* [PATCH] fc_transport: fix old bug on bitflag definitions
@ 2008-11-20 15:58 James Smart
0 siblings, 0 replies; only message in thread
From: James Smart @ 2008-11-20 15:58 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-scsi
I thought we had corrected this a while ago - however, it's still
in 2.6.28-rc?.
When the fastfail flag was added, it did not account for the flags
being bit fields. Correct the definition so there is no longer a
conflict.
James - we need to get this into 2.6.28
-- james s
Signed-off-by: James Smart <james.smart@emulex.com>
---
scsi_transport_fc.h | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff -upNr a/include/scsi/scsi_transport_fc.h b/include/scsi/scsi_transport_fc.h
--- a/include/scsi/scsi_transport_fc.h 2008-10-18 10:32:54.000000000 -0400
+++ b/include/scsi/scsi_transport_fc.h 2008-11-20 10:54:02.000000000 -0500
@@ -357,7 +357,7 @@ struct fc_rport { /* aka fc_starget_attr
/* bit field values for struct fc_rport "flags" field: */
#define FC_RPORT_DEVLOSS_PENDING 0x01
#define FC_RPORT_SCAN_PENDING 0x02
-#define FC_RPORT_FAST_FAIL_TIMEDOUT 0x03
+#define FC_RPORT_FAST_FAIL_TIMEDOUT 0x04
#define dev_to_rport(d) \
container_of(d, struct fc_rport, dev)
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] only message in thread
only message in thread, other threads:[~2008-11-20 15:57 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: (only message) (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2008-11-20 15:58 [PATCH] fc_transport: fix old bug on bitflag definitions James Smart
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.