From: Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de>
To: Greg Smith <gsmith@gregsmith.com>
Cc: lkml <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Subject: Re: PostgreSQL pgbench performance regression in 2.6.23+
Date: Thu, 22 May 2008 09:10:07 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1211440207.5733.8.camel@marge.simson.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.GSO.4.64.0805211115390.8451@westnet.com>
On Wed, 2008-05-21 at 13:34 -0400, Greg Smith wrote:
> PostgreSQL ships with a simple database benchmarking tool named pgbench,
> in what's labeled the contrib section (in many distributions it's a
> separate package from the main server/client ones). I see there's been
> some work done already improving how the PostgreSQL server works under the
> new scheduler (the "Poor PostgreSQL scaling on Linux 2.6.25-rc5" thread).
> I wanted to provide you a different test case using pgbench that has taken
> a sharp dive starting with 2.6.23, and the server improvement changes in
> 2.6.25 actually made this problem worse.
>
> I think it will be easy for someone else to replicate my results and I'll
> go over the exact procedure below.
Yup, I can reproduce. Running the test with 2.6.25.4, everything is
waking/running on one CPU, leaving my box 75% idle. Not good.
-Mike
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-05-22 7:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 38+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-05-21 17:34 PostgreSQL pgbench performance regression in 2.6.23+ Greg Smith
2008-05-22 7:10 ` Mike Galbraith [this message]
2008-05-22 8:28 ` Dhaval Giani
2008-05-22 9:05 ` Mike Galbraith
2008-05-22 10:34 ` Mike Galbraith
2008-05-22 11:25 ` Mike Galbraith
2008-05-22 11:44 ` Peter Zijlstra
2008-05-22 12:09 ` Mike Galbraith
2008-05-22 12:24 ` Peter Zijlstra
2008-05-22 13:16 ` Mike Galbraith
2008-05-23 7:13 ` Greg Smith
2008-05-23 10:00 ` Mike Galbraith
2008-05-23 10:10 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-05-23 10:15 ` Mike Galbraith
2008-05-23 23:18 ` Greg Smith
2008-05-23 23:46 ` Mike Galbraith
2008-05-24 8:08 ` Mike Galbraith
2008-05-27 0:28 ` Greg Smith
2008-05-27 5:59 ` [patch] " Mike Galbraith
2008-05-27 8:20 ` Mike Galbraith
2008-05-27 8:35 ` Mike Galbraith
2008-06-06 5:03 ` Greg Smith
2008-06-06 6:13 ` Mike Galbraith
2008-06-07 11:38 ` Mike Galbraith
2008-06-07 12:50 ` Mike Galbraith
2008-06-07 13:07 ` Peter Zijlstra
2008-06-07 14:16 ` Mike Galbraith
2008-06-07 16:16 ` Peter Zijlstra
2008-06-07 17:56 ` Mike Galbraith
2008-06-07 13:08 ` Peter Zijlstra
2008-06-07 14:54 ` [patch part 2] " Mike Galbraith
2008-06-07 16:12 ` Peter Zijlstra
2008-06-07 17:53 ` Mike Galbraith
2008-06-07 18:19 ` Mike Galbraith
2008-05-23 13:05 ` Mike Galbraith
2008-05-23 13:35 ` Mike Galbraith
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2008-05-23 11:26 Anton Petrusevich
2008-05-23 18:46 ` Greg Smith
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1211440207.5733.8.camel@marge.simson.net \
--to=efault@gmx.de \
--cc=gsmith@gregsmith.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.