Re: default udev rules

[Scott James Remnant <scott@canonical.com>]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 723 bytes --]

On Sat, 2008-08-09 at 12:21 +0200, Kay Sievers wrote:

> We like to remind everybody, that all distros should work towards a
> default udev rules set, instead of maintaining their own home-grown
> version of default rules. We should all unify as far as possible.
> Red Hat, SUSE and Gentoo are already using the same rules files, with a
> minimal rules set on top, in a distro specific file. We ask the rest of
> the universe to join us, and do the same. :)

The conflation of names and permissions in the default rules is a
problem for us, and why Ubuntu has not adopted them.

I'm also entirely unconvinced about putting rules in /lib instead
of /etc

Scott
-- 
Scott James Remnant
scott@canonical.com

[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 197 bytes --]