All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Kasper Sandberg <lkml@metanurb.dk>
To: David Lethe <david@santools.com>
Cc: alex14641@yahoo.com, Justin Piszcz <jpiszcz@lucidpixels.com>,
	linux-raid@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: RE: Sharing disks amoung multiple software RAIDs
Date: Fri, 02 May 2008 04:42:59 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1209696179.16523.13.camel@localhost> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <A20315AE59B5C34585629E258D76A97C335477@34093-C3-EVS3.exchange.rackspace.com>

On Thu, 2008-05-01 at 21:31 -0500, David Lethe wrote:
> In a perfect world, my expectation is that sharing a disk is safe and
> even a reasonable thing to do. The shared disk is effectively a range of
> addressable blocks in the same way an individual disk or even a hardware
> RAID LUN is a range of blocks. From this limited perspective, the only
> penalty is performance related, assuming you don't mind having to
> explain yourself to an IT supervisor somewhere in your company.
> 
> However, consider what COULD happen in event of a drive failure, either
> with the shared or an unshared disk. What are the odds all of the
> failure scenarios have been tested for all ATA and SCSI command sets;
> with threaded I/Os pending; with dirty cache; bus resets when hardware
> dies; etc... ?
> 
> The odds are zero.  Look how many problems people post to the thread on
> a weekly basis where people lose their data when md rebuilds go bad with
> non-shared disks.  Why make the problem worse?

What? are you saying linux md is unreliable?! in other words, would i be
safer to run rsync every day to my other disk, and run in non-raid
mode?!

> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: linux-raid-owner@vger.kernel.org
> [mailto:linux-raid-owner@vger.kernel.org] On Behalf Of Alex Davis
> Sent: Thursday, May 01, 2008 8:52 PM
> To: Justin Piszcz; Kasper Sandberg
> Cc: linux-raid@vger.kernel.org; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
> Subject: Re: Sharing disks amoung multiple software RAIDs
> 
> --- On Thu, 5/1/08, Kasper Sandberg <lkml@metanurb.dk> wrote:
> 
> > From: Kasper Sandberg <lkml@metanurb.dk>
> > Subject: Re: Sharing disks amoung multiple software RAIDs
> > To: "Justin Piszcz" <jpiszcz@lucidpixels.com>
> > Cc: "Alex Davis" <alex14641@yahoo.com>, linux-raid@vger.kernel.org,
> linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
> > Date: Thursday, May 1, 2008, 9:39 PM
> > On Thu, 2008-05-01 at 08:50 -0400, Justin Piszcz wrote:
> > > 
> > > On Thu, 1 May 2008, Alex Davis wrote:
> > > 
> > > > Is this a bad thing? I'm guessing that it is,
> > but I want independent
> > > > confirmation before I spoke to someone I know
> > who's doing this.
> > > >
> > > > Thanks
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >     
> >
> ________________________________________________________________________
> ____________
> > > > Be a better friend, newshound, and
> > > > know-it-all with Yahoo! Mobile.  Try it now. 
> > http://mobile.yahoo.com/;_ylt=Ahu06i62sR8HDtDypao8Wcj9tAcJ
> > > > --
> > > > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line
> > "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
> > > > the body of a message to
> > majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> > > > More majordomo info at 
> > http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> > > >
> > > 
> > > What is the use case, why would you want to do that?
> > > I have seen people on the list do it before, for
> > example are you going to 
> > > be utilizing both raids at the same time?  If so, I
> > would advise against 
> > > it.
> > > 
> > > What is the reasoning?
> > 
> > I do this!
> > 
> > is this really bad? i would surely like a list of reasons
> > why..
> > 
> > I do it because.. well.. first off, it allows me to have
> > /boot on
> > different raidlevel than / or /home without extra disks.
> > secondly, it allows me to with the same disks use different
> > filesystems.. for instance, it allows me to have /home
> > encrypted with
> > dm-crypt, while still raided.. Not that i would mind
> > encrypting /
> > and /home as 1 partition, but it creates a whole slew of
> > issues with
> > having to create initrd and stuff..
> > 
> > I realize that performance probably suffers abit from this,
> > but well..
> > is there any stability or security wise risk? i mostly use
> > raid1 and
> > raid5 only..
> > 
> I would guess if the RAIDs are heavily used simultaneously it could
> cause the disk head actuators to jump around more, causing more wear
> and tear.
> 
> 
>  
> ________________________________________________________________________
> ____________
> Be a better friend, newshound, and 
> know-it-all with Yahoo! Mobile.  Try it now.
> http://mobile.yahoo.com/;_ylt=Ahu06i62sR8HDtDypao8Wcj9tAcJ
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> 
> 


  reply	other threads:[~2008-05-02  2:42 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-05-01 11:35 Sharing disks amoung multiple software RAIDs Alex Davis
2008-05-01 12:50 ` Justin Piszcz
2008-05-01 13:42   ` Alex Davis
2008-05-02 21:24     ` Bill Davidsen
2008-05-02  1:39   ` Kasper Sandberg
2008-05-02  1:51     ` Alex Davis
2008-05-02  2:31       ` David Lethe
2008-05-02  2:31         ` David Lethe
2008-05-02  2:42         ` Kasper Sandberg [this message]
2008-05-02  7:06           ` David Rees
2008-05-02  8:09             ` Kasper Sandberg
2008-05-02  8:25               ` David Greaves
2008-05-02 21:43                 ` Kasper Sandberg
2008-05-02 21:43                   ` Kasper Sandberg
2008-05-02 22:04                   ` Alex Davis
2008-05-02 22:24                   ` David Lethe
2008-05-02 22:24                     ` David Lethe
2008-05-03  0:44                     ` Alex Davis
2008-05-03 10:13                       ` Keld Jørn Simonsen
2008-05-03  3:11                     ` Kasper Sandberg
2008-05-02 10:25               ` Keld Jørn Simonsen
     [not found]                 ` <481E0726.1030501@harddata.com>
     [not found]                   ` <20080504212927.GB20650@rap.rap.dk>
     [not found]                     ` <481E3374.4070105@harddata.com>
2008-05-04 23:10                       ` Keld Jørn Simonsen
2008-05-04 23:17                         ` Keld Jørn Simonsen
2008-05-02 13:43               ` Helge Hafting
2008-05-02 14:13                 ` Alex Davis
2008-05-01 12:51 ` David Greaves
2008-05-02  1:23 ` Nick Andrew
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2008-05-02  8:36 George Spelvin
2008-05-02 11:07 ` Alex Davis
2008-05-02 13:26   ` Richard Michael

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1209696179.16523.13.camel@localhost \
    --to=lkml@metanurb.dk \
    --cc=alex14641@yahoo.com \
    --cc=david@santools.com \
    --cc=jpiszcz@lucidpixels.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.