +
> > +       return 0;
> > +}
> > +
> > +early_param("idle", idle_param);
> 
> ok, sorry to steal the show again, now that everyone seems to be happy
> with the current code, but isn't this equivalent to the simple

Well it could be this simple. But the current code leaves a lot more
room to add different type waits or spins if need be (if they are ever
needed ... though none off the top of my head at the moment)...but it
does allow you to create another wait state for whatever reason a lot
easier.

So I really don't think this needs to change. Unless everyone really
feels that it just has to be.

> 
> static int __init idle_param(char *p)
> {
> 	if (!strcmp(modes[i].name, "spin"))
> 		ppc_md.power_save = NULL;
> }
> early_param("idle", idle_param);
> 
> if you statically initialize the ppc_md.power_save function to ppc44x_idle
> in the platform setup files?

The idea is to not statically initialize ppc_md.power_save to
ppc44x_idle in each platform setup file.

> 
> 	Arnd <><

  reply	other threads:[~2008-04-10 20:08 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-04-08 16:49 [kvm-ppc-devel] [PATCH] [v5] Add idle wait support for 44x platforms Jerone Young
2008-04-08 16:49 ` Jerone Young
2008-04-08 19:43 ` [kvm-ppc-devel] [PATCH] [v5] Add idle wait support for 44x Hollis Blanchard
2008-04-08 19:43   ` [kvm-ppc-devel] [PATCH] [v5] Add idle wait support for 44x platforms Hollis Blanchard
2008-04-10 11:53 ` [kvm-ppc-devel] [PATCH] [v5] Add idle wait support for 44x Josh Boyer
2008-04-10 11:53   ` [PATCH] [v5] Add idle wait support for 44x platforms Josh Boyer
2008-04-10 13:44 ` [kvm-ppc-devel] [PATCH] [v5] Add idle wait support for 44x Arnd Bergmann
2008-04-10 13:44   ` [PATCH] [v5] Add idle wait support for 44x platforms Arnd Bergmann
2008-04-10 20:08   ` Jerone Young [this message]
2008-04-10 20:08     ` Jerone Young
2008-04-11  0:18     ` [kvm-ppc-devel] [PATCH] [v5] Add idle wait support for 44x Arnd Bergmann
2008-04-11  0:18       ` [PATCH] [v5] Add idle wait support for 44x platforms Arnd Bergmann
2008-04-11  1:02       ` [kvm-ppc-devel] [PATCH] [v5] Add idle wait support for 44x Josh Boyer
2008-04-11  1:02         ` [PATCH] [v5] Add idle wait support for 44x platforms Josh Boyer
2008-04-11  5:31       ` [kvm-ppc-devel] [PATCH] [v5] Add idle wait support for 44x Olof Johansson
2008-04-11  5:31         ` [PATCH] [v5] Add idle wait support for 44x platforms Olof Johansson

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1207858131.26428.4.camel@thinkpadL \
    --to=jyoung5@us.ibm.com \
    --cc=arnd@arndb.de \
    --cc=kvm-ppc-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.