From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
To: Timur Tabi <timur@freescale.com>
Cc: Scott Wood <scottwood@freescale.com>,
linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org, Stefan Roese <sr@denx.de>
Subject: Re: "cell-index" vs. "index" vs. no index in I2C device nodes
Date: Fri, 06 Jun 2008 14:19:04 +1000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1212725944.12464.18.camel@pasglop> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4848028B.5060105@freescale.com>
On Thu, 2008-06-05 at 10:13 -0500, Timur Tabi wrote:
> Josh Boyer wrote:
>
> > From a device tree perspective, index and cell-index are both
> > incorrect. The IIC macros don't share register blocks with anything,
> > are enumerated as unique instances per macro in the device tree, and
> > should be able to be distinguished by "regs" and/or unit address.
>
> I think we should just expand the definition of cell-index to include standard
> device enumeration for when it's needed. The original definition is too
> limited, IMHO.
No. I disagree. Expanding the definition is the wrong thing to do, and
as I pointed out in an earlier mail, will not work well with SMP or
multi-chip setups.
Ben.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-06-06 4:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 74+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-06-04 15:06 "cell-index" vs. "index" vs. no index in I2C device nodes Stefan Roese
2008-06-04 15:24 ` Timur Tabi
2008-06-04 15:43 ` Scott Wood
2008-06-05 2:19 ` Josh Boyer
2008-06-05 2:41 ` David Gibson
2008-06-06 2:40 ` Segher Boessenkool
2008-06-06 3:37 ` David Gibson
2008-06-07 0:30 ` Segher Boessenkool
2008-06-06 4:07 ` Grant Likely
2008-06-06 4:29 ` Sean MacLennan
2008-06-05 2:54 ` Sean MacLennan
2008-06-05 3:05 ` Josh Boyer
2008-06-05 3:16 ` Sean MacLennan
2008-06-05 6:22 ` Stefan Roese
2008-06-05 7:48 ` Jean Delvare
2008-06-05 8:45 ` Stefan Roese
2008-06-05 10:57 ` David Gibson
2008-06-05 11:52 ` Josh Boyer
2008-06-05 15:18 ` Timur Tabi
2008-06-05 22:47 ` David Gibson
2008-06-06 4:17 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2008-06-06 4:16 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2008-06-06 6:21 ` Jean Delvare
2008-06-06 7:47 ` Grant Likely
2008-06-06 8:45 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2008-06-05 15:17 ` Timur Tabi
2008-06-05 15:44 ` Jochen Friedrich
2008-06-05 15:50 ` Timur Tabi
2008-06-05 16:10 ` Grant Likely
2008-06-05 16:18 ` Timur Tabi
2008-06-05 16:22 ` Jochen Friedrich
2008-06-05 16:30 ` Grant Likely
2008-06-05 16:40 ` Timur Tabi
2008-06-05 22:46 ` David Gibson
2008-06-05 16:35 ` Grant Likely
2008-06-05 23:59 ` Josh Boyer
2008-06-07 0:24 ` Segher Boessenkool
2008-06-05 21:37 ` Sean MacLennan
2008-06-05 23:48 ` Josh Boyer
2008-06-05 15:13 ` Timur Tabi
2008-06-05 15:39 ` Grant Likely
2008-06-05 15:43 ` Timur Tabi
2008-06-05 15:52 ` Segher Boessenkool
2008-06-05 16:09 ` Timur Tabi
2008-06-05 16:27 ` Scott Wood
2008-06-05 17:52 ` Timur Tabi
2008-06-05 18:04 ` Scott Wood
2008-06-05 16:00 ` Grant Likely
2008-06-05 16:13 ` Timur Tabi
2008-06-05 16:21 ` Josh Boyer
2008-06-05 16:25 ` Timur Tabi
2008-06-05 16:37 ` Grant Likely
2008-06-05 18:27 ` Josh Boyer
2008-06-05 18:35 ` Timur Tabi
2008-06-05 18:40 ` Josh Boyer
2008-06-05 18:46 ` Grant Likely
2008-06-05 18:56 ` Josh Boyer
2008-06-05 19:14 ` Grant Likely
2008-06-05 19:15 ` Josh Boyer
2008-06-05 19:16 ` Timur Tabi
2008-06-05 21:31 ` Segher Boessenkool
2008-06-05 22:56 ` David Gibson
2008-06-06 13:09 ` Timur Tabi
2008-06-06 13:42 ` Stefan Roese
2008-06-05 22:45 ` Sean MacLennan
2008-06-06 4:20 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2008-06-25 21:46 ` Timur Tabi
2008-06-27 16:48 ` Jochen Friedrich
2008-06-05 15:46 ` Segher Boessenkool
2008-06-05 15:52 ` Jochen Friedrich
2008-06-05 15:53 ` Grant Likely
2008-06-06 4:19 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt [this message]
2008-06-06 4:14 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2008-06-06 4:13 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1212725944.12464.18.camel@pasglop \
--to=benh@kernel.crashing.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org \
--cc=scottwood@freescale.com \
--cc=sr@denx.de \
--cc=timur@freescale.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.