* ACPI: ACPI_CUSTOM_DSDT_INITRD option
@ 2008-07-21 10:44 Joshua C.
2008-07-21 18:52 ` Ben Collins
0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Joshua C. @ 2008-07-21 10:44 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-kernel; +Cc: joshuacov
This feature was considered problematic for the 2.6.25 kernel. And the
0.9x version was rewritten to make the patch work better with the new
kernel (here it is: http://gaugusch.at/kernel.shtml ). What about
adding it to the new 2.6.27?
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: ACPI: ACPI_CUSTOM_DSDT_INITRD option
2008-07-21 10:44 ACPI: ACPI_CUSTOM_DSDT_INITRD option Joshua C.
@ 2008-07-21 18:52 ` Ben Collins
0 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Ben Collins @ 2008-07-21 18:52 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Joshua C.; +Cc: linux-kernel
On Mon, 2008-07-21 at 12:44 +0200, Joshua C. wrote:
> This feature was considered problematic for the 2.6.25 kernel. And the
> 0.9x version was rewritten to make the patch work better with the new
> kernel (here it is: http://gaugusch.at/kernel.shtml ). What about
> adding it to the new 2.6.27?
Could you rebase it on latest git (lots of fuzz)? Other than that, it
looks good to me. We've been carrying this patch forever, so would be
nice to have it applied upstream finally.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: ACPI: ACPI_CUSTOM_DSDT_INITRD option
@ 2008-07-21 19:57 Joshua C.
2008-07-21 20:02 ` Ben Collins
0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Joshua C. @ 2008-07-21 19:57 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-kernel
2008/7/21 Ben Collins <ben.collins@canonical.com>:
>
> Could you rebase it on latest git (lots of fuzz)? Other than that, it
> looks good to me. We've been carrying this patch forever, so would be
> nice to have it applied upstream finally.
>
>
I tried the current patch (acpi-dsdt-initrd-v0.9a-2.6.25.patch) with
fedora kernel-2.6.27-0.161.rc0.git6.fc10 which is git6 and it compiled
without any problems. I didn't modify anything on the patch. so it
should be "production" ready in its current state, shouldn't it? Maybe
this time it can make its way upstream.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: ACPI: ACPI_CUSTOM_DSDT_INITRD option
2008-07-21 19:57 Joshua C.
@ 2008-07-21 20:02 ` Ben Collins
2008-07-21 20:21 ` Joshua C.
0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Ben Collins @ 2008-07-21 20:02 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Joshua C.; +Cc: linux-kernel
On Mon, 2008-07-21 at 21:57 +0200, Joshua C. wrote:
> 2008/7/21 Ben Collins <ben.collins@canonical.com>:
> >
> > Could you rebase it on latest git (lots of fuzz)? Other than that, it
> > looks good to me. We've been carrying this patch forever, so would be
> > nice to have it applied upstream finally.
> >
> >
>
> I tried the current patch (acpi-dsdt-initrd-v0.9a-2.6.25.patch) with
> fedora kernel-2.6.27-0.161.rc0.git6.fc10 which is git6 and it compiled
> without any problems. I didn't modify anything on the patch. so it
> should be "production" ready in its current state, shouldn't it? Maybe
> this time it can make its way upstream.
I didn't have any problems with it either, but I would hate for some
fuzz to keep it from getting accepted :)
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: ACPI: ACPI_CUSTOM_DSDT_INITRD option
2008-07-21 20:02 ` Ben Collins
@ 2008-07-21 20:21 ` Joshua C.
0 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Joshua C. @ 2008-07-21 20:21 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Ben Collins; +Cc: linux-kernel
2008/7/21 Ben Collins <bcollins@swissdisk.com>:
> I didn't have any problems with it either, but I would hate for some
> fuzz to keep it from getting accepted :)
>
>
I looked at it and it looks ok to me. The "fuzzy" part is stripped
down, compared to the previous version. It should be ready now.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: ACPI: ACPI_CUSTOM_DSDT_INITRD option
@ 2008-07-21 20:26 Joshua C.
0 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Joshua C. @ 2008-07-21 20:26 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-kernel
2008/7/21 Ben Collins <bcollins@swissdisk.com>:
> I didn't have any problems with it either, but I would hate for some
> fuzz to keep it from getting accepted :)
>
>
I looked at it and it looks ok to me. The "fuzzy" part is stripped
down, compared to the previous version. It should be ready now.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2008-07-21 20:36 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2008-07-21 10:44 ACPI: ACPI_CUSTOM_DSDT_INITRD option Joshua C.
2008-07-21 18:52 ` Ben Collins
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2008-07-21 19:57 Joshua C.
2008-07-21 20:02 ` Ben Collins
2008-07-21 20:21 ` Joshua C.
2008-07-21 20:26 Joshua C.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.