Re: default udev rules

[md@Linux.IT (Marco d'Itri)]

On Aug 11, Kay Sievers <kay.sievers@vrfy.org> wrote:

> There is not really a need for a compromise, we asked you to send a
> patch to add that "elegance", and we will change the default rules
Tell me what's missing from my rules instead, I will fix it and then you
will be able to use them. If nothing is missing, then you can replace
the files right now.

BTW: *I* documented the semantics of the Debian rules files. From
README.Debian:

Since the order may be important, files have a specific name which
must be considered when adding custom rules. So far have been defined:

 - 50: the default names are set.

 - 60: path_id and the other *_id programs are run. persistent links
   are created.

 - 70: network interfaces are renamed and generated rules for persistent
   links are processed.

 - 75: the rules generators are run if needed.

 - 80: drivers are loaded.

 - 91: the default permissions and owners are set.

 - 95: $REMOVE_CMD is run, and then processing of tty devices
   is stopped with last_rule.

-- 
ciao,
Marco