All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Eli Cohen <eli@dev.mellanox.co.il>
To: Or Gerlitz <ogerlitz@voltaire.com>
Cc: Jan-Bernd Themann <THEMANN@de.ibm.com>,
	OpenFabrics General <general@lists.openfabrics.org>,
	netdev@vger.kernel.org, Roland Dreier <rdreier@cisco.com>,
	Vladimir Sokolovsky <vlad@mellanox.co.il>
Subject: Re: [ofa-general] [PATCH] net/inet_lro: remove setting skb->ip_summed when not LRO-able
Date: Wed, 25 Jun 2008 15:30:05 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1214397005.23583.60.camel@mtls03> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4862304D.2050306@voltaire.com>


On Wed, 2008-06-25 at 14:47 +0300, Or Gerlitz wrote:
> Jan-Bernd Themann wrote:
> > no, what I meant is that it is only not needed at that particular 
> > place as  the packet is not handled by LRO. Without this line the 
> > driver can set an individual  value for each SKB that is not 
> > aggregated if wished. For example when the packet is not a valid IP 
> > packet.  However, removing all ip_summed fields impacts the fragment 
> > lro mode. There we have to set some value for not aggregated packets. 
> > The SKBs are generated within the LRO engine. If desired (and if there 
> > is HW that wants to use that) we can pass that value for each provided 
> > fragment. This would add one additional paramter to the already 8 
> > parameters of __lro_proc_segment. That is of course possible.
> OK, understood, both points. 
> 
> Eli, lets add to this patch a comment in inet_lro.h saying that the 
> value of lro_mgr->ip_summed is ignored by the core lro code for drivers 
> that use the non fragmented mode.
We already have this comment:

struct net_lro_mgr {
	...
	u32 ip_summed;      /* Set in non generated SKBs in page mode */

I think we should use have it something like that:
	...
	/*
	 * Set for generated SKBs in that are not added to
	 * the frag list in fragmented mode
	 */
	u32 ip_summed;

What do you think?


>  Also for the ipoib patch, lets not set 
> this value.
Agree.




  parent reply	other threads:[~2008-06-25 12:28 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-06-24 14:39 [PATCH] net/inet_lro: remove setting skb->ip_summed when not LRO-able Eli Cohen
2008-06-25  9:26 ` [ofa-general] " Or Gerlitz
2008-06-25 11:28   ` Jan-Bernd Themann
2008-06-25 11:47     ` Or Gerlitz
2008-06-25 12:10       ` Jan-Bernd Themann
2008-06-25 12:15       ` Jan-Bernd Themann
2008-06-25 12:30       ` Eli Cohen [this message]
2008-06-25 13:01         ` Or Gerlitz

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1214397005.23583.60.camel@mtls03 \
    --to=eli@dev.mellanox.co.il \
    --cc=THEMANN@de.ibm.com \
    --cc=general@lists.openfabrics.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=ogerlitz@voltaire.com \
    --cc=rdreier@cisco.com \
    --cc=vlad@mellanox.co.il \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.