* [PATCH 1/3] h8300: Use packed struct rather than memmove for unaligned access
@ 2008-06-24 0:28 Harvey Harrison
0 siblings, 0 replies; only message in thread
From: Harvey Harrison @ 2008-06-24 0:28 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Yoshinori Sato; +Cc: Andrew Morton, LKML
Signed-off-by: Harvey Harrison <harvey.harrison@gmail.com>
---
There are only 3 arches that use the memmove implementation, do you see
any problems with using the packed struct implementation so the memmove
version could be removed?
include/asm-h8300/unaligned.h | 2 +-
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/asm-h8300/unaligned.h b/include/asm-h8300/unaligned.h
index b8d06c7..ab851e7 100644
--- a/include/asm-h8300/unaligned.h
+++ b/include/asm-h8300/unaligned.h
@@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
#ifndef _ASM_H8300_UNALIGNED_H
#define _ASM_H8300_UNALIGNED_H
-#include <linux/unaligned/be_memmove.h>
+#include <linux/unaligned/be_struct.h>
#include <linux/unaligned/le_byteshift.h>
#include <linux/unaligned/generic.h>
--
1.5.6.290.gc4e15
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] only message in thread
only message in thread, other threads:[~2008-06-24 0:29 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: (only message) (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2008-06-24 0:28 [PATCH 1/3] h8300: Use packed struct rather than memmove for unaligned access Harvey Harrison
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.