Re: [PATCH stable] libertas: Extend CMD_MESH_CONFIG to get and set persistent mesh default params.

[Dan Williams <dcbw@redhat.com>]

On Fri, 2008-05-16 at 17:51 +0200, Stefanik G=C3=A1bor wrote:
> On Fri, May 16, 2008 at 4:50 PM, Johannes Berg
> <johannes@sipsolutions.net> wrote:
> > On Fri, 2008-05-16 at 15:09 +0100, David Woodhouse wrote:
> >> On Thu, 2008-05-15 at 11:01 -0700, Brian Cavagnolo wrote:
> >> > This patch is based on a patch from Shailendra Govardhan.  It in=
troduces
> >> > several new iwprivs: {get,set}_bootflag {get,set}_boottime {get,=
set}_def_chan
> >> > {get,set}_def_protid {get,set}_def_metid {get,set}_def_meshcap
> >> > {get,set}_def_meshid.  These commands are only supported on Marv=
ell hardware
> >> > that implements persistent defaults, such as the OLPC Active Ant=
enna.
> >> > Accordingly, this patch may not be suitable for upstream merging=
=2E
> >
> >> But this is the _one_ thing which might actually be OK to do with =
a
> >> private ioctl, since it's very hardware-specific. Unlike like all =
the
> >> mesh-mangling stuff where we really ought to be compatible with o1=
1s.
> >>
> >> So maybe, just maybe, we _can_ do this with iwpriv and push that
> >> upstream.
> >
> > Maybe we do, after all, need an iwpriv equivalent in cfg80211/nl802=
11 so
> > that we can kill wext at some point.
> >
> > Or maybe this should be in sysfs or so?
> >
> > johannes
> >
>=20
> Or maybe in configfs? That's a better place for configuration options=
=2E
> (BTW rt2x00 uses debugfs as an iwpriv replacement, so that's another
> possibility.)

I keep proposing debugfs too, but in some cases the commands aren't jus=
t
for poking around with stuff.  configfs is probably a better answer to
tweakables that aren't just ricer-geekporn.

Dan

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireles=
s" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html