From: Harvey Harrison <harvey.harrison@gmail.com>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Cc: Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@gmail.com>,
torvalds@osdl.org, viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk,
acme@ghostprotocols.net, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] headers: move release_kernel_lock(), reacquire_kernel_lock() to sched.c
Date: Tue, 28 Oct 2008 23:29:24 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1225261764.20276.7.camel@brick> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20081029061827.GA7936@elte.hu>
On Wed, 2008-10-29 at 07:18 +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> * Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@gmail.com> wrote:
> > +#ifdef CONFIG_LOCK_KERNEL
> > +/*
> > + * Release/re-acquire global kernel lock for the scheduler
> > + */
> > +#define release_kernel_lock(tsk) do { \
> > + if (unlikely((tsk)->lock_depth >= 0)) \
> > + __release_kernel_lock(); \
> > +} while (0)
> > +
> > +static inline int reacquire_kernel_lock(struct task_struct *task)
> > +{
> > + if (unlikely(task->lock_depth >= 0))
> > + return __reacquire_kernel_lock();
> > + return 0;
> > +}
> > +#else
> > +#define release_kernel_lock(task) do { } while(0)
> > +#define reacquire_kernel_lock(task) 0
> > +#endif
>
Also is it possible to keep them as inlines in both the CONFIG_LOCK_KERNEL
and !CONFIG_LOCK_KERNEL
Something like (without checking if release_kernel_lock _can_ be an inline:
static inline void release_kernel_lock(struct task_struct *task)
{
#ifdef CONFIG_LOCK_KERNEL
if (unlikely(task->lock_depth >= 0))
__release_kernel_lock();
#endif
return;
}
static inline int reacquire_kernel_lock(struct task_struct *task)
{
#ifdef CONFIG_LOCK_KERNEL
if (unlikely(task->lock_depth >= 0))
return __reacquire_kernel_lock();
#endif
return 0;
}
Then the typechecking is kept in both CONFIG_LOCK_KERNEL/!CONFIG_LOCK_KERNEL
Cheers,
Harvey
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-10-29 6:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-10-29 4:43 [GIT] headers redux Alexey Dobriyan
2008-10-29 4:44 ` [PATCH 1/2] headers: move release_kernel_lock(), reacquire_kernel_lock() to sched.c Alexey Dobriyan
2008-10-29 4:45 ` [PATCH 2/2] headers: reduction in interrupt.h Alexey Dobriyan
2008-10-29 6:21 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-10-29 6:18 ` [PATCH 1/2] headers: move release_kernel_lock(), reacquire_kernel_lock() to sched.c Ingo Molnar
2008-10-29 6:29 ` Harvey Harrison [this message]
2008-10-29 10:04 ` Christoph Hellwig
2008-10-29 13:14 ` Alexey Dobriyan
2008-10-29 16:42 ` Ingo Molnar
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1225261764.20276.7.camel@brick \
--to=harvey.harrison@gmail.com \
--cc=acme@ghostprotocols.net \
--cc=adobriyan@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=torvalds@osdl.org \
--cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.