From: Viktor Rosendahl <Viktor.Rosendahl@nokia.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] Make sure that any oops is flushed to the mtdoops console
Date: Fri, 31 Oct 2008 15:05:28 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1225458328.16867.23.camel@viktor.research.nokia.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20081030131734.c74e614d.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
On Thu, 2008-10-30 at 13:17 -0700, ext Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Wed, 22 Oct 2008 18:16:28 +0300
> Viktor Rosendahl <viktor.rosendahl@nokia.com> wrote:
<clip>
> > void __attribute__((weak)) bust_spinlocks(int yes)
> > @@ -22,6 +23,7 @@ void __attribute__((weak)) bust_spinlocks(int yes)
> > #ifdef CONFIG_VT
> > unblank_screen();
> > #endif
> > + console_unblank();
> > if (--oops_in_progress == 0)
> > wake_up_klogd();
> > }
>
> That looks logical. From my reading we can now remove that
> unblank_screen(), because the console_unblank() will call
> vt_console_driver.unblank() for us?
For some reason, we did not think about it here when the N810 kernel was
fixed. It looks good to me but if you do it, then there will be a slight
difference in behavior, since console_unblank() will call
vt_console_driver.unblank() only if the console_sem can be acquired,
otherwise it just returns without doing anything.
Maybe console_unblank() should be changed to not care too much about the
console_sem if an oops is in progress?
best regards,
Viktor
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Viktor Rosendahl <Viktor.Rosendahl@nokia.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] Make sure that any oops is flushed to the mtdoops console
Date: Fri, 31 Oct 2008 15:05:28 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1225458328.16867.23.camel@viktor.research.nokia.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20081030131734.c74e614d.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
On Thu, 2008-10-30 at 13:17 -0700, ext Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Wed, 22 Oct 2008 18:16:28 +0300
> Viktor Rosendahl <viktor.rosendahl@nokia.com> wrote:
<clip>
> > void __attribute__((weak)) bust_spinlocks(int yes)
> > @@ -22,6 +23,7 @@ void __attribute__((weak)) bust_spinlocks(int yes)
> > #ifdef CONFIG_VT
> > unblank_screen();
> > #endif
> > + console_unblank();
> > if (--oops_in_progress == 0)
> > wake_up_klogd();
> > }
>
> That looks logical. From my reading we can now remove that
> unblank_screen(), because the console_unblank() will call
> vt_console_driver.unblank() for us?
For some reason, we did not think about it here when the N810 kernel was
fixed. It looks good to me but if you do it, then there will be a slight
difference in behavior, since console_unblank() will call
vt_console_driver.unblank() only if the console_sem can be acquired,
otherwise it just returns without doing anything.
Maybe console_unblank() should be changed to not care too much about the
console_sem if an oops is in progress?
best regards,
Viktor
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-10-31 13:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-10-22 15:16 [PATCH 0/1] Make sure that any oops is flushed to the mtdoops console Viktor Rosendahl
2008-10-22 15:16 ` [PATCH 1/1] " Viktor Rosendahl
2008-10-30 20:17 ` Andrew Morton
2008-10-30 20:17 ` Andrew Morton
2008-10-31 13:05 ` Viktor Rosendahl [this message]
2008-10-31 13:05 ` Viktor Rosendahl
2008-11-05 0:00 ` Andrew Morton
2008-11-05 0:00 ` Andrew Morton
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1225458328.16867.23.camel@viktor.research.nokia.com \
--to=viktor.rosendahl@nokia.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.