From: Segher Boessenkool <segher@kernel.crashing.org>
To: "Grant Likely" <grant.likely@secretlab.ca>
Cc: Scott Wood <scottwood@freescale.com>,
linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org, Stefan Roese <sr@denx.de>,
Timur Tabi <timur@freescale.com>
Subject: Re: "cell-index" vs. "index" vs. no index in I2C device nodes
Date: Thu, 5 Jun 2008 17:46:15 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <459415320e72f1bd92d036b29c80baae@kernel.crashing.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <fa686aa40806050839h55d8e358m93248414507f10e2@mail.gmail.com>
>> I think we should just expand the definition of cell-index to include
>> standard
>> device enumeration for when it's needed. The original definition is
>> too
>> limited, IMHO.
>
> nak
>
> if you need explicit indexing then use an alias. My opinion however
> is that explicit indexing is unnecessary and is just an artifact of
> current i2c subsystem internals. There is already enough information
> in the device tree to match i2c devices with i2c busses without
> resorting to indexes.
Fully agreed. Let me say it as well, it makes me feel powerful:
NAK
Segher
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-06-05 15:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 74+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-06-04 15:06 "cell-index" vs. "index" vs. no index in I2C device nodes Stefan Roese
2008-06-04 15:24 ` Timur Tabi
2008-06-04 15:43 ` Scott Wood
2008-06-05 2:19 ` Josh Boyer
2008-06-05 2:41 ` David Gibson
2008-06-06 2:40 ` Segher Boessenkool
2008-06-06 3:37 ` David Gibson
2008-06-07 0:30 ` Segher Boessenkool
2008-06-06 4:07 ` Grant Likely
2008-06-06 4:29 ` Sean MacLennan
2008-06-05 2:54 ` Sean MacLennan
2008-06-05 3:05 ` Josh Boyer
2008-06-05 3:16 ` Sean MacLennan
2008-06-05 6:22 ` Stefan Roese
2008-06-05 7:48 ` Jean Delvare
2008-06-05 8:45 ` Stefan Roese
2008-06-05 10:57 ` David Gibson
2008-06-05 11:52 ` Josh Boyer
2008-06-05 15:18 ` Timur Tabi
2008-06-05 22:47 ` David Gibson
2008-06-06 4:17 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2008-06-06 4:16 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2008-06-06 6:21 ` Jean Delvare
2008-06-06 7:47 ` Grant Likely
2008-06-06 8:45 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2008-06-05 15:17 ` Timur Tabi
2008-06-05 15:44 ` Jochen Friedrich
2008-06-05 15:50 ` Timur Tabi
2008-06-05 16:10 ` Grant Likely
2008-06-05 16:18 ` Timur Tabi
2008-06-05 16:22 ` Jochen Friedrich
2008-06-05 16:30 ` Grant Likely
2008-06-05 16:40 ` Timur Tabi
2008-06-05 22:46 ` David Gibson
2008-06-05 16:35 ` Grant Likely
2008-06-05 23:59 ` Josh Boyer
2008-06-07 0:24 ` Segher Boessenkool
2008-06-05 21:37 ` Sean MacLennan
2008-06-05 23:48 ` Josh Boyer
2008-06-05 15:13 ` Timur Tabi
2008-06-05 15:39 ` Grant Likely
2008-06-05 15:43 ` Timur Tabi
2008-06-05 15:52 ` Segher Boessenkool
2008-06-05 16:09 ` Timur Tabi
2008-06-05 16:27 ` Scott Wood
2008-06-05 17:52 ` Timur Tabi
2008-06-05 18:04 ` Scott Wood
2008-06-05 16:00 ` Grant Likely
2008-06-05 16:13 ` Timur Tabi
2008-06-05 16:21 ` Josh Boyer
2008-06-05 16:25 ` Timur Tabi
2008-06-05 16:37 ` Grant Likely
2008-06-05 18:27 ` Josh Boyer
2008-06-05 18:35 ` Timur Tabi
2008-06-05 18:40 ` Josh Boyer
2008-06-05 18:46 ` Grant Likely
2008-06-05 18:56 ` Josh Boyer
2008-06-05 19:14 ` Grant Likely
2008-06-05 19:15 ` Josh Boyer
2008-06-05 19:16 ` Timur Tabi
2008-06-05 21:31 ` Segher Boessenkool
2008-06-05 22:56 ` David Gibson
2008-06-06 13:09 ` Timur Tabi
2008-06-06 13:42 ` Stefan Roese
2008-06-05 22:45 ` Sean MacLennan
2008-06-06 4:20 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2008-06-25 21:46 ` Timur Tabi
2008-06-27 16:48 ` Jochen Friedrich
2008-06-05 15:46 ` Segher Boessenkool [this message]
2008-06-05 15:52 ` Jochen Friedrich
2008-06-05 15:53 ` Grant Likely
2008-06-06 4:19 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2008-06-06 4:14 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2008-06-06 4:13 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=459415320e72f1bd92d036b29c80baae@kernel.crashing.org \
--to=segher@kernel.crashing.org \
--cc=grant.likely@secretlab.ca \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org \
--cc=scottwood@freescale.com \
--cc=sr@denx.de \
--cc=timur@freescale.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.