All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
To: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>
Cc: Linux PPC devel <linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org>,
	Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@goop.org>,
	Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Virtualization Mailing List <virtualization@lists.osdl.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC 1/3] hvc_console: rework setup to replace irq functions with callbacks (not word wrapped)
Date: Wed, 04 Jun 2008 19:06:42 +1000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1212570402.9496.72.camel@pasglop> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200806031449.14385.borntraeger@de.ibm.com>

On Tue, 2008-06-03 at 14:49 +0200, Christian Borntraeger wrote:
> This patch tries to change hvc_console to not use request_irq/free_irq if
> the backend does not use irqs. This allows virtio_console to use hvc_console
> without having a linker reference to request_irq/free_irq.
> 
> The irq specific code is moved to hvc_irq.c and selected by the drivers that
> use irqs (System p, System i, XEN).
> 
> I replaced "irq" with the opaque name "data". The request_irq and free_irq
> calls are replaced with notifier_add and notifier_del. I have also changed
> the code a bit to call the notifier_add and notifier_del inside the spinlock
> area as the callbacks are found via hp->ops.
> 
> Feedback is appreciated.

I haven't looked at the patch proper but I agree with the basic
premises. We routinely use hvc_console for things that don't have an
irq. In fact, David even did a backend hooking up to udbg which is
useful when bringing up weird stuffs :-)

Cheers,
Ben.

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
To: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>
Cc: Linux PPC devel <linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org>,
	Virtualization Mailing List <virtualization@lists.osdl.org>,
	Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@goop.org>,
	Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC 1/3] hvc_console: rework setup to replace irq functions with callbacks (not word wrapped)
Date: Wed, 04 Jun 2008 19:06:42 +1000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1212570402.9496.72.camel@pasglop> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200806031449.14385.borntraeger@de.ibm.com>

On Tue, 2008-06-03 at 14:49 +0200, Christian Borntraeger wrote:
> This patch tries to change hvc_console to not use request_irq/free_irq if
> the backend does not use irqs. This allows virtio_console to use hvc_console
> without having a linker reference to request_irq/free_irq.
> 
> The irq specific code is moved to hvc_irq.c and selected by the drivers that
> use irqs (System p, System i, XEN).
> 
> I replaced "irq" with the opaque name "data". The request_irq and free_irq
> calls are replaced with notifier_add and notifier_del. I have also changed
> the code a bit to call the notifier_add and notifier_del inside the spinlock
> area as the callbacks are found via hp->ops.
> 
> Feedback is appreciated.

I haven't looked at the patch proper but I agree with the basic
premises. We routinely use hvc_console for things that don't have an
irq. In fact, David even did a backend hooking up to udbg which is
useful when bringing up weird stuffs :-)

Cheers,
Ben.



  parent reply	other threads:[~2008-06-04  9:09 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 49+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-06-03 12:44 [RFC 0/3]: hvc_console rework for platform without hard irqs Christian Borntraeger
2008-06-03 12:44 ` Christian Borntraeger
2008-06-03 12:45 ` [RFC 1/3] hvc_console: rework setup to replace irq functions with callbacks Christian Borntraeger
2008-06-03 12:45   ` Christian Borntraeger
2008-06-03 12:45   ` Christian Borntraeger
2008-06-04  0:13   ` Rusty Russell
2008-06-04  0:13     ` Rusty Russell
2008-06-04 11:15     ` Christian Borntraeger
2008-06-04 11:15       ` Christian Borntraeger
2008-10-13  5:16   ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2008-10-13  5:16     ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2008-10-13  7:51     ` Christian Borntraeger
2008-10-13  7:51       ` Christian Borntraeger
2008-10-13  8:36       ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2008-10-13  8:36         ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2008-10-13  8:47         ` Christian Borntraeger
2008-10-13  8:47           ` Christian Borntraeger
2008-10-13  9:52           ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2008-10-13  9:52             ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2008-10-14  0:38       ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2008-10-14  0:38         ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2008-10-14  6:42         ` Christian Borntraeger
2008-10-14  6:42           ` Christian Borntraeger
2008-10-14  8:18           ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2008-10-14  8:18             ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2008-06-03 12:46 ` [RFC 2/3] virtio_console: use virtqueue notification for hvc_console Christian Borntraeger
2008-06-03 12:46   ` Christian Borntraeger
2008-06-03 17:24   ` Arnd Bergmann
2008-06-03 17:24     ` Arnd Bergmann
2008-06-03 17:24     ` Arnd Bergmann
2008-06-03 12:46 ` [RFC 3/3] s390: use virtio_console for KVM on s390 Christian Borntraeger
2008-06-03 12:46   ` Christian Borntraeger
2008-06-03 12:49 ` [RFC 1/3] hvc_console: rework setup to replace irq functions with callbacks (not word wrapped) Christian Borntraeger
2008-06-03 12:49   ` Christian Borntraeger
2008-06-03 17:30   ` Arnd Bergmann
2008-06-03 17:30     ` Arnd Bergmann
2008-06-04  8:00     ` Christian Borntraeger
2008-06-04  8:00       ` Christian Borntraeger
2008-06-04  9:06   ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt [this message]
2008-06-04  9:06     ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2008-06-20 13:24 ` [RFC 1/3 v2] hvc_console: rework setup to replace irq functions with callbacks Christian Borntraeger
2008-06-20 13:24   ` Christian Borntraeger
2008-06-27  5:27   ` Rusty Russell
2008-06-27  5:27     ` Rusty Russell
2008-06-20 13:24 ` [RFC 2/3 v2] virtio_console: use virtqueue notification for hvc_console Christian Borntraeger
2008-06-20 13:24   ` Christian Borntraeger
2008-06-20 13:24 ` [RFC 3/3 v2] s390: use virtio_console for KVM on s390 Christian Borntraeger
2008-06-20 13:24   ` Christian Borntraeger
2008-06-23  3:04   ` Rusty Russell

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1212570402.9496.72.camel@pasglop \
    --to=benh@kernel.crashing.org \
    --cc=borntraeger@de.ibm.com \
    --cc=jeremy@goop.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org \
    --cc=rusty@rustcorp.com.au \
    --cc=virtualization@lists.osdl.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.