From: "Miloslav Trmač" <mitr@redhat.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-audit@redhat.com,
viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Audit: fix handling of 'strings' with NULL characters
Date: Fri, 12 Sep 2008 22:03:35 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1221249815.2702.16.camel@amilo> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20080911170920.e88e7bc5.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Andrew Morton píše v Čt 11. 09. 2008 v 17:09 -0700:
> OK, I am now officially confused about the relationship between this
> patch, Miloslav's two patches and 2.6.27/2.6.26/2.6.25.
>
> Think I'll go into hiding for a while - please wake us up when it's all
> sorted out.
Eric's patch ["Audit: fix handling of 'strings' with NULL characters"]
replaces my 1/2 ["audit: fix NUL handling in untrusted strings"], and
makes my 2/2 ["audit: Handle embedded NUL in TTY input auditing"]
technically unnecessary - but from the semantics POV 2/2 should still be
applied.
Either Eric's patch or my 2/2 should go to the stable releases. The
other patches do not have to.
Mirek
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: "Miloslav Trmač" <mitr@redhat.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Eric Paris <eparis@redhat.com>,
linux-audit@redhat.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk, jdennis@redhat.com, sgrubb@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Audit: fix handling of 'strings' with NULL characters
Date: Fri, 12 Sep 2008 22:03:35 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1221249815.2702.16.camel@amilo> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20080911170920.e88e7bc5.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Andrew Morton píše v Čt 11. 09. 2008 v 17:09 -0700:
> OK, I am now officially confused about the relationship between this
> patch, Miloslav's two patches and 2.6.27/2.6.26/2.6.25.
>
> Think I'll go into hiding for a while - please wake us up when it's all
> sorted out.
Eric's patch ["Audit: fix handling of 'strings' with NULL characters"]
replaces my 1/2 ["audit: fix NUL handling in untrusted strings"], and
makes my 2/2 ["audit: Handle embedded NUL in TTY input auditing"]
technically unnecessary - but from the semantics POV 2/2 should still be
applied.
Either Eric's patch or my 2/2 should go to the stable releases. The
other patches do not have to.
Mirek
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-09-12 20:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-09-11 21:48 [PATCH] Audit: fix handling of 'strings' with NULL characters Eric Paris
2008-09-11 21:48 ` Eric Paris
2008-09-12 0:09 ` Andrew Morton
2008-09-12 0:09 ` Andrew Morton
2008-09-12 20:03 ` Miloslav Trmač [this message]
2008-09-12 20:03 ` Miloslav Trmač
2008-09-12 19:59 ` [PATCH] Audit: Ignore terminating NUL in AUDIT_USER_TTY messages Miloslav Trmač
2008-09-12 19:59 ` Miloslav Trmač
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1221249815.2702.16.camel@amilo \
--to=mitr@redhat.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=linux-audit@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.