* Re: Camellia encryption module: incompatible [not found] <20080906124449.GB28842@frittella.fluido.as> @ 2008-09-06 14:42 ` Herbert Xu 2008-09-06 20:57 ` Carlo E. Prelz 2008-09-07 19:55 ` Harvey Harrison 0 siblings, 2 replies; 4+ messages in thread From: Herbert Xu @ 2008-09-06 14:42 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Carlo E. Prelz; +Cc: Harvey Harrison, Linux Crypto Mailing List On Sat, Sep 06, 2008 at 02:44:49PM +0200, Carlo E. Prelz wrote: > Hello there. I see you are the person who pushed upwards changes > related to the Linux crypto susbsystem for 2.6.27. I wanted to let you > know that, on a Core2 laptop platform, the new code for the Camellia > module generates different encrypted content. Both implementations > work, but a file that was encrypted with pre-2.6.27 cannot be > decrypted with the current code. > > Was this intentional? I saw no indication about this on the notes that > went with the patch. No this is not intentional. Thanks for reminding me. Harvey, I think I'm going to revert the bitops change for now. Cheers, -- Visit Openswan at http://www.openswan.org/ Email: Herbert Xu ~{PmV>HI~} <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au> Home Page: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/ PGP Key: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/pubkey.txt ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: Camellia encryption module: incompatible 2008-09-06 14:42 ` Camellia encryption module: incompatible Herbert Xu @ 2008-09-06 20:57 ` Carlo E. Prelz 2008-09-07 19:55 ` Harvey Harrison 1 sibling, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread From: Carlo E. Prelz @ 2008-09-06 20:57 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Herbert Xu; +Cc: Carlo E. Prelz, Harvey Harrison, Linux Crypto Mailing List Subject: Re: Camellia encryption module: incompatible Date: dom 07 set 08 12:42:50 +1000 Quoting Herbert Xu (herbert@gondor.apana.org.au): > No this is not intentional. Thanks for reminding me. Thank you all for all the work that goes into maintaining Linux... > Harvey, I think I'm going to revert the bitops change for now. I will be glad to verify that all is OK as soon as the change percolates into a 2.6.27-rc patch. Carlo -- * Se la Strada e la sua Virtu' non fossero state messe da parte, * K * Carlo E. Prelz - fluido@fluido.as che bisogno ci sarebbe * di parlare tanto di amore e di rettitudine? (Chuang-Tzu) ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: Camellia encryption module: incompatible 2008-09-06 14:42 ` Camellia encryption module: incompatible Herbert Xu 2008-09-06 20:57 ` Carlo E. Prelz @ 2008-09-07 19:55 ` Harvey Harrison 2008-09-10 14:58 ` Carlo E. Prelz 1 sibling, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread From: Harvey Harrison @ 2008-09-07 19:55 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Herbert Xu; +Cc: Carlo E. Prelz, Linux Crypto Mailing List On Sun, 2008-09-07 at 00:42 +1000, Herbert Xu wrote: > On Sat, Sep 06, 2008 at 02:44:49PM +0200, Carlo E. Prelz wrote: > > Hello there. I see you are the person who pushed upwards changes > > related to the Linux crypto susbsystem for 2.6.27. I wanted to let you > > know that, on a Core2 laptop platform, the new code for the Camellia > > module generates different encrypted content. Both implementations > > work, but a file that was encrypted with pre-2.6.27 cannot be > > decrypted with the current code. > > > > Was this intentional? I saw no indication about this on the notes that > > went with the patch. > > No this is not intentional. Thanks for reminding me. > > Harvey, I think I'm going to revert the bitops change for now. > Please do, I still haven't managed to to track down why this changes any behavior, I'll resubmit at a later date if I ever figure it out. Harvey ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: Camellia encryption module: incompatible 2008-09-07 19:55 ` Harvey Harrison @ 2008-09-10 14:58 ` Carlo E. Prelz 0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread From: Carlo E. Prelz @ 2008-09-10 14:58 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Harvey Harrison; +Cc: Herbert Xu, Linux Crypto Mailing List Subject: Re: Camellia encryption module: incompatible Date: dom 07 set 08 12:55:42 -0700 Quoting Harvey Harrison (harvey.harrison@gmail.com): > > > Was this intentional? I saw no indication about this on the notes that > > > went with the patch. > > > > No this is not intentional. Thanks for reminding me. > > > > Harvey, I think I'm going to revert the bitops change for now. > > > > Please do, I still haven't managed to to track down why this changes > any behavior, I'll resubmit at a later date if I ever figure it out. I can confirm that, with 2.6.27-rc6, my camellia-encrypted partition mounts cleanly once more. Thanks Carlo -- * Se la Strada e la sua Virtu' non fossero state messe da parte, * K * Carlo E. Prelz - fluido@fluido.as che bisogno ci sarebbe * di parlare tanto di amore e di rettitudine? (Chuang-Tzu) ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2008-09-10 14:57 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
[not found] <20080906124449.GB28842@frittella.fluido.as>
2008-09-06 14:42 ` Camellia encryption module: incompatible Herbert Xu
2008-09-06 20:57 ` Carlo E. Prelz
2008-09-07 19:55 ` Harvey Harrison
2008-09-10 14:58 ` Carlo E. Prelz
This is an external index of several public inboxes, see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror all data and code used by this external index.