From: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>
To: Paul Mundt <lethal@linux-sh.org>
Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven <Geert.Uytterhoeven@sonycom.com>,
Bill Gatliff <bgat@billgatliff.com>,
Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>,
Linux/PPC Development <linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org>,
linux-embedded@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC 0/6] Proposal for a Generic PWM Device API
Date: Fri, 10 Oct 2008 10:46:43 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1223632003.12547.65.camel@macbook.infradead.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20081010093642.GA10579@linux-sh.org>
On Fri, 2008-10-10 at 18:36 +0900, Paul Mundt wrote:
> This is likely because some of those lists are subscribers only, so cross
> posting is poor form. It makes sense to keep the discussion in one place,
> and to send notification messages with a pointer to the list archives to
> the other lists so folks can jump in if they really care. Splitting it
> out doesn't help matters in the least, but unfortunately this is what
> seems to happen the most when subscribers only lists are involved.
Subscriber-only lists are broken. Just don't use them.
--
David Woodhouse Open Source Technology Centre
David.Woodhouse@intel.com Intel Corporation
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>
To: Paul Mundt <lethal@linux-sh.org>
Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven <Geert.Uytterhoeven@sonycom.com>,
Bill Gatliff <bgat@billgatliff.com>,
linux-embedded@vger.kernel.org,
Linux/PPC Development <linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC 0/6] Proposal for a Generic PWM Device API
Date: Fri, 10 Oct 2008 10:46:43 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1223632003.12547.65.camel@macbook.infradead.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20081010093642.GA10579@linux-sh.org>
On Fri, 2008-10-10 at 18:36 +0900, Paul Mundt wrote:
> This is likely because some of those lists are subscribers only, so cross
> posting is poor form. It makes sense to keep the discussion in one place,
> and to send notification messages with a pointer to the list archives to
> the other lists so folks can jump in if they really care. Splitting it
> out doesn't help matters in the least, but unfortunately this is what
> seems to happen the most when subscribers only lists are involved.
Subscriber-only lists are broken. Just don't use them.
--
David Woodhouse Open Source Technology Centre
David.Woodhouse@intel.com Intel Corporation
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-10-10 9:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 65+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-10-08 16:43 [RFC 0/6] Proposal for a Generic PWM Device API Bill Gatliff
2008-10-08 16:43 ` [RFC 1/6] [PWM] Generic PWM API implementation Bill Gatliff
2008-10-09 8:17 ` Marc Pignat
2008-10-10 3:20 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2008-10-10 4:07 ` Bill Gatliff
2008-10-10 14:07 ` Bill Gatliff
2008-10-13 16:04 ` Scott Wood
2008-10-08 16:43 ` [RFC 2/6] [PWM] Changes to existing include/linux/pwm.h to adapt to generic PWM API Bill Gatliff
2008-10-08 16:43 ` [RFC 1/6] [PWM] Generic PWM API implementation Bill Gatliff
2008-10-08 16:43 ` [RFC 3/6] [PWM] Documentation Bill Gatliff
2008-10-08 16:43 ` [RFC 2/6] [PWM] Changes to existing include/linux/pwm.h to adapt to generic PWM API Bill Gatliff
2008-10-08 16:43 ` [RFC 4/6] [PWM] Driver for Atmel PWMC peripheral Bill Gatliff
2008-10-08 16:43 ` [RFC 3/6] [PWM] Documentation Bill Gatliff
2008-10-08 16:43 ` [RFC 4/6] [PWM] Driver for Atmel PWMC peripheral Bill Gatliff
2008-10-08 16:43 ` [RFC 5/6] [PWM] Install new Atmel PWMC driver in Kconfig, expunge old one Bill Gatliff
2008-10-09 5:21 ` Hans-Christian Egtvedt
2008-10-09 12:16 ` Haavard Skinnemoen
2008-10-09 12:17 ` Hans-Christian Egtvedt
2008-10-09 14:04 ` Bill Gatliff
2008-10-09 13:40 ` Bill Gatliff
2008-10-09 13:44 ` Hans-Christian Egtvedt
2008-10-08 16:43 ` Bill Gatliff
2008-10-08 16:43 ` [RFC 6/6] [PWM] New LED driver and trigger that use PWM API Bill Gatliff
2008-10-08 16:43 ` Bill Gatliff
2008-10-08 19:27 ` [RFC 0/6] Proposal for a Generic PWM Device API Mike Frysinger
2008-10-09 2:23 ` Bill Gatliff
2008-10-09 2:29 ` Bill Gatliff
2008-10-09 2:32 ` Mike Frysinger
2008-10-09 3:46 ` Bill Gatliff
2008-10-09 4:05 ` Mike Frysinger
2008-10-09 4:18 ` Bill Gatliff
2008-10-09 4:33 ` Mike Frysinger
2008-10-09 21:08 ` Matt Sealey
2008-10-09 21:29 ` Bill Gatliff
2008-10-10 3:20 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2008-10-10 4:06 ` Bill Gatliff
2008-10-10 5:02 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2008-10-10 5:06 ` Jon Smirl
2008-10-10 14:04 ` Bill Gatliff
2008-10-10 14:12 ` Jon Smirl
2008-10-10 20:45 ` Jon Loeliger
2008-10-12 2:32 ` Matt Sealey
2008-10-10 9:00 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2008-10-10 9:00 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2008-10-10 9:36 ` Paul Mundt
2008-10-10 9:36 ` Paul Mundt
2008-10-10 9:46 ` David Woodhouse [this message]
2008-10-10 9:46 ` David Woodhouse
2008-10-10 13:59 ` Bill Gatliff
2008-10-10 13:59 ` Bill Gatliff
2008-10-10 14:03 ` Bill Gatliff
2008-10-10 14:03 ` Bill Gatliff
2008-10-10 14:32 ` Haavard Skinnemoen
2008-10-10 14:32 ` Haavard Skinnemoen
2008-10-10 17:28 ` Paul Mundt
2008-10-10 19:15 ` Bill Gatliff
2008-10-10 19:15 ` Bill Gatliff
2008-10-10 13:59 ` Bill Gatliff
2008-10-10 13:59 ` Bill Gatliff
2008-10-10 17:40 ` Paul Mundt
2008-10-10 17:40 ` Paul Mundt
2008-10-10 19:42 ` Bill Gatliff
2008-10-13 7:40 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2008-10-13 7:40 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2008-10-08 16:43 Bill Gatliff
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1223632003.12547.65.camel@macbook.infradead.org \
--to=dwmw2@infradead.org \
--cc=Geert.Uytterhoeven@sonycom.com \
--cc=benh@kernel.crashing.org \
--cc=bgat@billgatliff.com \
--cc=lethal@linux-sh.org \
--cc=linux-embedded@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.